Literature DB >> 31378638

Time trend of exposure to the phthalate plasticizer substitute DINCH in Germany from 1999 to 2017: Biomonitoring data on young adults from the Environmental Specimen Bank (ESB).

Monika Kasper-Sonnenberg1, Holger M Koch2, Petra Apel3, Maria Rüther3, Claudia Pälmke1, Thomas Brüning1, Marike Kolossa-Gehring3.   

Abstract

DINCH (cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid-diisononyl ester) is a phthalate plasticizer substitute introduced into the market in 2002. It is increasingly used especially in the production of toys, food contact materials and medical devices. In this measurement campaign on 24-h urine samples of young adults (20-29 years) from the German Environmental Specimen Bank (ESB) collected in 2010, 2011, 2013, 2015 and 2017 (in total 300 samples, 60 samples/year) we analyzed three specific, oxidized DINCH metabolites (OH-MINCH: cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid-mono(hydroxy-isononyl) ester; cx-MINCH: cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid-mono(carboxy-isooctyl) ester, oxo-MINCH: cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid-mono(oxo-isononyl) ester). We merged these data with earlier data of the ESB from the years 1999-2012 and are now able to report levels and time trends of internal DINCH exposure from 1999 to 2017. After first detections of the major oxidized DINCH metabolite OH-MINCH in 2006 (6.7%) detection rates rapidly increased to 43.3% in 2009, 80% in 2010 and 98.3% in 2011 and 2012. From the year 2013 on we could detect OH-MINCH in every urine sample analyzed. The median concentrations of OH-MINCH rapidly increased from 0.15 μg/L in 2010 to twice the concentration in 2011 (0.31 μg/L) with further increases in 2013 (0.37 μg/L), 2015 (0.59 μg/L) and 2017 (0.70 μg/L). Similar increases, albeit at lower detection rates and concentration levels, could be observed for cx-MINCH and oxo-MINCH. All metabolites strongly correlate with each other. For the ESB study population, DINCH exposures are still far below health based guidance values such as the German Human Biomonitoring Value (HBM-I; 4,500 μg/L for the sum of OH-MINCH and cx-MINCH) or the tolerable daily intake (TDI) of EFSA (1 mg/kg bw/d). The median daily DINCH intake (DI) calculated for 2017 was 0.23 μg/kg bw/d, thus 4,310-times lower than the TDI. The maximum DI calculated for one individual in 2012 (42.60 μg/kg bw/d) was a factor of more than 20 below the TDI. The ongoing increase in DINCH exposure needs to be closely monitored in the future, including populations with potentially higher exposures such as children. This close monitoring will enable timely exposure and risk reduction measures if exposures reached critical levels, or if new toxicological data lead to lower health based guidance values. DINCH belongs to the European Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU) priority substances for which policy relevant questions still have to be answered.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid-diisononyl ester; DINCH; Human biomonitoring; Plasticizer; Time trend; Urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31378638     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  9 in total

1.  Temporal Trends of Exposure to Phthalates and Phthalate Alternatives in California Pregnant Women during 2007-2013: Comparison with Other Populations.

Authors:  Hyeong-Moo Shin; Upasana Dhar; Antonia M Calafat; Vy Nguyen; Rebecca J Schmidt; Irva Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Time-trends in human urinary concentrations of phthalates and substitutes DEHT and DINCH in Asian and North American countries (2009-2019).

Authors:  Elena Domínguez-Romero; Klára Komprdová; Jiří Kalina; Jos Bessems; Spyros Karakitsios; Dimosthenis A Sarigiannis; Martin Scheringer
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Trends and Patterns of Phthalates and Phthalate Alternatives Exposure in Pregnant Women from Mexico City during 2007-2010.

Authors:  Haotian Wu; Allison J Kupsco; Andrea L Deierlein; Allan C Just; Antonia M Calafat; Emily Oken; Joseph M Braun; Adriana Mercado-Garcia; Alejandra Cantoral; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Robert O Wright; Andrea A Baccarelli
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Biomonitoring of emerging DINCH metabolites in pregnant women in charleston, SC: 2011-2014.

Authors:  Abby G Wenzel; Jessica L Reiner; Satomi Kohno; Bethany J Wolf; John W Brock; Lori Cruze; Roger B Newman; John R Kucklick
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 8.943

5.  Proficiency and Interlaboratory Variability in the Determination of Phthalate and DINCH Biomarkers in Human Urine: Results from the HBM4EU Project.

Authors:  Hans G J Mol; Ingrid Elbers; Claudia Pälmke; Daniel Bury; Thomas Göen; Marta Esteban López; Stefanie Nübler; Vincent Vaccher; Jean-Philippe Antignac; Darina Dvořáková; Jana Hajšlová; Amrit Kaur Sakhi; Cathrine Thomsen; Katrin Vorkamp; Argelia Castaño; Holger M Koch
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-01-26

6.  Prenatal Exposures to Common Phthalates and Prevalent Phthalate Alternatives and Infant DNA Methylation at Birth.

Authors:  Rebekah L Petroff; Vasantha Padmanabhan; Dana C Dolinoy; Deborah J Watkins; Joseph Ciarelli; Diana Haggerty; Douglas M Ruden; Jaclyn M Goodrich
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Plasticizers: negative impacts on the thyroid hormone system.

Authors:  Ceyhun Bereketoglu; Ajay Pradhan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.190

8.  Exposure to Contemporary and Emerging Chemicals in Commerce among Pregnant Women in the United States: The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcome (ECHO) Program.

Authors:  Jessie P Buckley; Jordan R Kuiper; Deborah H Bennett; Emily S Barrett; Tracy Bastain; Carrie V Breton; Sridhar Chinthakindi; Anne L Dunlop; Shohreh F Farzan; Julie B Herbstman; Margaret R Karagas; Carmen J Marsit; John D Meeker; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Thomas G O'Connor; Megan E Romano; Susan Schantz; Rebecca J Schmidt; Deborah J Watkins; Hongkai Zhu; Edo D Pellizzari; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 11.357

9.  Concurrent Assessment of Phthalates/HEXAMOLL® DINCH Exposure and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Performance in Three European Cohorts of the HBM4EU Aligned Studies.

Authors:  Valentina Rosolen; Elisa Giordani; Marika Mariuz; Maria Parpinel; Luca Ronfani; Liza Vecchi Brumatti; Maura Bin; Gemma Calamandrei; Vicente Mustieles; Liese Gilles; Eva Govarts; Kirsten Baken; Laura Rodriguez Martin; Greet Schoeters; Ovnair Sepai; Eva Sovcikova; Lucia Fabelova; Miroslava Šidlovská; Branislav Kolena; Tina Kold Jensen; Hanne Frederiksen; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Rosa Lange; Petra Apel; Argelia Castano; Marta Esteban López; Griet Jacobs; Stefan Voorspoels; Helena Jurdáková; Renáta Górová; Fabio Barbone
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-09-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.