Literature DB >> 31376519

No language unification without neural feedback: How awareness affects sentence processing.

Valeria Mongelli1, Erik L Meijs2, Simon van Gaal3, Peter Hagoort4.   

Abstract

How does the human brain combine a finite number of words to form an infinite variety of sentences? According to the Memory, Unification and Control (MUC) model, sentence processing requires long-range feedback from the left inferior frontal cortex (LIFC) to left posterior temporal cortex (LPTC). Single word processing however may only require feedforward propagation of semantic information from sensory regions to LPTC. Here we tested the claim that long-range feedback is required for sentence processing by reducing visual awareness of words using a masking technique. Masking disrupts feedback processing while leaving feedforward processing relatively intact. Previous studies have shown that masked single words still elicit an N400 ERP effect, a neural signature of semantic incongruency. However, whether multiple words can be combined to form a sentence under reduced levels of awareness is controversial. To investigate this issue, we performed two experiments in which we measured electroencephalography (EEG) while 40 subjects performed a masked priming task. Words were presented either successively or simultaneously, thereby forming a short sentence that could be congruent or incongruent with a target picture. This sentence condition was compared with a typical single word condition. In the masked condition we only found an N400 effect for single words, whereas in the unmasked condition we observed an N400 effect for both unmasked sentences and single words. Our findings suggest that long-range feedback processing is required for sentence processing, but not for single word processing.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feedback; N400; Sentence processing; Single word processing; Visual masking

Year:  2019        PMID: 31376519     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  2 in total

1.  Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension.

Authors:  Ryan J Hubbard; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.610

2.  EEG theta and N400 responses to congruent versus incongruent brand logos.

Authors:  Hossein Dini; Aline Simonetti; Enrique Bigne; Luis Emilio Bruni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.