Literature DB >> 31376949

Comparison of accuracy of prediction of postoperative mortality and morbidity between a new, parsimonious risk calculator (SURPAS) and the ACS Surgical Risk Calculator.

Sina Khaneki1, Michael R Bronsert2, William G Henderson3, Maryam Yazdanfar1, Anne Lambert-Kerzner4, Karl E Hammermeister5, Robert A Meguid6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The novel Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS) requires entry of five predictor variables (the other three variables of the eight-variable model are automatically obtained from the electronic health record or a table look-up), provides patient risk estimates compared to national averages, is integrated into the electronic health record, and provides a graphical handout of risks for patients. The accuracy of the SURPAS tool was compared to that of the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-SRC).
METHODS: Predicted risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity was calculated using both SURPAS and ACS-SRC for 1,006 randomly selected 2007-2016 ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) patients with known outcomes. C-indexes, Hosmer-Lemeshow graphs, and Brier scores were compared between SURPAS and ACS-SRC.
RESULTS: ACS-SRC risk estimates for overall morbidity underestimated risk compared to observed postoperative overall morbidity, particularly for the highest risk patients. SURPAS accurately estimates morbidity risk compared to observed morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: SURPAS risk predictions were more accurate than ACS-SRC's for overall morbidity, particularly for high risk patients.
SUMMARY: The accuracy of the SURPAS tool was compared to that of the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-SRC). SURPAS risk predictions were more accurate than those of the ACS-SRC for overall morbidity, particularly for high risk patients.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Comparative effectiveness; Postoperative outcomes; Risk assessment; SURPAS; Surgical risk prediction

Year:  2019        PMID: 31376949     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Performance Comparison Between SURPAS and ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Pulmonary Resection.

Authors:  Neel P Chudgar; Shi Yan; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Katherine D Gray; Daniela Molena; Tamar Nobel; Prasad S Adusumilli; Manjit Bains; Robert J Downey; James Huang; Bernard J Park; Gaetano Rocco; Valerie W Rusch; Smita Sihag; David R Jones; James M Isbell
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Refining the predictive variables in the "Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System" (SURPAS): a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  William G Henderson; Michael R Bronsert; Karl E Hammermeister; Anne Lambert-Kerzner; Robert A Meguid
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2019-08-20

Review 3.  Preoperative predictors of postoperative complications after gastric cancer resection.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  The Hidden Pandemic: the Cost of Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  Guy L Ludbrook
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2021-11-01

5.  Attitudes about use of preoperative risk assessment tools: a survey of surgeons and surgical residents in an academic health system.

Authors:  Nisha Pradhan; Adam R Dyas; Michael R Bronsert; Anne Lambert-Kerzner; William G Henderson; Howe Qiu; Kathryn L Colborn; Nicholas J Mason; Robert A Meguid
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2022-03-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.