Literature DB >> 31383241

Information on Bedtimes and Wake Times Improves the Relation Between Self-Reported and Objective Assessments of Sleep in Adults.

Marie-Pierre St-Onge1,2,3, Ayanna Campbell1, Ismel Salazar1, Theresa Pizinger1, Ming Liao4, Brooke Aggarwal2,4.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation between self-reported and objective measures of total sleep time (TST) in adults and examine whether sex, race/ethnicity, and weight status influence this association.
METHODS: Participants were individuals who screened for sleep intervention studies, providing > 7 days of wrist actigraphy sleep data (TSTobj) and reporting sleep duration (TSTPSQI) using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire (n = 53 men, 60 women; 59% minority/Hispanics; age 30.9 ± 9.7 years; body mass index 26.2 ± 3.2 kg/m2). In addition, TSTbed/wake was calculated as the difference between bedtime and waketime, minus the time to fall asleep, from the PSQI. Univariate regression analyses were performed to assess the relation between TSTobj and TSTPSQI and TSTbed/wake and compare the relation by sex, race, and ethnicity. Bland-Altman tests were done to assess bias by sex, race/ethnicity, weight status, and sleep quality.
RESULTS: TSTbed/wake correlated with TSTobj (r = .57, P < .0001). TSTPSQI and TSTbed/wake were greater than TSTobj (0.63 ± 0.99 hours and 0.79 ± 0.76 hours, respectively, both P < .0001). The difference between TSTPSQI and TSTobj did not vary by sex (β = .12, P = .52), race/ethnicity (β = .15, P = .48), age (β = -.01, P = .27), or body mass index (β = .04, P = .13) whereas that between TSTbed/wake and TSTobj varied by age (β = -.020, P = .0051), BMI (β = .054, P = .0021), race/ethnicity (β = .36, P = .021), and sleep efficiency (β = -.089, P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Calculating TST using self-reported bedtimes and wake times provided TST estimate that correlated with TSTobj but greater over-reporting occurred in younger and heavier individuals, non-whites or Hispanics, and those with low sleep efficiency. In clinical and research settings, asking individuals to report bedtimes, wake times, and length of time to fall asleep may more accurately estimate TST than asking about sleep duration alone.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Sleep Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index; actigraphy; sleep duration; subjective sleep

Year:  2019        PMID: 31383241      PMCID: PMC6622506          DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.7888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med        ISSN: 1550-9389            Impact factor:   4.062


  14 in total

1.  Sleep duration and obesity among adults: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Yili Wu; Long Zhai; Dongfeng Zhang
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.492

2.  Comparison of Self-Reported Sleep Duration With Actigraphy: Results From the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos Sueño Ancillary Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Cespedes; Frank B Hu; Susan Redline; Bernard Rosner; Carmela Alcantara; Jianwen Cai; Martica H Hall; Jose S Loredo; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Alberto R Ramos; Kathryn J Reid; Neomi A Shah; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Phyllis C Zee; Rui Wang; Sanjay R Patel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Using the Berlin Questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  N C Netzer; R A Stoohs; C M Netzer; K Clark; K P Strohl
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-10-05       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Self-reported and measured sleep duration: how similar are they?

Authors:  Diane S Lauderdale; Kristen L Knutson; Lijing L Yan; Kiang Liu; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Associations of self-reported and actigraphy-assessed sleep characteristics with body mass index and waist circumference in adults: moderation by gender.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Mezick; Rena R Wing; Jeanne M McCaffery
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Comparison of sleep parameters from actigraphy and polysomnography in older women: the SOF study.

Authors:  Terri Blackwell; Susan Redline; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Jennifer L Schneider; Susan Surovec; Nathan L Johnson; Jane A Cauley; Katie L Stone
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Unequal burden of sleep-related obesity among black and white Americans.

Authors:  Girardin Jean-Louis; Shawn Youngstedt; Michael Grandner; Natasha J Williams; Daniel Sarpong; Ferdinand Zizi; Gbenga Ogedegbe
Journal:  Sleep Health       Date:  2015-09

8.  Discrepancies Between Self-Reported Usual Sleep Duration and Objective Measures of Total Sleep Time in Treatment-Seeking Overweight and Obese Individuals.

Authors:  Erin O'Brien; Chantelle Hart; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.964

Review 9.  The cost of circadian desynchrony: Evidence, insights and open questions.

Authors:  Alexander C West; David A Bechtold
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Validation of self-reported sleep against actigraphy.

Authors:  Jennifer Girschik; Lin Fritschi; Jane Heyworth; Flavie Waters
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.211

View more
  2 in total

1.  Discrepancies between self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Katie L J Cederberg; Brianna G Mathison; Morgan L Schuetz; Robert W Motl
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  A Mediterranean Dietary Pattern Predicts Better Sleep Quality in US Women from the American Heart Association Go Red for Women Strategically Focused Research Network.

Authors:  Faris M Zuraikat; Nour Makarem; Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Huaqing Xi; Alekha Akkapeddi; Brooke Aggarwal
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.