Background: Symptoms associated with midline lymphedema are not fully understood and it is unclear if symptoms associated with swelling in the head and neck are similar to those associated with swelling in the truncal region of the body. Objectives: Describe symptoms experienced by those with head and neck and truncal lymphedema. Compare symptom presence, intensity, and distress among those two groups and participants with no lymphedema. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study administered by online survey. Results: Nonlymphedema participants were younger than the lymphedema groups. Those with truncal lymphedema took more diuretic medications than the other groups. Participants with truncal lymphedema experienced a greater number of symptoms than the other groups (p < 0.001). These symptoms were also more severe and intense (p < 0.001). Fourteen symptoms distinguished the truncal group from the other two groups (p < 0.001). Nine symptoms differentiated the head and neck group from the other groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: These preliminary findings support that symptom profiles differ among those with lymphedema and those without lymphedema. The number, type, severity, and intensity of symptoms vary based upon the location of lymphedema. The need to use two lymphedema anatomical classifications (head and neck and truncal) instead of one classification (midline) when assessing lymphedema-related symptoms is also supported.
Background: Symptoms associated with midline lymphedema are not fully understood and it is unclear if symptoms associated with swelling in the head and neck are similar to those associated with swelling in the truncal region of the body. Objectives: Describe symptoms experienced by those with head and neck and truncal lymphedema. Compare symptom presence, intensity, and distress among those two groups and participants with no lymphedema. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study administered by online survey. Results: Nonlymphedema participants were younger than the lymphedema groups. Those with truncal lymphedema took more diuretic medications than the other groups. Participants with truncal lymphedema experienced a greater number of symptoms than the other groups (p < 0.001). These symptoms were also more severe and intense (p < 0.001). Fourteen symptoms distinguished the truncal group from the other two groups (p < 0.001). Nine symptoms differentiated the head and neck group from the other groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: These preliminary findings support that symptom profiles differ among those with lymphedema and those without lymphedema. The number, type, severity, and intensity of symptoms vary based upon the location of lymphedema. The need to use two lymphedema anatomical classifications (head and neck and truncal) instead of one classification (midline) when assessing lymphedema-related symptoms is also supported.
Entities:
Keywords:
head and neck cancer; lymphedema; midline; symptoms; truncal
Authors: Jie Deng; Barbara A Murphy; Mary S Dietrich; Robert J Sinard; Kyle Mannion; Sheila H Ridner Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Peter B Viehoff; Petra D C Gielink; Robert J Damstra; Yvonne F Heerkens; Dorine C van Ravensberg; Martino H A Neumann Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Pia Klernäs; Aina Johnsson; Vibeke Horstmann; Linda J Kristjanson; Karin Johansson Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Sheila H Ridner; Mary S Dietrich; Jie Deng; Sandra L Ettema; Barbara Murphy Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 3.603