| Literature DB >> 31382709 |
Rita Benítez1, Nares Trakooljul2, Yolanda Núñez1, Beatriz Isabel3, Eduard Murani2, Eduardo De Mercado4, Emilio Gómez-Izquierdo4, Juan García-Casco1, Clemente López-Bote3, Klaus Wimmers2, Cristina Óvilo5.
Abstract
In this study, we analyzed the effects of breed, diet energy source, and their interaction on adipose tissue transcriptome in growing Iberian and Duroc pigs. The study comprised 29 Iberian and 19 Duroc males, which were kept under identical management conditions except the nutritional treatment. Two isoenergetic diets were used with 6% high oleic sunflower oil (HO) or carbohydrates (CH) as energy sources. All animals were slaughtered after 47 days of treatment at an average live weight of 51.2 kg. Twelve animals from each breed (six fed each diet) were employed for ham subcutaneous adipose tissue RNA-Seq analysis. The data analysis was performed using two different bioinformatic pipelines. We detected 837 and 1456 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) according to breed, depending on the pipeline. Due to the strong effect of breed on transcriptome, the effect of the diet was separately evaluated in the two breeds. We identified 207 and 57 DEGs depending on diet in Iberian and Duroc pigs, respectively. A joint analysis of both effects allowed the detection of some breed-diet interactions on transcriptome, which were inferred from RNA-Seq and quantitative PCR data. The functional analysis showed the enrichment of functions related to growth and tissue development, inflammatory response, immune cell trafficking, and carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and allowed the identification of potential regulators. The results indicate different effects of diet on adipose tissue gene expression between breeds, affecting relevant biological pathways.Entities:
Keywords: Iberian pig; adipose tissue; breed; diet; inflammation; interaction; nutrigenomics; transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31382709 PMCID: PMC6723240 DOI: 10.3390/genes10080589
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Technical and biological validation of RNA-Seq results by quantitative PCR (qPCR): genes, statistical significance, and fold change values (FC) obtained with both techniques for the breed, diet, and interaction effects, and Pearson correlations between expression values obtained from both techniques.
| BREED EFFECTS (Ib vs. Du) | DIET EFFECTS (HO vs. CH) | INTERACTION | CORRELATION | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBERIAN | DUROC | |||||||||||||||
| GENES | RNA Seq | qPCR | RNA Seq | qPCR | RNA Seq | qPCR | DESEQ2 | qPCR | ||||||||
| FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | FC | Correlation | ||||||||||
|
| 0.001 | 1.81 | 0.0005 | 2.76 | 0.89 | 1.11 | 0.003 | 1.97 | 0.99 | 1.13 | 0.31 | 1.38 | 0.99 | 0.02 | 0.81 | 3.47 × 10−6 |
|
| 0.001 | 1.55 | <0.0001 | 5.02 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.63 | 1.08 | 0.49 | 0.91 | 0.51 | 0.86 | 0.99 | 0.42 | 0.64 | 0.001 |
|
| 0.001 | 1.80 | <0.0001 | 5.51 | 0.007 | 2.57 | 0.02 | 1.61 | 0.90 | 1.34 | 0.001 | 1.31 | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.68 | 4.00 × 10−4 |
|
| 0.90 | 1.71 | 0.066 | 1.10 | 0.99 | 0.71 | <0.0001 | 0.01 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.01 | 1.03 | 3.51 × 10−6 * | <0.0001 | 0.79 | 1.23 × 10−5 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.11 | 0.001 | 0.13 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.02 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 2.78 | 0.02 | 1.58 | 0.19 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.002 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.67 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.28 | 0.48 | 0.08 | 3.32 | 0.07 | 1.31 | 0.20 | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.001 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.46 | <0.0001 | 0.58 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.21 | 0.61 | 0.99 | 1.15 | 0.05 | 1.23 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 070 | 0.0002 |
|
| 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.1 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.31 | 0.59 | 0.02 | 3.23 | 0.8 | 1.15 | 0.41 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 5.46 × 10−5 |
|
| 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 4.49 | 0.001 | 6.66 | 0.02 | 3.86 | 0.11 | 2.14 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 0.96 | 2.42 × 10−6 |
|
| 0.19 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 1.51 | 0.02 | 1.61 | 0.01 | 1.36 | 0.02 | 0.56 | 0.004 | 0.89 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.77 | 0.004 |
|
| 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.11 | 0.39 | 0.008 | 2.14 | 0.03 | 2.97 | 0.02 | 3.85 | 0.09 | 1.34 | 0.005 | 0.02 | 0.70 | 0.001 |
Note: Ib = Iberian; Du = Duroc; HO = high oleic diet; CH = carbohydrate diet; * = statistically significant at q-value < 0.05.
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) -based list of pathways in the set of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) according to breed (p-value < 0.01, z-score > 2 or <−2).
| Canonical Pathways | Ratio 1 | z-Score 2 | Molecules | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glutathione Redox Reactions I | 0.008 | 4/24 | −2 |
|
| ILK Signaling | 0.001 | 16/205 | 2 |
|
| Actin Cytoskeleton Signaling | 0.002 | 17/234 | 2.111 |
|
| Opioid Signaling Pathway | 0.01 | 16/250 | 2.138 |
|
| Cardiac Hypertrophy Signaling (Enhanced) | 0.0007 | 31/498 | 2.502 |
|
| Calcium Signaling | 0.00001 | 24/206 | 2.887 |
|
1 Ratio is the number of DEGs in a pathway divided by the number of genes comprised in the same pathway. 2 Positive z-scores predict an overall increase in the activity of the pathway in Duroc pigs, while negative z-scores indicate a prediction of an overall increase in the pathway activity in Iberian pigs.
IPA-based list of activated upstream regulators (sorted by z-score) in the set of DEGs according to breed (p-value < 0.01 and z-score > 2 or <−2).
| Upstream Regulator | Expression Log Ratio (Duroc/Iberian) | Molecule Type | Activation Z-Score 1 | Molecules in Dataset | Related Functions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| KDM5A | transcription regulator | −3.357 | 3.28 × 10−5 | 15 | Epigenetic regulation of inflammation | |
| DNMT3A | enzyme | −3.051 | 2.74 × 10−6 | 16 | Inflammation and lipid metabolism | |
| AHR | ligand-dependent nuclear receptor | −2.702 | 9.15 × 10−10 | 34 | Inflammatory and immune response | |
| SMTNL1 | other | −2.668 | 2.13 × 10−8 | 10 | ||
| PTEN | phosphatase | −2.569 | 0.003 | 21 | Cell migration, survival and proliferation | |
| HNF4A | 1.212 | transcription regulator | −2.53 | 5.71 × 10−5 | 33 | Inflammation |
| NR1H3 | ligand-dependent nuclear receptor | −2.294 | 0.01 | 13 | Inflammation and fat cell metabolism | |
| NOS2 | enzyme | −2.145 | 8.99 × 10−4 | 15 | Inflammation and insulin resistance | |
| MED1 | transcription regulator | −2.138 | 0.001 | 12 | Activation of gene transcription | |
| RBPJ | transcription regulator | −2.101 | 0.0002 | 13 | Polarization of macrophages | |
|
| ||||||
| Bvht | other | 3.148 | 2.16 × 10−4 | 10 | ||
| ZNF106 | other | 3 | 1.68 × 10−5 | 9 | ||
| INSIG1 | other | 3 | 0.004 | 9 | Insulin signaling | |
| ERBB2 | kinase | 2.867 | 0.002 | 30 | ||
| MEF2C | transcription regulator | 2.704 | 1.79 × 10−12 | 17 | Growth | |
| MYOD1 | transcription regulator | 2.53 | 2.19 × 10−9 | 14 | Growth | |
| TGFB1 | growth factor | 2.453 | 3.50 × 10−7 | 20 | Growth and inflammation | |
| HNF1A | transcription regulator | 2.439 | 1.90 × 10−4 | 47 | Cholesterol metabolism | |
| IL1R1 | transmembrane receptor | 2.39 | 7.36 × 10−3 | 22 | Inflammation | |
| SMAD3 | transcription regulator | 2.353 | 3.01 × 10−5 | 6 | Cell differentiation | |
| Akt | group | 2.311 | 1.08 × 10−4 | 6 | signaling of insulin and others receptors | |
| IGFBP2 | other | 2.219 | 0.01 | 17 | Growth | |
| STAT5a/b | group | 2.213 | 0.006 | 15 | ||
| SRF | transcription regulator | 2.204 | 3.01 × 10−7 | 6 | Cell proliferation and differentiation | |
| BDNF | growth factor | 2.202 | 0.001 | 7 | Growth | |
| FSHR | G-protein coupled receptor | 2.177 | 0.008 | 5 | ||
| RB1 | transcription regulator | 2.165 | 1.39 × 10−4 | 5 | ||
| MAPK8 | kinase | 2.138 | 0.002 | 7 | Regulation of development | |
| ESR1 | ligand-dependent nuclear receptor | 2.093 | 1.20 × 10−7 | 26 | Growth | |
| TBX5 | transcription regulator | 2.091 | 3.75 × 10−8 | 11 | Regulation of development | |
| COL6A1 | 0.68 | other | 2.064 | 3.56 × 10−6 | 6 | Growth |
| MET | 0.799 | kinase | 2.039 | 0.001 | 25 | Development and organogenesis |
| PELP1 | other | 2 | 0.003 | 10 | Inflammatory signaling | |
1 Positive z-scores predict an overall increase in the activity of the regulator in Duroc pigs, while negative z-scores indicate a prediction of an overall increase in the regulator activity in Iberian pigs.
Figure 1Regulator effects networks predicted as activated in Iberian pigs.
Figure 2Regulator effects network predicted as activated in Duroc pigs.
IPA-based list of pathways in the set of DEGs according to diet in Iberian and Duroc pigs (p-value ≤ 0.01).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Complement System | 2.45471 × 10−8 | 7/37 | −0.816 |
|
| Acetyl-CoA Biosynthesis I (Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex) | 2.0893 × 10−5 | 3/7 |
| |
| Agranulocyte Adhesion and Diapedesis | 0.00024 | 8/192 |
| |
| Mineralocorticoid Biosynthesis | 0.0034 | 2/10 |
| |
| Interferon Signaling | 0.004 | 3/36 |
| |
| Glucocorticoid Biosynthesis | 0.004 | 2/11 |
| |
| Aldosterone Signaling in Epithelial Cells | 0.004 | 6/174 |
| |
| Hepatic Fibrosis/Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation | 0.005 | 6/186 |
| |
| Androgen Biosynthesis | 0.006 | 2/14 |
| |
| Protein Ubiquitination Pathway | 0.009 | 7/271 |
| |
| Glucocorticoid Receptor Signaling | 0.01 | 8/350 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Protein Kinase A Signaling | 0.002 | 5/400 |
| |
| nNOS Signaling in Neurons | 0.005 | 2/47 |
| |
| Calcium Signaling | 0.01 | 3/206 |
|
1 Ratio is the number of DEGs in a pathway divided by the number of genes in the same pathway. 2 Positive z-scores predict an overall increase in the activity of the pathway in carbohydrate diet, while negative z-scores indicate a prediction of an overall increase in activity in high oleic diet.
Figure 3Predicted causal network for the DEG and master regulator SERPINE1.