Literature DB >> 31377412

β-Lactam vs Non-β-Lactam Antibiotics and Surgical Site Infection in Colectomy Patients.

Jonathan P Kuriakose1, Joceline Vu2, Monita Karmakar3, Jerod Nagel4, Shitanshu Uppal5, Samantha Hendren3, Michael J Englesbe2, Raj Ravikumar6, Darrell A Campbell2, Greta L Krapohl7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a significant preventable source of morbidity, mortality, and cost. Prophylactic antibiotics have been shown to decrease SSI rates, and β-lactam antibiotics are recommended by national guidelines. It is currently unclear whether recommended β-lactam and recommended non-β-lactam antibiotic regimens are equivalent with respect to SSI risk reduction in colectomy patients. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of SSI rates between prophylactic intravenously administered recommended β-lactam and non-β-lactam in colectomy patients (25 CPT codes) collected by the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative from January 2013 to February 2018. Surgical site infection rates were compared as a dichotomous variable (no SSI vs SSI). Mixed-effects regression was used to compare the association between receiving a β-lactam or non-β-lactam antibiotic and likelihood of having an SSI.
RESULTS: Of 9,949 patients, 9,411 (94.6%) received β-lactam antibiotics and 538 (5.4%) received non-β-lactam antibiotics. Overall, there were 622 (6.3%) patients with SSIs. Of the patients receiving β-lactam antibiotics, SSIs developed in 571 (6.1%) compared with 51 (9.5%) patients in the non-β-lactam group. After applying mixed-effects logistic regression, prophylactic treatment with a non-β-lactam regimen was associated with significantly higher odds of surgical site infection (odds ratio 1.65; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.26; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Colectomy patients receiving β-lactam antibiotics had a lower likelihood of SSI compared with those receiving non-β-lactam antibiotics, even when antibiotics were compliant with national recommendations. Our findings suggest that surgeons should prescribe β-lactam antibiotics for prophylaxis whenever possible, reserving alternatives for those rare patients with true allergies or clinical indications for non-β-lactam antibiotic prophylaxis.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31377412     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  2 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Prophylactic Use of Ertapenem for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections after Elective Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Costanza Vicentini; Maria Michela Gianino; Alessio Corradi; Noemi Marengo; Valerio Bordino; Silvia Corcione; Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa; Giovanni Fattore; Carla Maria Zotti
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 2.  Intravenous cephalosporin versus non-cephalosporin-based prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infections in colorectal surgery patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexis N Bowder; Christina F Yen; Lisa M Bebell; Alisha R Fernandes
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.