Literature DB >> 31387467

Safety, effectiveness, and health care cost comparisons among elderly patients with venous thromboembolism prescribed warfarin or apixaban in the United States Medicare population.

Patrick Hlavacek1, Jennifer D Guo2, Lisa Rosenblatt2, Allison Keshishian3,4, Cristina Russ1, Jack Mardekian1, Mauricio Ferri2, Tayla Poretta2, Huseyin Yuce4, Robert McBane5.   

Abstract

Objective: To compare safety, effectiveness, and healthcare costs of major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and all-cause hospitalization among elderly Medicare VTE patients prescribed warfarin vs apixaban.
Methods: Using 100% Medicare data, elderly patients prescribed apixaban or warfarin within 30 days after a VTE encounter were identified. Patients had continuous health plan enrollment and no parenteral or oral anticoagulant use ≤6 months preceding the VTE encounter. Cohorts were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, recurrent VTE, and all-cause hospitalization. Generalized linear and two-part models were used to estimate MB-, recurrent VTE-, and all-cause related costs (per patient per month [PPPM]).
Results: In the pre-matched cohort, 25,284 (66.9%) patients were prescribed warfarin and 12,515 (33.1%) apixaban. After 1:1 PSM, 11,363 matched pairs of apixaban-warfarin patients were included for a mean follow-up of 4.0 and 4.4 months, respectively. Matched cohorts had a mean age of 78 years and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 2.9. Warfarin was associated with a higher risk of MB (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-1.57) and CRNM bleeding (HR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.19-1.43) vs apixaban. The risks of recurrent VTE (HR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.70-1.33) and all-cause hospitalization (HR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.99-1.12) were similar among warfarin and apixaban patients. Warfarin patients had higher MB-related ($147 vs $75; p = .003) and all-cause costs PPPM ($3,267 vs $3,033; p < .001), but similar recurrent VTE-related medical costs PPPM ($30 vs $36; p = .516) vs apixaban patients.Conclusions: Warfarin was associated with significantly higher risk of MB and CRNM bleeding as well as higher MB-related and all-cause costs vs apixaban patients. Recurrent VTE risk and costs were similar among warfarin and apixaban patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VTE; Warfarin; apixaban; major bleeding; recurrent VTE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31387467     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1653067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Venous Thromboembolism Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Alexander T Cohen; Janvi Sah; Amol D Dhamane; Theodore Lee; Lisa Rosenblatt; Patrick Hlavacek; Birol Emir; Rachel Delinger; Huseyin Yuce; Xuemei Luo
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 6.681

2.  Effectiveness and safety of apixaban vs warfarin among venous thromboembolism patients at high-risk of bleeding.

Authors:  Alexander T Cohen; Janvi Sah; Amol D Dhamane; Theodore Lee; Lisa Rosenblatt; Patrick Hlavacek; Birol Emir; Allison Keshishian; Huseyin Yuce; Xuemei Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Platelet Count and Bleeding in Patients Receiving Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: Lesson from the RIETE Registry.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Di Micco; Manuel Monreal
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2019-12-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.