Lauro Cortigiani1, Quirino Ciampi2, Alberto Lombardo3, Fausto Rigo4, Francesco Bovenzi5, Eugenio Picano6. 1. Cardiology Division, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy. Electronic address: lacortig@tin.it. 2. Cardiology Division, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Benevento, Italy. 3. Cardiology Division, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy. 4. Cardiology Division, Umberto Iº Hospital, Mestre-Venice, Italy. 5. Cardiology Division, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy. 6. Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) of the left anterior descending artery is useful for risk stratification during stress echocardiography (SE) as an add-on to regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA). We sought to provide sex- and age-specific prognostic cutoff values for CFVR. METHODS: A total of 5,577 patients (2,284 women; 110 age ≥ 85 years) who underwent dipyridamole SE with evaluation of RWMA and CFVR were enrolled in a multicenter prospective SE registry. Death and myocardial infarction were the clinical end points. RESULTS: During 20 months' median follow-up, 649 events (236 deaths, 413 infarctions) occurred: 288 in women and 38 in patients ≥85 years. At receiver operating characteristics analysis, the best prognostic cutoff value for CFVR was similar for men (2.03) and women (2.02) and consistent across all age strata (<45 years: 2.03; 45-54 years: 2.04; 45-64 years: 2.03; 65-74 and 75-84 years: 2.0) except for patients >85 years, who showed 1.90 as the optimal value. Independent predictors of mortality or myocardial infarction were RWMA (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.42), reduced CFVR (HR = 3.26), resting ejection fraction (HR = 0.98), smoking habit (HR = 1.41), age (HR = 1.02), and prior percutaneous coronary intervention (HR = 1.20) in patients age <85 years; and RWMA (HR = 5.42), smoking habit (HR = 3.24), and resting ejection fraction (HR = 0.97) in those age ≥85 years. CFVR added a prognostic contribution over clinical parameters, resting ejection fraction, and stress-induced RWMA in all age and sex groups except men >85 years. CONCLUSIONS: A sex-independent value of CFVR ≤2.0 provides the optimal prognostication across all age groups, except for those ≥85 years in whom a cutoff ≤1.90 is needed. Risk stratification is more effective for all age groups when CFVR is combined with RWMA.
PURPOSE: Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) of the left anterior descending artery is useful for risk stratification during stress echocardiography (SE) as an add-on to regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA). We sought to provide sex- and age-specific prognostic cutoff values for CFVR. METHODS: A total of 5,577 patients (2,284 women; 110 age ≥ 85 years) who underwent dipyridamole SE with evaluation of RWMA and CFVR were enrolled in a multicenter prospective SE registry. Death and myocardial infarction were the clinical end points. RESULTS: During 20 months' median follow-up, 649 events (236 deaths, 413 infarctions) occurred: 288 in women and 38 in patients ≥85 years. At receiver operating characteristics analysis, the best prognostic cutoff value for CFVR was similar for men (2.03) and women (2.02) and consistent across all age strata (<45 years: 2.03; 45-54 years: 2.04; 45-64 years: 2.03; 65-74 and 75-84 years: 2.0) except for patients >85 years, who showed 1.90 as the optimal value. Independent predictors of mortality or myocardial infarction were RWMA (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.42), reduced CFVR (HR = 3.26), resting ejection fraction (HR = 0.98), smoking habit (HR = 1.41), age (HR = 1.02), and prior percutaneous coronary intervention (HR = 1.20) in patients age <85 years; and RWMA (HR = 5.42), smoking habit (HR = 3.24), and resting ejection fraction (HR = 0.97) in those age ≥85 years. CFVR added a prognostic contribution over clinical parameters, resting ejection fraction, and stress-induced RWMA in all age and sex groups except men >85 years. CONCLUSIONS: A sex-independent value of CFVR ≤2.0 provides the optimal prognostication across all age groups, except for those ≥85 years in whom a cutoff ≤1.90 is needed. Risk stratification is more effective for all age groups when CFVR is combined with RWMA.
Authors: Mihir A Kelshiker; Henry Seligman; James P Howard; Haseeb Rahman; Michael Foley; Alexandra N Nowbar; Christopher A Rajkumar; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Sayan Sen; Rasha Al-Lamee; Ricardo Petraco Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 35.855