| Literature DB >> 31380149 |
Xiaoyue Tang1, Juan Li2, Wei-Gang Zhao2, Haidan Sun1, Zhengguang Guo1, Li Jing1, Zhufang She3, Tao Yuan2, Shuai-Nan Liu3, Quan Liu3, Yong Fu2, Wei Sun1.
Abstract
White adipose tissue (WAT) plays a significant role in energy metabolism and the obesity epidemic. In this study, we sought to (1) profile the mouse WAT proteome with advanced 2DLC/MS/MS approach, (2) provide insight into WAT function based on protein functional annotation, and (3) predict potentially secreted proteins. A label-free 2DLC/MS/MS proteomic approach was used to identify the WAT proteome from female mouse WAT. A total of 6,039 proteins in WAT were identified, among which 5,160 were quantified (spanning a magnitude of 106) using an intensity-based absolute quantification algorithm, and 3,117 proteins were reported by proteomics technology for the first time in WAT. To comprehensively analyze the function of WAT, the proteins were divided into three quantiles based on abundance and we found that proteins of different abundance performed different functions. High-abundance proteins (the top 90%, 1,219 proteins) were involved in energy metabolism; middle-abundance proteins (90-99%, 2,273 proteins) were involved in the regulation of protein synthesis; and low-abundance proteins (99-100%, 1,668 proteins) were associated with lipid metabolism and WAT beiging. Furthermore, 800 proteins were predicted by SignalP4.0 to have signal peptides, 265 proteins had never been reported, and five have been reported as adipokines. The above results provide a large dataset of the normal mouse WAT proteome, which might be useful for WAT function research.Entities:
Keywords: Label-free; Mouse; Proteome; White adipose tissue
Year: 2019 PMID: 31380149 PMCID: PMC6661141 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Proteome profile analysis of the normal WAT proteome.
(A) Venn diagram of protein identification in three technical replicates. (B) Technical variation of the three replicates. (C) Quantitative protein abundance range in WAT samples with the iBAQ algorithm.
The top ten most abundant proteins in the mouse WAT proteome.
| Accession number | Name | iBAQ value | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum albumin | 2.87E+05 | 9.33 | |
| Carbonic anhydrase 3 | 1.21E+05 | 1.68 | |
| Polymerase I and transcript release factor | 8.01E+04 | 1.67 | |
| Tropomyosin beta chain | 8.72E+04 | 1.36 | |
| Vimentin | 4.93E+04 | 1.25 | |
| Desmin | 4.23E+04 | 1.07 | |
| Myosin light polypeptide 6 | 1.30E+05 | 1.04 | |
| Transgelin | 8.74E+04 | 0.93 | |
| Galectin-1 | 1.20E+05 | 0.85 | |
| Calponin-1 | 5.05E+04 | 0.80 |
Proteomic studies on the mouse WAT proteome.
| No. | Year | Protein identification | Fraction methods | MS | FDR | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 61 | 2D-PAGE | MALDI-TOF-MS | ||
| 2 | 2001 | 108 | 2D-SDS-PAGE | MALDI-TOF-MS, Q-TOF | ||
| 3 | 2007 | 3,287 | SDS-PAGE followed by LC | LTQ-FTICR | ||
| 4 | 2009 | 2,434 | SDS-PAGE followed by HPLC | LTQ-Orbitrap | Protein level FDR < 1% | |
| 5 | 2010 | 1,493 | SDS-PAGE followed by HPLC | LTQ-FTICR | Protein probability score ≥ 99% | |
| 6 | 2018 | 2,308 | Low-fraction SDS-PAGE gel followed by LC | Q-Exactive | Protein level FDR = 1% | |
| 7 | 2018 | 6,036 | RPLC | Triple TOF | Protein level FDR = 1% | This study |
Figure 2Comparison analysis of the present mouse adipose tissue proteome and protein distribution analysis of WAT proteome in this study.
(A) Venn diagram analysis of present mouse WAT proteome studies. (B) Protein distribution based on abundance of WAT proteome in this study.
Figure 3Functional annotation (GO and IPA analysis) of WAT proteome.
(A) Cellular components, (B) molecular function, (C) biological processes, and (D) top canonical pathway.