Literature DB >> 31384493

Value of Dermoscopy in a Population-Based Screening Sample by Dermatologists.

Isabelle Hoorens1, Katrien Vossaert1,2, Sven Lanssens2, Laurence Dierckxsens3, Giuseppe Argenziano4, Lieve Brochez1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of dermoscopy improves the diagnosis of skin cancer significantly in trained dermatologists. However, to evaluate its cost-effectiveness in daily practice, not only sensitivity but also the excision rate is important.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the diagnostic accuracy of cases from a true population-based sample scored by general dermatologists.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-six dermatologists were randomly assigned to 145 digital cases of lesions detected at a skin cancer screening. This resulted in 4,655 case evaluations using a web application. Accuracy of diagnosis and treatment was correlated with the histological diagnosis or expert opinion.
RESULTS: The larger portion (89.7%) of the participating dermatologists reported using their dermatoscope daily. The odds of making a correct diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopy was 5.38 compared with naked-eye examination (NEE). Dermoscopy increased sensitivity for skin cancer diagnosis from 70.6% to 84.6%, but this was associated with a small but significant decrease in specificity of 3.5%. To detect 1 skin cancer, 5.23 lesions had to be biopsied/excised in this sample and this was not significantly improved by dermoscopic evaluation. Dermoscopy significantly increased the confidence about making a correct diagnosis, especially in seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, and melanoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Dermoscopy significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, the sensitivity of skin cancer detection, and the confidence in diagnosis especially for seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, and melanoma. However, this finding was not reflected in a significant reduction in the number needed to excise in this sample.

Entities:  

Keywords:  basal cell carcinoma; dermoscopy; melanoma; screening; squamous cell carcinoma

Year:  2019        PMID: 31384493      PMCID: PMC6659606          DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0903a05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept        ISSN: 2160-9381


  14 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy.

Authors:  H Kittler; H Pehamberger; K Wolff; M Binder
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  What is an intracluster correlation coefficient? Crucial concepts for primary care researchers.

Authors:  Shersten Killip; Ziyad Mahfoud; Kevin Pearce
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Dermatoscopy aids in the diagnosis of the solitary red scaly patch or plaque-features distinguishing superficial basal cell carcinoma, intraepidermal carcinoma, and psoriasis.

Authors:  Yan Pan; Alex J Chamberlain; Michael Bailey; Alvin H Chong; Martin Haskett; John W Kelly
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Accuracy in melanoma detection: a 10-year multicenter survey.

Authors:  Giuseppe Argenziano; Lorenzo Cerroni; Iris Zalaudek; Stefania Staibano; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Nicola Arpaia; Renato Marchiori Bakos; Brigitte Balme; Jadran Bandic; Roberto Bandelloni; Alexandra M G Brunasso; Horacio Cabo; David A Calcara; Blanca Carlos-Ortega; Ana Carolina Carvalho; Gabriel Casas; Huiting Dong; Gerardo Ferrara; Raffaele Filotico; Guillermo Gómez; Allan Halpern; Gennaro Ilardi; Akira Ishiko; Gulsen Kandiloglu; Hiroshi Kawasaki; Ken Kobayashi; Hiroshi Koga; Ivanka Kovalyshyn; David Langford; Xin Liu; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Massimo Mascolo; Cesare Massone; Laura Mazzoni; Scott Menzies; Akane Minagawa; Loredana Nugnes; Fezal Ozdemir; Giovanni Pellacani; Stefania Seidenari; Katherine Siamas; Ignazio Stanganelli; William V Stoecker; Masaru Tanaka; Luc Thomas; Philipp Tschandl; Harald Kittler
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  M L Bafounta; A Beauchet; P Aegerter; P Saiag
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2001-10

6.  Surface microscopy of pigmented basal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S W Menzies; K Westerhoff; H Rabinovitz; A W Kopf; W H McCarthy; B Katz
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2000-08

7.  Results of a nationwide dermoscopy survey investigating the prevalence, advantages and disadvantages of dermoscopy use among Australian dermatologists.

Authors:  Supriya S Venugopal; H Peter Soyer; Scott W Menzies
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 2.875

8.  Frequency of excisions and yields of malignant skin tumors in a population-based screening intervention of 360,288 whole-body examinations.

Authors:  Annika Waldmann; Sandra Nolte; Alan C Geller; Alexander Katalinic; Martin A Weinstock; Beate Volkmer; Ruediger Greinert; Eckhard W Breitbart
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2012-08

9.  Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting.

Authors:  M E Vestergaard; P Macaskill; P E Holt; S W Menzies
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 9.302

10.  Dermatoscopy of basal cell carcinoma: morphologic variability of global and local features and accuracy of diagnosis.

Authors:  Davide Altamura; Scott W Menzies; Giuseppe Argenziano; Iris Zalaudek; H Peter Soyer; Francesco Sera; Michelle Avramidis; Kathryn DeAmbrosis; Maria Concetta Fargnoli; Ketty Peris
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 11.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.