Literature DB >> 31380489

Interbody options in lumbar fusion.

Dil V Patel1, Joon S Yoo1, Sailee S Karmarkar1, Eric H Lamoutte1, Kern Singh1.   

Abstract

Interbody devices have revolutionized lumbar fusion surgery by enhancing mechanical stability, optimizing sagittal parameters, and maximizing fusion potential. There are several lumbar interbody fusion approaches available for varying pathologic etiologies, surgical index levels, or due to surgeon preference. With the advancement of spinal instrumentation and interbody devices, a variety of cage materials and dimensions have been engineered to accommodate various lumbar fusion approaches. The efficacy of a fusion is dependent on the shape, size, and material makeup of that interbody device. Since there are numerous cages available in today's market, it is important to find the optimal cage to best accommodate specific lumbar fusion cases. This review will explain the properties and future advancements of various interbody devices available for lumbar fusions.

Keywords:  Interbody devices; bone grafts; lumbar fusion; osteobiologics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31380489      PMCID: PMC6626748          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  7 in total

1.  Effects of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation on symptoms and quality of life of patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Hongda Li; Zhuo Wang; Jiwei Zhao; Shuangshi Wu; Hao Sun; Le Hu; Xinmin Feng; Yongxiang Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Improving the Management of Patients with Osteoporosis Undergoing Spinal Fusion: The Need for a Bone Mineral Density-Matched Interbody Cage.

Authors:  Steven M Falowski; Sebastian F Koga; Trent Northcutt; Laszlo Garamszegi; Jeremi Leasure; Jon E Block
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2021-12-14

Review 3.  Can activated titanium interbody cages accelerate or enhance spinal fusion? a review of the literature and a design for clinical trials.

Authors:  Nathaniel Toop; Connor Gifford; Rouzbeh Motiei-Langroudi; Arghavan Farzadi; Daniel Boulter; Reza Forghani; H Francis Farhadi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Evaluation of the contact surface between vertebral endplate and 3D printed patient-specific cage vs commercial cage.

Authors:  Renan Jose Rodrigues Fernandes; Aaron Gee; Andrew James Kanawati; Fawaz Siddiqi; Parham Rasoulinejad; Radovan Zdero; Christopher Stewart Bailey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Vadim A Byvaltsev; Andrei A Kalinin; Morgan B Giers; Valerii V Shepelev; Yurii Ya Pestryakov; Mikhail Yu Biryuchkov
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

6.  Mineralized collagen-modified PMMA cement enhances bone integration and reduces fibrous encapsulation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Long Yang; Jianjun Kong; Zhiye Qiu; Tieliang Shang; Siyu Chen; Rui Zhao; Maria Grazia Raucci; Xiao Yang; Zhanyong Wu
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2019-12-02

7.  A Long-Term Follow-up, Multicenter, Comparative Study of the Radiologic, and Clinical Results Between a CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 Bioactive Glass Ceramics (BGS-7) Intervertebral Spacer and Titanium Cage in 1-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Jae Hyup Lee; Sun Ki Kim; Sung Shik Kang; Seung Jung Han; Choon-Ki Lee; Bong-Soon Chang
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.723

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.