Literature DB >> 31377734

Heparin and citrate additive carryover during blood collection.

Martin H Keppel1, Simon Auer1, Giuseppe Lippi2, Alexander von Meyer3, Michael Cornes4, Thomas K Felder1, Hannes Oberkofler1, Cornelia Mrazek1, Elisabeth Haschke-Becher1, Janne Cadamuro5.   

Abstract

Background Published evidence on the risk of additive carryover during phlebotomy remains elusive. We aimed to assess potential carryover of citrated and heparinized blood and the relative volume needed to bias clinical chemistry and coagulation tests. Methods We simulated standardized phlebotomies to quantify the risk of carryover of citrate and heparin additives in distilled water, using sodium and lithium as surrogates. We also investigated the effects of contamination of heparinized blood samples with increasing volumes of citrated blood and pure citrate on measurements of sodium, potassium, chloride, magnesium, total and ionized calcium and phosphate. Likewise, we studied the effects of contamination of citrated blood samples with increasing volumes of heparinized blood on heparin (anti-Xa) activity, lithium, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT) and thrombin time (TT). We interpreted these results based on measurement deviations beyond analytical, biological and clinical significance. Results Standardized phlebotomy simulations revealed no significant differences in concentration of surrogate markers. Clinically significant alterations were observed after contamination of heparinized blood samples with volumes of citrated blood beyond 5-50 μL for ionized calcium and beyond 100-1000 μL for sodium, chloride and total calcium. Investigations of pure citrate carryover revealed similar results at somewhat lower volumes. Heparinized blood carryover showed clinically significant interference of coagulation testing at volumes beyond 5-100 μL. Conclusions Our results suggest that during a standardized phlebotomy, heparin or citrate contamination is highly unlikely. However, smaller volumes are sufficient to severely alter test results when deviating from phlebotomy guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood sampling; order of draw; preanalytical phase; sample handling; specimen handling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31377734     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  2 in total

Review 1.  Errors within the total laboratory testing process, from test selection to medical decision-making - A review of causes, consequences, surveillance and solutions.

Authors:  Cornelia Mrazek; Giuseppe Lippi; Martin H Keppel; Thomas K Felder; Hannes Oberkofler; Elisabeth Haschke-Becher; Janne Cadamuro
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 2.  The Order of Draw during Blood Collection: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Giacomo Bazzano; Alessandro Galazzi; Gian Domenico Giusti; Mauro Panigada; Dario Laquintana
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.