Nebojša Skorupan1,2, Surabhi Ranjan1,2, Seema Mehta3, Olga Yankulina1,2, Nathan Nenortas1,2, Stuart Grossman1,2, Xiaobu Ye1,4, Matthias Holdhoff1,2. 1. The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a known complication in patients with high-grade gliomas (HGGs) who are treated with radiation and chemotherapy. PJP prophylaxis is commonly recommended, but there are currently no clear guidelines regarding duration of treatment and choice of drugs. This study aimed to assess current practice patterns of PJP prophylaxis among neuro-oncologists. METHODS: An online survey of 14 multiple choice questions was sent to 207 neuro-oncologists and medical oncologists treating brain cancers at all National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in the United States. Recipients were identified via a search of the cancer centers' websites. RESULTS: Sixty-one invited experts completed the survey (response rate 29%; of these, 72% were neuro-oncologists, 18% were medical oncologists, and 10% were pediatric neuro- or medical oncologists). Seventy percent of respondents stated that they routinely prescribe PJP prophylaxis, while 7% do not provide prophylaxis. Eighty-one percent of respondents use absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) to assess lymphopenia and 13% also monitor CD4 lymphocyte counts during prophylaxis. The most commonly used first-line agent is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (88% of respondents), followed by pentamidine (6%). Discontinuation of PJP prophylaxis is determined by the following: count recovery (33% by ALC; 18% by CD4 lymphocyte counts), radiation completion (23%), and chemotherapy completion (7%). Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase levels were routinely checked by only 13% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: PJP prophylaxis is commonly used in HGG patients, but there are large variations in practice patterns, including the duration of prophylaxis. As consideration for PJP prophylaxis affects all patients with HGG, standardization of prophylaxis should be formally addressed.
BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a known complication in patients with high-grade gliomas (HGGs) who are treated with radiation and chemotherapy. PJP prophylaxis is commonly recommended, but there are currently no clear guidelines regarding duration of treatment and choice of drugs. This study aimed to assess current practice patterns of PJP prophylaxis among neuro-oncologists. METHODS: An online survey of 14 multiple choice questions was sent to 207 neuro-oncologists and medical oncologists treating brain cancers at all National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in the United States. Recipients were identified via a search of the cancer centers' websites. RESULTS: Sixty-one invited experts completed the survey (response rate 29%; of these, 72% were neuro-oncologists, 18% were medical oncologists, and 10% were pediatric neuro- or medical oncologists). Seventy percent of respondents stated that they routinely prescribe PJP prophylaxis, while 7% do not provide prophylaxis. Eighty-one percent of respondents use absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) to assess lymphopenia and 13% also monitor CD4 lymphocyte counts during prophylaxis. The most commonly used first-line agent is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (88% of respondents), followed by pentamidine (6%). Discontinuation of PJP prophylaxis is determined by the following: count recovery (33% by ALC; 18% by CD4 lymphocyte counts), radiation completion (23%), and chemotherapy completion (7%). Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase levels were routinely checked by only 13% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: PJP prophylaxis is commonly used in HGG patients, but there are large variations in practice patterns, including the duration of prophylaxis. As consideration for PJP prophylaxis affects all patients with HGG, standardization of prophylaxis should be formally addressed.
Authors: C Chan; J Montaner; E A Lefebvre; G Morey; M Dohn; R A McIvor; J Scott; R Marina; P Caldwell Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Troy D Chinevere; Clinton K Murray; Earl Grant; Gregory A Johnson; Felix Duelm; Duane R Hospenthal Journal: Mil Med Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Michael A Hughes; Michele Parisi; Stuart Grossman; Lawrence Kleinberg Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Roger Stupp; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Sandrine Ostermann Kraljevic; Alessia Pica; Ivan Maillard; Phillipe Maeder; Reto Meuli; Robert Janzer; Gianpaolo Pizzolato; Raymond Miralbell; François Porchet; Luca Regli; Nicolas de Tribolet; René O Mirimanoff; Serge Leyvraz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544