Tamara Y Milder1,2,3,4, Sophie L Stocker2,3, Dorit Samocha-Bonet3,4, Richard O Day2,3, Jerry R Greenfield5,6,7. 1. Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 3. St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 4. Diabetes and Metabolism, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 5. Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. j.greenfield@garvan.org.au. 6. St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. j.greenfield@garvan.org.au. 7. Diabetes and Metabolism, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia. j.greenfield@garvan.org.au.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have important cardiovascular and renal benefits in adults with type 2 diabetes who have or are at high risk of cardiovascular and renal disease. These benefits are seen in patients with impaired renal function where the glucose-lowering effects are not observed. Here, we review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacology of SGLT2 inhibitors in relation to cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE for original research, meta-analyses and review articles relevant to the pharmacokinetics, and cardiac and renal outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors published up until June 2019. Specialist society guidelines and publications were also consulted. RESULTS: Renal impairment is currently a contraindication to SGLT2 inhibitor use largely due to limited anti-hyperglycaemic efficacy. However, in cardiovascular outcome trials, and a dedicated renal outcome trial, cardiovascular and renal benefits were seen in participants with CKD suggesting that mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular and renal benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors are likely largely independent of the glucose-lowering action of these agents. CONCLUSIONS: Despite minimal glycaemic benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes and stage 3 CKD, the cardiovascular and renal benefits of these agents are preserved in this group of patients. Whether these agents have cardiovascular and renal benefits in patients with stage 4 CKD and patients with non-diabetic CKD needs further research.
PURPOSE:Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have important cardiovascular and renal benefits in adults with type 2 diabetes who have or are at high risk of cardiovascular and renal disease. These benefits are seen in patients with impaired renal function where the glucose-lowering effects are not observed. Here, we review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacology of SGLT2 inhibitors in relation to cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE for original research, meta-analyses and review articles relevant to the pharmacokinetics, and cardiac and renal outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors published up until June 2019. Specialist society guidelines and publications were also consulted. RESULTS:Renal impairment is currently a contraindication to SGLT2 inhibitor use largely due to limited anti-hyperglycaemic efficacy. However, in cardiovascular outcome trials, and a dedicated renal outcome trial, cardiovascular and renal benefits were seen in participants with CKD suggesting that mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular and renal benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors are likely largely independent of the glucose-lowering action of these agents. CONCLUSIONS: Despite minimal glycaemic benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes and stage 3 CKD, the cardiovascular and renal benefits of these agents are preserved in this group of patients. Whether these agents have cardiovascular and renal benefits in patients with stage 4 CKD and patients with non-diabetic CKD needs further research.
Authors: Thomas A Zelniker; Stephen D Wiviott; Itamar Raz; Kyungah Im; Erica L Goodrich; Marc P Bonaca; Ofri Mosenzon; Eri T Kato; Avivit Cahn; Remo H M Furtado; Deepak L Bhatt; Lawrence A Leiter; Darren K McGuire; John P H Wilding; Marc S Sabatine Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Stephen D Wiviott; Itamar Raz; Marc P Bonaca; Ofri Mosenzon; Eri T Kato; Avivit Cahn; Michael G Silverman; Thomas A Zelniker; Julia F Kuder; Sabina A Murphy; Deepak L Bhatt; Lawrence A Leiter; Darren K McGuire; John P H Wilding; Christian T Ruff; Ingrid A M Gause-Nilsson; Martin Fredriksson; Peter A Johansson; Anna-Maria Langkilde; Marc S Sabatine Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bernard Zinman; Christoph Wanner; John M Lachin; David Fitchett; Erich Bluhmki; Stefan Hantel; Michaela Mattheus; Theresa Devins; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce Neal; Vlado Perkovic; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Dick de Zeeuw; Greg Fulcher; Ngozi Erondu; Wayne Shaw; Gordon Law; Mehul Desai; David R Matthews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Vlado Perkovic; Meg J Jardine; Bruce Neal; Severine Bompoint; Hiddo J L Heerspink; David M Charytan; Robert Edwards; Rajiv Agarwal; George Bakris; Scott Bull; Christopher P Cannon; George Capuano; Pei-Ling Chu; Dick de Zeeuw; Tom Greene; Adeera Levin; Carol Pollock; David C Wheeler; Yshai Yavin; Hong Zhang; Bernard Zinman; Gary Meininger; Barry M Brenner; Kenneth W Mahaffey Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-04-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christoph Wanner; Silvio E Inzucchi; John M Lachin; David Fitchett; Maximilian von Eynatten; Michaela Mattheus; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Bernard Zinman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maryam Afkarian; Michael C Sachs; Bryan Kestenbaum; Irl B Hirsch; Katherine R Tuttle; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Ian H de Boer Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 10.121