Literature DB >> 31380676

Does atypical interoception following physical change contribute to sex differences in mental illness?

Jennifer Murphy1, Essi Viding2, Geoffrey Bird1.   

Abstract

Sex differences in the prevalence and presentation of mental illnesses are well documented. Women are more likely to experience common mental health disorders (e.g., anxiety and depression), and when they experience these conditions, they often present differently to men (e.g., women are more likely to report somatic complaints). Periods of physical and hormonal change (e.g., adolescence, pregnancy, and menopause) are particular risk periods for the development of mental illness in women. In this article, we advance the proposal that interoception (the perception of the body's internal state) is one mechanism that might explain sex differences in vulnerability to mental illness. We argue that known sex differences in interoception, whereby women, compared to men, report heightened attention to internal signals coupled with worse interoceptive accuracy, may result from the increased amount of physical and hormonal change women experience across development. Given links between interoception and mental health, we propose that sex differences in interoception may partly explain sex differences in the prevalence and presentation of certain mental illnesses. Further scrutiny of this proposal may aid our understanding of sex differences in mental illness with implications for assessment, early intervention, and the development of novel treatment approaches. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31380676     DOI: 10.1037/rev0000158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  9 in total

1.  Gender Brain Structural Differences and Interoception.

Authors:  Mariachiara Longarzo; Giulia Mele; Vincenzo Alfano; Marco Salvatore; Carlo Cavaliere
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Affect and Social Judgment: The Roles of Physiological Reactivity and Interoceptive Sensitivity.

Authors:  Mallory J Feldman; Erika Siegel; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Karen S Quigley; Jolie B Wormwood
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  Cardiac Cycle Affects the Asymmetric Value Updating in Instrumental Reward Learning.

Authors:  Kenta Kimura; Noriaki Kanayama; Asako Toyama; Kentaro Katahira
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 4.  Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review.

Authors:  Rebecca Brewer; Jennifer Murphy; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Gender Differences in Psychological Symptoms and Psychotherapeutic Processes in Japanese Children.

Authors:  Toshio Kawai; Yuka Suzuki; Chihiro Hatanaka; Hisae Konakawa; Yasuhiro Tanaka; Aya Uchida
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Acute physical-activity related increases in interoceptive ability are not enhanced with simultaneous interoceptive attention.

Authors:  A Wallman-Jones; E R Palser; V Benzing; M Schmidt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Altered Interoceptive Sensibility in Adults With Chronic Tic Disorder.

Authors:  Ashruta Narapareddy; Michelle R Eckland; Heather R Riordan; Carissa J Cascio; David A Isaacs
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.435

8.  Association Between Interoception and Emotion Regulation in Individuals With Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  Andrzej Jakubczyk; Elisa M Trucco; Anna Klimkiewicz; Jakub Skrzeszewski; Hubert Suszek; Justyna Zaorska; Malwina Nowakowska; Aneta Michalska; Marcin Wojnar; Maciej Kopera
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Validation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) questionnaire in hospitalized patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Michael Eggart; Jennifer Todd; Juan Valdés-Stauber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.