Literature DB >> 31380498

Using minimally invasive techniques adds to the value equation for select patients.

Jung Kee Mok1, Catherine Himo Gang2, Sheeraz Qureshi1,2, Steven J McAnany1,2.   

Abstract

Conditions of the spine are one of the most prevalent causes of global disability, and result in a considerable portion of total health expenditures. Surgical treatment of the spine has been demonstrated in multiple studies to be a cost-effective treatment option for many patients, especially with continuing improvements in surgical technique and instrumentation. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), in particular, has evolved as a valuable option in treating certain patients. Numerous studies have analyzed minimally invasive techniques in regards to cost-effectiveness and other purported advantages. These advantages include conduciveness to outpatient settings, better perioperative and immediate post-operative benefits, and faster time to recovery. This article will describe the current literature on the advantages of MISS, specifically in regards to value and cost savings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS); ambulatory spine surgery; cost-effectiveness; patient selection; recovery; value

Year:  2019        PMID: 31380498      PMCID: PMC6626757          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.05.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  1 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?

Authors:  Charles A Reitman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.