| Literature DB >> 31385336 |
Toby A Eyre1, Catherine Hildyard1, Angela Hamblin1, Ayesha S Ali2, Aimee Houlton2, Louise Hopkins2, Daniel Royston3, Kim M Linton4, Andrew Pettitt5, Simon Rule6, Kate Cwynarski7, Sally F Barrington8, Victoria Warbey8, David Wrench9, Sharon Barrans10, Caroline S Hirst11, Anesh Panchal2, Martine P Roudier11, Elizabeth A Harrington11, Andrew Davies12, Graham P Collins1.
Abstract
Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are unfit for or relapsed postautologous stem-cell transplantation have poor outcomes. Historically, mTORC1 inhibitors have produced responses in approximately 30% of patients in this setting. mTORC1 inhibitor efficacy may be limited by resistance mechanisms including AKT activation by mTORC2. To date, dual mTORC1/2 inhibitors targeting both the TORC1 and TORC2 complexes have not been investigated in DLBCL. This phase II trial investigated the oral dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor vistusertib in an intermittent dosing schedule of 125 mg b.d. for 2 days per week. Thirty patients received vistusertib and six received vistusertib-rituximab for up to six cycles (28-day cycles). Two partial responses were achieved on monotherapy. Durations of response were 57 and 62 days, respectively, for these patients. 19% had stable disease within six cycles. In the monotherapy arm, the median progression-free survival was1.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-2.14) months and median overall survival was 6.58 (95% CI 3.81-not reached) months, respectively. The median duration of response or stable disease across the trial duration was 153 days (95% CI 112-not reached). Tumour responses according to positron emission tomography/computed tomography versus computed tomography were concordant. There were no differences noted in tumour volume response according to cell of origin by either gene expression profiling or immunohistochemistry. Vistusertib ± rituximab was well tolerated; across 36 patients 86% of adverse events were grade (G) 1-2. Common vistusertib-related adverse events were similar to those described with mTORC1 inhibitors: nausea (47% G1-2), diarrhoea (27% G1-2, 6% G3), fatigue (30% G1-2, 3% G3), mucositis (25% G1-2, 6% G3), vomiting (17% G1-2), and dyspepsia (14% G1-2). Dual mTORC1/2 inhibitors do not clearly confer an advantage over mTORC1 inhibitors in relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Potential resistance mechanisms are discussed within.Entities:
Keywords: AZD2014; DLBCL; Vistusertib; mTORC1; mTORC2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31385336 DOI: 10.1002/hon.2662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hematol Oncol ISSN: 0278-0232 Impact factor: 5.271