| Literature DB >> 31388519 |
Hajime Matsumine1, Giorgio Giatsidis2, Atsuyoshi Osada1, Wataru Kamei1, Hiroshi Fujimaki1, Yasuhiro Tsukamoto1, Kazuki Hashimoto1, Kaori Fujii1, Hiroyuki Sakurai1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Bi-layered skin reconstruction can be achieved by staged grafting of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and cultured epithelial keratinocyte sheets (KSs). Both KSs and ADMs have been used for long; yet, their combined use has shown poor effectiveness. This outcome has been related to the enzymatic treatment used in the preparation of KSs, which impairs their adhesion potential to ADMs and the formation of a basement membrane (BM). Temperature-responsive (TR) culture dishes allow for enzyme-free preparation of KSs with preservation of BMs and intercellular adhesion proteins; yet, their use has not been previously applied to staged bi-layered skin reconstruction. Using an in vivo rat model, we tested the hypothesis that TR cultures enhance KSs survival and BM preservation after sequential grafting on ADMs.Entities:
Keywords: ADMs, acellular dermal matrices; Acellular dermal matrices; Artificial dermis; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; Epithelial keratinocyte sheet; HE, hematoxylin and eosin; IHC, immunohistochemistry; KCM, keratinocyte culture medium; KSs, keratinocyte sheet; Keratinocyte; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; Temperature-responsive dish
Year: 2019 PMID: 31388519 PMCID: PMC6669809 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2019.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Ther ISSN: 2352-3204 Impact factor: 3.419
Fig. 1Schematic overview of experimental procedures. DT, Dispase treatment; TR, temperature-responsive.
Fig. 2Human KSs-grafted rat model. (A) Full-thickness square skin defect (30 × 30 mm2) created in the dorsum of experimental rats using surgical scissors. (B) Defect covered by an ADM grafted, placed on the wound. (C) Cultured KSs, collected from temperature-responsive (TR) and normal dishes (DT) transferred with a CellShifter™ cell sheet recovery system (circle, 25 mm diameter) are grafted onto the median of the neodermis. (D) Grafted KSs covered with ointment-impregnated gauze cut to a 35-mm diameter circle in a 35-mm diameter Petri dish. Scale bars represent 10 mm.
Fig. 3Human KSs: Comparison of external appearance, tissue structure, and sheet thickness between the groups. External appearance of (A) DT-cultured KSs and (B) TR-cultured KSs does not differ greatly after cell sheet harvesting. Scale bars represent 1 mm. HE staining shows a more orderly and dense basal side cell structure for (D) TR-cultured KSs compared to (C) DT-cultured KSs. Scale bars represent 50 μm. Immunostaining for Collagen IV and laminin showing widespread expression of Collagen IV and laminin in TR-cultured KSs on the basal side (F and H); in contrast, DT-cultured KSs show only sparse expression of Collagen IV and laminin (E and G). Scale bars indicate 50 μm. (I) Average thickness of DT-cultured KSs was 15.2 ± 5.7 μm and that of TR-cultured KSs was 17.7 ± 3.5 μm; there was no significant difference in the in vitro thickness of the KSs between groups.
Fig. 4External appearance, pathological features, graft survival area, and epidermal thickness of KSs grafts one week after grafting onto an ADM. (A) DT-cultured KSs grafts and (B) TR-cultured KSs grafts, one week after grafting onto ADMs. Scale bars represent 1 mm. At ×50 magnification, HE staining shows thicker stratification of the epidermis for (D) TR-cultured KSs grafts, compared to (C) DT-cultured KSs grafts; Scale bars represent 500 μm. At ×200 magnification, HE staining shows sparse unaligned basal cells for (E) DT-cultured KSs grafts; in contrast, (F) TR-cultured KSs grafts show a palisade of basal cells seen between the dermal granulation tissue and the KSs. (G) KSs graft survival area one week after transplant onto ADMs was 120 ± 49 mm2 for TR-cultured KSs grafts, 2-fold higher than that of the DT-cultured KSs grafts (63 ± 42 mm2) (p < 0.05). (H) On HE staining, epidermal thickness was 165 ± 78 μm for TR-cultured KSs grafts, 2.5-fold higher than that of DT-cultured KSs grafts (65 ± 54 μm) (p < 0.01).
Fig. 5KSs prepared with a dispase treatment (DT) or TR culture dish and grafted onto an ADM at one week after grafting. Double immunostaining with anti-pan-Cytokeratin (red) and anti-Collagen IV (green) antibodies. Scale bars represent 100 μm.
Fig. 6Immunohistochemistry of keratinocytes. In both DT-cultured KSs grafts and TR-cultured KSs grafts, stacked cells showed positive staining for Cytokeratin 5(pan-epidermal cell marker), despite differences in their thicknesses. Cytokeratin 1(epidermal marker expressed above the basal cell layer) was positive only in an extremely thin layer in DT-cultured KSs grafts, but was positive in a thicker and densely stacked spur cell layer and granular cell layer in TR-cultured KSs. Cytokeratin 6 (hyperproliferative squamous cells marker) was sparsely positive among the cells in DT-cultured KSs grafts, but was positive in all epidermal layers in TR-cultured KSs grafts. Scale bars represent 100 μm.