Literature DB >> 31381804

Assessing the Differences in Measurement of Degree of Spondylolisthesis Between Supine MRI and Erect X-Ray: An Institutional Analysis of 255 Cases.

Mohammed Ali Alvi1,2, Adeeb Sebai1,2, Yagiz Yolcu1,2, Waseem Wahood1,2, Benjamin D Elder2, Timothy Kaufmann3, Mohamad Bydon1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Degenerative spondylolisthesis is the displacement of one vertebral body over the adjacent one. While standing and flexion-extension X-rays are preferred for determining listhesis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often utilized to assess the compression of nerve root or spinal cord.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the difference in radiographic measurements of spondylolisthesis between X-rays and MRI.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records and radiographic images of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of spondylolisthesis undergoing operation in 2016. Primary variable of interest was the degree of slippage as per the Meyerding method. Agreement between the 2 reviewers was assessed using the 2-way intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for slippage percentage and Cohen's Kappa for grade. Agreement of Meyerding grade between the 2 imaging techniques was assessed using Cohen's Kappa, while the slip percentage measured for each technique was compared using a Bland-Altman (BA) plot, mean difference (MD), and 1-way ICC.
RESULTS: A total of 255 cases were analyzed. ICC between the 2 reviewers was found to be 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-0.83, P < .001) for X-ray and 0.76 (95% CI = 0.66-0.83, P < .001) for MRI. Agreement between X-ray and MRI for grading of spondylolisthesis was found to be poor (kappa = 0.32, P < .001). BA plot between X-ray and MRI measurements revealed an MD of 4.4% (95% limits of agreement: -10.3% to 19.3%) with 5.16% observations outside the limits of agreement and 1-way ICC of 0.35 showing poor agreement.
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the discrepancy of spondylolisthesis grade measurements between weight-bearing X-ray and nonweight-bearing MRI. Careful evaluation of both imaging technique is warranted to determine the final severity of pathology and tailoring of management plan. © Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Spondylolisthesis; X-Ray

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31381804     DOI: 10.1093/ons/opz180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 2332-4252            Impact factor:   2.703


  2 in total

1.  Effect evaluation of acupuncture combined with nerve block treatment on patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Shuai Dai; Aimin Yang
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-06-15

2.  A Proposed Personalized Spine Care Protocol (SpineScreen) to Treat Visualized Pain Generators: An Illustrative Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Reoperations between Targeted Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery, Minimally Invasive TLIF and Open Laminectomy.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Ivo Abraham; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Albert E Telfeian; Morgan P Lorio; Stefan Hellinger; Martin Knight; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira De Carvalho; Max Rogério Freitas Ramos; Álvaro Dowling; Manuel Rodriguez Garcia; Fauziyya Muhammad; Namath Hussain; Vicky Yamamoto; Babak Kateb; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.