Literature DB >> 31386911

Atrophy of individual thigh muscles measured by MRI in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study.

Koun Yamauchi1, Shigetoshi Suzuki2, Chisato Kato3, Takayuki Kato3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The characteristics of thigh-muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) remain controversial.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate atrophy of individual thigh muscles in older adults with KOA and to determine which muscle CSA should be measured to detect KOA-related muscle atrophy of the thigh.
METHODS: In older adults, individual thigh-muscle CSA measured by 1.5 Tesla MRI was analyzed at 5% intervals of the femoral length (FL) around the mid-thigh between the proximal 25% of the FL and the distal 25%. Participants with KOA grade≤1 and grade≥2 were compared for ratios of quadriceps muscle (QM) CSA to total thigh, individual QM CSA to QM, and individual hamstring (HAM) CSA to HAM at 5% intervals.
RESULTS: We included 40 older adults [20 males; mean (SD) age 73.3 (4.7) years; 20 with KOA grade≤1 and 20 with KOA grade≥2]. The ratio of vastus medialis (VM) CSA to QM from the proximal 25% to distal 15% and the ratio of semi-membranosus (SM) CSA to HAM at the distal 10% to 25% were significantly lower with KOA grade≥2 than grade≤1; the effect sizes were 0.34 to 0.67 for VM and 0.40 to 0.60 for SM. The effect sizes were greatest for the ratios of VM CSA to QM at the mid-thigh with 5% intervals and the ratio of SM CSA to HAM at the distal 25%.
CONCLUSIONS: The ratio of VM CSA to QM and/or that of SM CSA to HAM were low and were the best indicators to detect KOA-related muscle atrophy of the thigh. However, to detect KOA-related muscle atrophy, the VM CSA ratio should be analyzed in the thigh region around the mid-thigh, whereas the SM CSA ratio should be analyzed in the thigh region at the muscle belly.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hamstring; Knee osteoarthritis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Muscle cross-sectional area; Quadriceps muscle

Year:  2019        PMID: 31386911     DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1877-0657


  4 in total

1.  [Measurement and evaluation of the quadriceps muscle mass in young men based on magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  Y F Wu; X Y Zhang; S Ren; Y X Yu; C Q Chang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-10-18

2.  The Effects of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Individual Quadriceps Muscle Thickness and Circulating Biomarkers.

Authors:  Jae-Ho Yang; Seung-Pyo Eun; Dong-Ho Park; Hyo-Bum Kwak; Eunwook Chang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Associations of muscle size and fatty infiltration with bone mineral density of the proximal femur bone.

Authors:  Junfei Li; Yijing Wang; Xuesong Zhang; Ping Zhang; Yunshan Su; Lin Bai; Yali Wang; Ming Wang; Jian Zhao
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 4.  Sarcopenia in rheumatic disorders: what the radiologist and rheumatologist should know.

Authors:  Wilfred Manzano; Leon Lenchik; Akshay S Chaudhari; Lawrence Yao; Sarthak Gupta; Robert D Boutin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.