| Literature DB >> 31380364 |
Mathieu Gueugnon1,2, Paul J Stapley3, Anais Gouteron2,4,5, Cécile Lecland6, Claire Morisset1,2, Jean-Marie Casillas1,2,4,5, Paul Ornetti1,2,4,7, Davy Laroche1,2,4.
Abstract
Lower-limb intersegmental coordination is a complex component of human walking. Aging may result in impairments of motor control and coordination contributing to the decline in mobility inducing loss of autonomy. Investigating intersegmental coordination could therefore provide insights into age-related changes in neuromuscular control of gait. However, it is unknown whether the age-related declines in gait performance relates to intersegmental coordination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of aging on the coordination of lower limb kinematics and kinetics during walking at a conformable speed. We then assessed the body kinematics and kinetics from gait analyses of 84 volunteers from 25 to 85 years old when walking was performed at their self-selected speeds. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to assess lower-limb intersegmental coordination and to evaluate the planar covariation of the Shank-Thigh and Foot-Shank segments. Ankle and knee stiffness were also estimated. Age-related effects on planar covariation parameters was evaluated using multiple linear regressions (i.e., without a priori age group determination) adjusted to normalized self-selected gait velocity. Colinearity between parameters was assessed using a variation inflation factor (VIF) and those with a VIF < 5 were entered in the analysis. Normalized gait velocity significantly decreased with aging (r = -0.24; P = 0.028). Planar covariation of inter-segmental coordination was consistent across age (99.3 ± 0.24% of explained variance of PCA). Significant relationships were found between age and intersegmental foot-shank coordination, range of motion of the ankle, maximal power of the knee, and the ankle. Lower-limb coordination was modified with age, particularly the coordination between foot, and shank. Such modifications may influence the ankle motion and thus, ankle power. This observation may explain the decrease in the ankle plantar flexor strength mainly reported in the literature. We therefore hypothesize that this modification of coordination constitutes a neuromuscular adaptation of gait control accompanying a loss of ankle strength and amplitude by increasing the knee power in order to maintain gait efficiency. We propose that foot-shank coordination might represent a valid outcome measure to estimate the efficacy of rehabilitative strategies and to evaluate their efficiency in restoring lower-limb synergies during walking.Entities:
Keywords: aging; biomechanics; gait analysis; locomotor control; panar covariation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31380364 PMCID: PMC6652268 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Figure 1(A) Representation of the 3D recording of locomotion with the marker set, with the extracted markers trajectories (Top), and the recorded ground reaction forces (Bottom). (B) Details of the joint rotation, joint range of motion, and covariation plane. (C) Details of joint power and moment for computing stiffness.
Population characteristics.
| Age (years) | 60.7 ± 15.2 |
| Weight (kg) | 68.5 ± 13.3 |
| Height (cm) | 164.6 ± 9 |
| Gait speed (m.s−1) | 1.09 ± 0.16 |
| Fr | 0.14 ± 0.02 |
| Step Width (m) | 0.075 ± 0.02 |
| SD Step Width (m) | 0.018 ± 0.01 |
| Step length (m) | 0.59 ± 0.06 |
| SD Step length (m) | 0.021 ± 0.01 |
| AmpCoM (cm) | 2.82 ± 0.52 |
| ROMHip (°) | 40.2 ± 4.56 |
| ROMKnee (°) | 55.6 ± 4.52 |
| ROMAnkle (°) | 26.1 ± 4.93 |
| PHip (W) | 1.13 ± 0.37 |
| PKnee (W) | 0.49 ± 0.21 |
| PAnkle (W) | 2.95 ± 0.67 |
| KKnee (Nm.kg−1.deg−1) | 0.07 ± 0.07 |
| KAnkle (Nm.kg−1.deg−1) | 0.06 ± 0.03 |
| VarCovPlane (%) | 99.3 ± 0.24 |
| μ1 | 0.44 ± 0.04 |
| μ3 | -0.16 ± 0.03 |
Fr, Froude number corresponding to a normalized self-selected gait speed; Amp.
Multivariate linear regression model between kinematics and kinetics variable and age.
| ROMAnkle | −1.55 | −3.98 | <0.001 | 0.22 | −2.3; −0.8 | 2.18 |
| PKnee | 16.0 | 2.10 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 1.1; 31 | 1.37 |
| PAnkle | −11.7 | −4.13 | <0.001 | 0.14 | −17.3; −6.2 | 1.56 |
| VarCovPlane | −23.7 | −3.09 | 0.002 | 0.09 | −38.8; −8.7 | 1.84 |
| μ3 | −135.5 | −2.65 | 0.008 | 0.05 | −235.7; −35.4 | 1.11 |
ROM.
Figure 2(A) Mean (solid lines) and standard deviation (dotted lines) waveforms of sagittal ankle joint excursions for people of 25–49 (light gray)/50–64 (medium gray)/65–85 (dark gray) years old. (B) Mean waveforms of knee power for people of 25–49 (light gray)/50–64 (medium gray)/65–85 (dark gray) years old. (C) Mean waveforms of sagittal ankle power for people of 25–49 (light gray)/50–64 (medium gray)/65–85 (dark gray) years old. Relationships between age and ankle range of motion (D), knee maximal power (E), ankle maximal power (F). Partial R2 and p-Value are provided. We choose to represent 3 classes of age in order to highlight change due to age.
Figure 3(A) Representation of the mean planar covariation of the lower-limb segments for people of 25–49 (light gray)/50–64 (medium gray)/65–85 (dark gray) years old. (B) Relationship between the orientation (index) of the covariation plane and the age for people of 25–49 (light gray)/50–64 (medium gray)/65–85 (dark gray) years old. (C) Relationship between the variance of the covariance plane and the age for people of 25–49 (light gray)/50–64 (medium gray)/65–85 (dark gray) years old. Partial R2 is provided. We choose to represent 3 classes of age in order to highlight change due to age.