Literature DB >> 31377826

Knee joint laxity is restored in a bi-cruciate retaining TKA-design.

N Arnout1,2, J Victor3,4, H Vermue3,4, L Pringels3,4, J Bellemans5, M A Verstraete4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal is to evaluate the passive stability of a bicruciate retaining, cruciate retaining and bicruciate substituting TKA design in relation to the native knee stability in terms of the laxity envelope. A bicruciate retaining knee prosthesis was hypothesized to offer a closer to normal knee stability in vitro.
METHODS: Fourteen cadaveric knee specimens have been tested under passive conditions with and without external loads, involving a varus/valgus and an external/internal rotational torque, distraction/compression force and an anteroposterior shear force. Subsequently, the native knee, bicruciate retaining, cruciate retaining and finally a bicruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty were tested.
RESULTS: Through the range of motion, the width of the varus/valgus and internal/external laxity envelope for the native knee and the bicruciate retaining knee were almost equivalent, whereas the cruciate retaining and the bicruciate substituting knee displayed less laxity and more joint distraction. In all prosthetic knees, an equal anteroposterior laxity was seen for the lateral and medial side whereas in the native knee, a difference in laxity was seen between the stable medial side and the more mobile lateral side.
CONCLUSION: Bicruciate retaining knee prostheses can restore normal laxity and thus have the potential to offer more normal knee function. Restoration of natural peri-articular soft-tissue tension is clinically important because of its obvious effects on joint stability and range of motion. Furthermore, the results of this study could help to establish the ideal ligament tension and laxity in more conventional implants by approaching the normal values for passive knee evaluation as presented here.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cruciate ligaments; Knee laxity; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31377826     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05639-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  5 in total

Review 1.  Does contemporary bicruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty restore the native knee kinematics? A descriptive literature review.

Authors:  Chaochao Zhou; Yun Peng; Shuai An; Hany Bedair; Guoan Li
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Muscle loaded stability reflects ligament-based stability in TKA: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Nele Arnout; Jan Victor; Amelie Chevalier; Johan Bellemans; Matthias A Verstraete
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  A short-term radiological and clinical comparison between the bi-cruciate and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty A retrospective case controlled study.

Authors:  S Kalaai; Y F L Bemelmans; M Scholtes; B Boonen; E H van Haaren; M G M Schotanus
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-26

4.  CORR Insights®: Are There Differences in Micromotion on Radiostereometric Analysis Between Bicruciate- and Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rémy S Nizard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Anatomical bi-cruciate retaining TKA improves gait ability earlier than bi-cruciate stabilized TKA based on triaxial accelerometery data: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kazuki Amemiya; Takao Kaneko; Masaru Omata; Tadashi Igarashi; Kazutaka Takada; Hiroyasu Ikegami; Yoshiro Musha
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2021-05-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.