Literature DB >> 31383495

Prevalence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Between Two Different Femoral Component Designs Used in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Katherine S Christensen1, Daniel I Wicker2, Christian M Wight3, Christian P Christensen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic femur fractures are a well-documented complication following direct anterior uncemented total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare the prevalence of postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures between 2 different femoral component designs used in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: Beginning in February 2015, a single fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon performed 361 consecutive direct anterior total hip replacements using a flat, single-taper, wedged femoral implant. In June 2016, that same surgeon, using the exact same surgical technique and postoperative weight-bearing protocol, began using a dual-taper, hydroxyapatite-coated implant for 789 consecutive hips. The patients were carefully monitored for 3 months after surgery to identify the frequency of periprosthetic femur fractures. A Fisher's exact test was used to determine if the prevalence of periprosthetic femur fractures differed between the 2 implant designs.
RESULTS: Five of 361 (1.4%) patients sustained proximal femur fractures at an average of 19.6 days postoperatively in the first group, all demonstrating a Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fracture and requiring femoral revision. No patients (0/789, 0%) in the second cohort sustained a postoperative, periprosthetic fracture (P = .006).
CONCLUSION: In this comparison of 2 consecutive cohorts, the dual-taper, hydroxyapatite-coated implant had a statistically significant lower postoperative periprosthetic fracture rate than a flat, single-taper, wedged design.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; direct anterior; fracture; implant design; total hip replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31383495     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Varus malalignment of short femoral stem not associated with post-hip arthroplasty fracture.

Authors:  Scott T Nishioka; Samantha N Andrews; Kristin Mathews; Cass K Nakasone
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Radiological Outcomes and Bone Remodeling Outcomes Between Proximal Coated Single-Wedge New Stem and Full Coated Dual-Wedge Classic Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hongpeng Hu; Zeming Liu; Bo Liu; Xuzhuang Ding; Sikai Liu; Tao Wu; Wenhui Ma; Yongtai Han
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-01-31

3.  Reduced Incidence of Perioperative Periprosthetic Fractures Using Hybrid Rasp-Impaction Broaching Over Impaction Broaching When Using the Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  James M Hartford; Bradley P Graw; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 4.  Periprosthetic fracture as a late mode of failure of the Anatomique Benoist Girard II femoral prosthesis.

Authors:  Jonathan S Mulford; Ronnie Mathew; David Penn; Alana R Cuthbert; Richard De Steiger
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.025

5.  The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Schopper; Matthias Luger; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.