BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a serious complication in immunosuppressed patients, specifically transplant recipients. Here, we describe the development and use of an assay to monitor the incidence and treatment of CMV viremia in a Cynomolgus macaque model of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for tolerance induction. We address the correlation between the course of viremia and immune reconstitution. METHODS: Twenty-one animals received a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Seven received cyclosporine A for 28 days and 14 received rapamycin. A CMV polymerase chain reaction assay was developed and run twice per week to monitor viremia. Nineteen recipients were CMV seropositive before BMT. Immune reconstitution was monitored through flow cytometry and CMV viremia was tracked via quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Recipients developed CMV viremia during the first month post-BMT. Two animals developed uncontrollable CMV disease. CMV reactivation occurred earlier in cyclosporine A-treated animals compared with those receiving rapamycin. Post-BMT, T-cell counts remained significantly lower compared with pretransplant levels until CMV reactivation, at which point they increased during the viremic phase and approached pretransplant levels 3 months post-BMT. Management of CMV required treatment before viremia reached 10 000 copies/mL; otherwise clinical symptoms were observed. High doses of ganciclovir resolved the viremia, which could subsequently be controlled with valganciclovir. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an assay to monitor CMV in Cynomolgus macaques. CMV reactivation occurred in 100% of seropositive animals in this model. Rapamycin delayed CMV reactivation and ganciclovir treatment was effective at high doses. As in humans, CD8 T cells proliferated during CMV viremia.
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a serious complication in immunosuppressed patients, specifically transplant recipients. Here, we describe the development and use of an assay to monitor the incidence and treatment of CMV viremia in a Cynomolgus macaque model of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for tolerance induction. We address the correlation between the course of viremia and immune reconstitution. METHODS: Twenty-one animals received a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Seven received cyclosporine A for 28 days and 14 received rapamycin. A CMV polymerase chain reaction assay was developed and run twice per week to monitor viremia. Nineteen recipients were CMV seropositive before BMT. Immune reconstitution was monitored through flow cytometry and CMV viremia was tracked via quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Recipients developed CMV viremia during the first month post-BMT. Two animals developed uncontrollable CMV disease. CMV reactivation occurred earlier in cyclosporine A-treated animals compared with those receiving rapamycin. Post-BMT, T-cell counts remained significantly lower compared with pretransplant levels until CMV reactivation, at which point they increased during the viremic phase and approached pretransplant levels 3 months post-BMT. Management of CMV required treatment before viremia reached 10 000 copies/mL; otherwise clinical symptoms were observed. High doses of ganciclovir resolved the viremia, which could subsequently be controlled with valganciclovir. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an assay to monitor CMV in Cynomolgus macaques. CMV reactivation occurred in 100% of seropositive animals in this model. Rapamycin delayed CMV reactivation and ganciclovir treatment was effective at high doses. As in humans, CD8 T cells proliferated during CMV viremia.
Authors: Per Ljungman; Ronald Brand; Jennifer Hoek; Rafael de la Camara; Catherine Cordonnier; Hermann Einsele; Jan Styczynski; Katherine N Ward; Simone Cesaro Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Angie K Marsh; David O Willer; Aruna P N Ambagala; Misko Dzamba; Jacqueline K Chan; Richard Pilon; Jocelyn Fournier; Paul Sandstrom; Michael Brudno; Kelly S MacDonald Journal: J Virol Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Francisco M Marty; Per Ljungman; Roy F Chemaly; Johan Maertens; Sanjeet S Dadwal; Rafael F Duarte; Shariq Haider; Andrew J Ullmann; Yuta Katayama; Janice Brown; Kathleen M Mullane; Michael Boeckh; Emily A Blumberg; Hermann Einsele; David R Snydman; Yoshinobu Kanda; Mark J DiNubile; Valerie L Teal; Hong Wan; Yoshihiko Murata; Nicholas A Kartsonis; Randi Y Leavitt; Cyrus Badshah Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H B Zheng; B Watkins; V Tkachev; S Yu; D Tran; S Furlan; K Zeleski; K Singh; K Hamby; C Hotchkiss; J Lane; S Gumber; A B Adams; L Cendales; A D Kirk; A Kaur; B R Blazar; C P Larsen; L S Kean Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Pierre Teira; Minoo Battiwalla; Muthalagu Ramanathan; A John Barrett; Kwang Woo Ahn; Min Chen; Jaime S Green; Ayman Saad; Joseph H Antin; Bipin N Savani; Hillard M Lazarus; Matthew Seftel; Wael Saber; David Marks; Mahmoud Aljurf; Maxim Norkin; John R Wingard; Caroline A Lindemans; Michael Boeckh; Marcie L Riches; Jeffery J Auletta Journal: Blood Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Nicholas L Pomplun; Logan Vosler; Kim L Weisgrau; Jessica Furlott; Andrea M Weiler; Hadia M Abdelaal; David T Evans; David I Watkins; Tetsuro Matano; Pamela J Skinner; Thomas C Friedrich; Eva G Rakasz Journal: Cytometry A Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 4.714