Margaretta S Page1, Susan M Chang1. 1. University of California San Francisco Neuro Oncology Gordon Murray Caregiver Program, 400 Parnassus A808, SF CA 94143.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuro-oncology caregivers face unique challenges. Caring for a patient who has a catastrophic, life-threatening diagnosis combined with progressive neurological decline can produce great distress. Experts agree that a formalized plan of care to address the needs of the neuro-oncology caregiver is needed. METHODS: In 2013, the Division of Neuro-Oncology at the University of California, San Francisco initiated a program designed to provide additional services to address the needs of the neuro-oncology caregiver. Records have been kept outlining program development, the caregivers seen, their identified needs, and services provided. RESULTS: From October 2013 through August 2015 staff met with 334 "new to clinic" caregivers, 90 of whom were caring for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. One hundred ninety-eight caregivers were deemed at high risk for distress due to transitions in patient care that were occurring. One hundred forty-nine caregivers of former patients received bereavement services for up to 6 months. The areas of highest need were emotional support and advocacy issues. The number of caregiver needs increased as patients moved along the disease trajectory. The program was able to identify resources that were lacking. Dedicated staff allowed for improvement in the kinds of caregiver-specific support services offered. CONCLUSION: Dedicated caregiver staff allows for developing relationships with caregivers across the disease trajectory and appears to be important in being able to offer individualized assessments and tailored care plans. Evaluation of caregiver and patient outcomes is the next step in understanding program effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: Neuro-oncology caregivers face unique challenges. Caring for a patient who has a catastrophic, life-threatening diagnosis combined with progressive neurological decline can produce great distress. Experts agree that a formalized plan of care to address the needs of the neuro-oncology caregiver is needed. METHODS: In 2013, the Division of Neuro-Oncology at the University of California, San Francisco initiated a program designed to provide additional services to address the needs of the neuro-oncology caregiver. Records have been kept outlining program development, the caregivers seen, their identified needs, and services provided. RESULTS: From October 2013 through August 2015 staff met with 334 "new to clinic" caregivers, 90 of whom were caring for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. One hundred ninety-eight caregivers were deemed at high risk for distress due to transitions in patient care that were occurring. One hundred forty-nine caregivers of former patients received bereavement services for up to 6 months. The areas of highest need were emotional support and advocacy issues. The number of caregiver needs increased as patients moved along the disease trajectory. The program was able to identify resources that were lacking. Dedicated staff allowed for improvement in the kinds of caregiver-specific support services offered. CONCLUSION: Dedicated caregiver staff allows for developing relationships with caregivers across the disease trajectory and appears to be important in being able to offer individualized assessments and tailored care plans. Evaluation of caregiver and patient outcomes is the next step in understanding program effectiveness.
Entities:
Keywords:
caregiver needs; caregiver program; caregiver stress; primary malignant brain tumor; quality of life.
Authors: Paula R Sherwood; Barbara A Given; Charles W Given; Rachel F Schiffman; Daniel L Murman; Mary Lovely; Alexander von Eye; Lisa R Rogers; Sandy Remer Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Allison Hricik; Heidi Donovan; Sarah E Bradley; Barbara A Given; Catherine M Bender; Alyssa Newberry; Rebekah Hamilton; Charles W Given; Paula Sherwood Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Paula Sherwood; Barbara Given; Charles Given; Rachel Schiffman; Daniel Murman; Mary Lovely Journal: Nurs Inq Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.393