Alex C N Holmes1, Sophia J Adams1, Scott Hall1, Mark A Rosenthal1, Katharine J Drummond1. 1. Consultation-liaison Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (A.C.N.H., S.J.A., S.H.); Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (A.C.N.H.); Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (M.A.R.); Department of Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville,Australia (M.A.R.); Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (K.J.D.); Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (K.J.D.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) have physical and psychological effects that commonly interact and change over time. Although well suited to addressing problems at the interface between physical and psychological medicine, the role of the consultation-liaison psychiatrist has not been previously described in the management of these patients. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the experience of psychiatry liaison attachment within a CNS tumor service and to reflect on its utility within a complex multidisciplinary environment. METHODS: A retrospective file review was performed on all cases seen by a psychiatrist in a CNS tumor service over the previous 5 years. A simple thematic inductive analysis was conducted of the common problems experienced by patients and their management by the psychiatrist and within the team. RESULTS: Five common themes were identified: (i) facilitating adaptation to diagnosis; (ii) supporting living with lower-grade tumors; (iii) managing mental disorders; (iv) neuropsychiatric symptoms of tumor progression; and (v) grief and uncertainty in the advanced stages of illness. The capacity of the psychiatrist to understand and integrate the clinical, pathological, radiological, and treatment information, in communication with colleagues, helped address these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological challenges in CNS tumor patients have both psychological and neurological underpinnings. In our experience, the addition of a liaison psychiatrist to a CNS tumor service was efficient and effective in improving patient management and led to enhanced communication and decision-making within the team.
BACKGROUND: Tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) have physical and psychological effects that commonly interact and change over time. Although well suited to addressing problems at the interface between physical and psychological medicine, the role of the consultation-liaison psychiatrist has not been previously described in the management of these patients. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the experience of psychiatry liaison attachment within a CNS tumor service and to reflect on its utility within a complex multidisciplinary environment. METHODS: A retrospective file review was performed on all cases seen by a psychiatrist in a CNS tumor service over the previous 5 years. A simple thematic inductive analysis was conducted of the common problems experienced by patients and their management by the psychiatrist and within the team. RESULTS: Five common themes were identified: (i) facilitating adaptation to diagnosis; (ii) supporting living with lower-grade tumors; (iii) managing mental disorders; (iv) neuropsychiatric symptoms of tumor progression; and (v) grief and uncertainty in the advanced stages of illness. The capacity of the psychiatrist to understand and integrate the clinical, pathological, radiological, and treatment information, in communication with colleagues, helped address these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological challenges in CNS tumor patients have both psychological and neurological underpinnings. In our experience, the addition of a liaison psychiatrist to a CNS tumor service was efficient and effective in improving patient management and led to enhanced communication and decision-making within the team.
Authors: M Klein; M J Taphoorn; J J Heimans; H M van der Ploeg; W P Vandertop; E F Smit; S Leenstra; C A Tulleken; W Boogerd; J S Belderbos; W Cleijne; N K Aaronson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-10-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark A Rosenthal; Katharine J Drummond; Michael Dally; Michael Murphy; Lawrence Cher; David Ashley; Vicky Thursfield; Graham G Giles Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 7.738