Literature DB >> 31377928

Mapping the research of energy subsidies: a bibliometric analysis.

Zhen Wang1,2, Yanwen Wang2, Sha Peng3, Beibei Niu4, Can Cui2, Junyi Wu5.   

Abstract

A review of energy subsidy research from a bibliometric perspective was conducted. Based on the bibliometric method, a statistical analysis of energy subsidy-related publications from 1997 to 2016 was undertaken using the Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) databases. A total of 1182 publications were retrieved, with a significant increase in the number of publications observed after 2006. The majority of these publications were within the disciplines of Energy & Fuels and Environmental Science & Ecology. Although the USA and China contributed the most papers, authors from 96 countries were involved in the various studies. The USA was the center of global collaborations, while other countries/territories mainly conducted bilateral or regional collaborations in their research activities. Five of the top 11 most productive institutes were from China, followed by the USA. The frequency of collaborations among institutes was relatively low. However, the institute-keyword 2-mode network showed that institutes had great potential to cooperate on a number of common topics. Five major themes were identified from the co-keywords analysis: general renewable energy research, bio-energies, sustainability, subsidies, and welfare. The findings, as a complement to previous conventional reviews, will be useful in future energy subsidy research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-mode network; Bibliometrics; Energy subsidies; Network analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31377928     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06025-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  6 in total

1.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

Authors:  Eugene Garfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Energy and material flows of megacities.

Authors:  Christopher A Kennedy; Iain Stewart; Angelo Facchini; Igor Cersosimo; Renata Mele; Bin Chen; Mariko Uda; Arun Kansal; Anthony Chiu; Kwi-Gon Kim; Carolina Dubeux; Emilio Lebre La Rovere; Bruno Cunha; Stephanie Pincetl; James Keirstead; Sabine Barles; Semerdanta Pusaka; Juniati Gunawan; Michael Adegbile; Mehrdad Nazariha; Shamsul Hoque; Peter J Marcotullio; Florencia González Otharán; Tarek Genena; Nadine Ibrahim; Rizwan Farooqui; Gemma Cervantes; Ahmet Duran Sahin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Impact, not impact factor.

Authors:  Inder M Verma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Renewable resources: Build a biomass energy market.

Authors:  Heinz Kopetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies.

Authors:  Edgar G Hertwich; Thomas Gibon; Evert A Bouman; Anders Arvesen; Sangwon Suh; Garvin A Heath; Joseph D Bergesen; Andrea Ramirez; Mabel I Vega; Lei Shi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels.

Authors:  Jason Hill; Erik Nelson; David Tilman; Stephen Polasky; Douglas Tiffany
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.