B Wyrzykowska-Ceradini1, M W Calfee2, A Touati1, J Wood2, R L Mickelsen3, L Miller4, M Colby5, C Slone1, N G Gatchalian6, S G Pongur1, D Aslett1. 1. Jacobs Technology Inc., Tullahoma, TN, USA. 2. Decontamination and Consequence Management Division, National Homeland Security Research Center, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 3. CBRN Consequence Management Advisory Division, Office of Land and Emergency Management, US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 4. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Riverdale, MD, USA. 5. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA, Washington, DC, USA. 6. Arcadis Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: (i) To develop an analytical method for recovery and quantification of bacteriophage MS2-as a surrogate for foot-and-mouth disease virus-from complex porous surfaces, with and without the presence of laboratory-developed agricultural grime; (ii) to evaluate, with a 4-log dynamic range, the virucidal activity of common biocides for their ability to decontaminate surfaces and hence remediate facilities, following a foreign animal disease contamination incident. METHODS AND RESULTS: An analytical method was developed and optimized for MS2 recovery from simulated agricultural surfaces. The addition of Dey-Engley neutralizing broth to an extraction buffer improved MS2 viability in liquid extracts, with optimal analytical holding times determined as <8 to ≤24 h, depending on matrix. The recovery of MS2 from surface materials decreased in the order: nonporous reference material >grimed porous materials >nongrimed porous materials. In disinfectant testing, two spray applications of pAB were effective against MS2 (≥4-log reduction) on all operational-scale materials. Two per cent citric acid had limited effectiveness, with a ≥4-log reduction observed on a selected subset of grimed concrete samples. CONCLUSIONS: Decontamination efficacy test results can be affected by surface characteristics, extraction buffer composition, analytical holding time and surface-specific organism survivability. Efficacy should be evaluated using a test method that reflects the environmental characteristics of the intended application. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of this study demonstrate the importance of analytical method verification tests for disinfectant testing prior to application in complex environments.
AIMS: (i) To develop an analytical method for recovery and quantification of bacteriophage MS2-as a surrogate for foot-and-mouth disease virus-from complex porous surfaces, with and without the presence of laboratory-developed agricultural grime; (ii) to evaluate, with a 4-log dynamic range, the virucidal activity of common biocides for their ability to decontaminate surfaces and hence remediate facilities, following a foreign animal disease contamination incident. METHODS AND RESULTS: An analytical method was developed and optimized for MS2 recovery from simulated agricultural surfaces. The addition of Dey-Engley neutralizing broth to an extraction buffer improved MS2 viability in liquid extracts, with optimal analytical holding times determined as <8 to ≤24 h, depending on matrix. The recovery of MS2 from surface materials decreased in the order: nonporous reference material >grimed porous materials >nongrimed porous materials. In disinfectant testing, two spray applications of pAB were effective against MS2 (≥4-log reduction) on all operational-scale materials. Two per cent citric acid had limited effectiveness, with a ≥4-log reduction observed on a selected subset of grimed concrete samples. CONCLUSIONS: Decontamination efficacy test results can be affected by surface characteristics, extraction buffer composition, analytical holding time and surface-specific organism survivability. Efficacy should be evaluated using a test method that reflects the environmental characteristics of the intended application. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of this study demonstrate the importance of analytical method verification tests for disinfectant testing prior to application in complex environments.
Authors: Timothy R Julian; Francisco J Tamayo; James O Leckie; Alexandria B Boehm Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Peter W Krug; Laura J Lee; Angelique C Eslami; Christopher R Larson; Luis Rodriguez Journal: Biologicals Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 1.856
Authors: T Morin; H Martin; C Soumet; R Fresnel; S Lamaudière; A L Le Sauvage; K Deleurme; P Maris Journal: J Appl Microbiol Date: 2015-07-25 Impact factor: 3.772
Authors: Joseph P Wood; William Richter; Michelle Sunderman; M Worth Calfee; Shannon Serre; Leroy Mickelsen Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Rachael L Hardison; Sarah W Nelson; Daniela Barriga; Jessica M Ghere; Gabrielle A Fenton; Ryan R James; Michael J Stewart; Sang Don Lee; M Worth Calfee; Shawn P Ryan; Megan W Howard Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Katelyn E Zulauf; Alex B Green; Alex N Nguyen Ba; Tanush Jagdish; Dvir Reif; Robert Seeley; Alana Dale; James E Kirby Journal: mBio Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Cristina Del Álamo; Ángela Vázquez-Calvo; Antonio Alcamí; Juan Sánchez-García-Casarrubios; José Luis Pérez-Díaz Journal: Food Environ Virol Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 4.034
Authors: Katelyn E Zulauf; Alex B Green; Alex N Nguyen; Tanush Jagdish; Dvir Reif; Robert Seeley; Alana Dale; James E Kirby Journal: medRxiv Date: 2020-04-25