Literature DB >> 31386793

Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and description of technique.

Jihad Kaouk1, Rair Valero1, Guilherme Sawczyn1, Juan Garisto1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe our technique of extraperitoneal single-port (SP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and present our clinical experience with the first 10 cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 10 consecutive patients diagnosed with localised prostate cancer underwent extraperitoneal SP-RARP using the da Vinci SP® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Exclusion criteria included previous surgery through an infra-umbilical midline incision, prostate size >100 g, or preoperative evidence of extraprostatic disease. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon with previous experience of >3000 cases in robotic surgery. Demographics and perioperative information were collected including: operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, length of stay, and days with Foley catheter. The extraperitoneal SP-RARP is performed as follows. Firstly, a 3-cm incision ~2 cm below the umbilicus is made. Dissection of the extraperitoneal space is achieved using a kidney shaped Spacemaker™ balloon (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland), placed through the infra-umbilical incision caudally reaching the retropubic space. Thereafter, the balloon is deployed; the space is created and verified under direct vision with a laparoscopic endoscope. A GelPOINT® mini advanced access platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) is inserted and a dedicated 25-mm multichannel port is placed with a 12-mm accessory laparoscopic port through the gel-seal cap into the same incision. The da Vinci SP surgical platform robot is docked with the patient in a supine position. RARP is performed replicating the technique previously described for multi-arm platforms or transperitoneal SP-RARP. No drain and no additional assistant ports were utilised.
RESULTS: The patient's ages ranged between 48 and 70 years, and the mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 9 ng/mL. No conversions or intraoperative complications were recorded. The median (interquartile range) operative time was 197.5 (185.5-229.7) min. EBL ranged between 50 and 400 mL, six patients were discharged on the same day as the surgery and the median time with a Foley catheter after surgery was 8 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal SP-RARP is a feasible and safe surgical option to treat localised prostate cancer. In our early experience, promising results and possible advantages were found such as: a small single incision, no additional ports, no Trendelenburg positioning, minimal postoperative pain and use of opioids, and same day discharge. Further investigations need to be done to validate these advantages.
© 2019 The Authors BJU International © 2019 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SP robot; extaperitoneal; minimally invasive surgery; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; single-port

Year:  2019        PMID: 31386793     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

1.  Single-port robotic surgery: the next generation of minimally invasive urology.

Authors:  Ryan W Dobbs; Whitney R Halgrimson; Susan Talamini; Hari T Vigneswaran; Jessica O Wilson; Simone Crivellaro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era.

Authors:  Juan Garisto; Riccardo Bertolo; Clark A Wilson; Jihad Kaouk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Single-port robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy is associated with decreased post-operative narcotic use in a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Vishnu Ganesan; Ryan L Steinberg; Alaina Garbens; Hersh Trivedi; Igor Sorokin; Claus A Roehrborn; Brett A Johnson; Jeffrey C Gahan
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-04-10

Review 4.  Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: History, Efficacy, Cost, And Future Trends.

Authors:  Marissa D'Souza; Julian Gendreau; Austin Feng; Lily H Kim; Allen L Ho; Anand Veeravagu
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2019-11-07

5.  Chopstick technique used in laparoendoscopic single site radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yanzhou Wang; Yuanyang Yao; Yuya Dou; Shuai Tang; Cheng Chen; Yudi Li; Yong Chen; Li Deng; Zhiqing Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Efficacy and safety of single port robotic radical prostatectomy and multiport robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Wei; Qianying Ji; Wenren Zuo; Shiyan Wang; Xinyi Wang; Qingyi Zhu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-12

7.  Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci SP system: A single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Wan Song; Hana Yoon; Dong Hyeon Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-01-30

8.  A novel "three-port" trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ben Xu; Yi-Ji Peng; Guo-Zhong Ma; Qian Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Transperineal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with Si da Vinci surgical system: initial experience and description of technique.

Authors:  Kangxin Ni; Dingwei Xue; Gonghui Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.241

10.  A comparison of perioperative outcomes between extraperitoneal robotic single-port and multiport radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si Surgical System.

Authors:  Guan-Qun Ju; Zhi-Jun Wang; Jia-Zi Shi; Zong-Qin Zhang; Zhen-Jie Wu; Lei Yin; Bing Liu; Lin-Hui Wang; Dong-Liang Xu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.