Zobair M Younossi1, Maria Stepanova2, Andrei Racila2, Arian Afendy2, Eric J Lawitz3, Christian Schwabe4, Peter J Ruane5, Jay Lalezari6, K Rajender Reddy7, Ira M Jacobson8, Andrew J Muir9, Anuj Gaggar10, Robert P Myers10, Issah Younossi2, Fatema Nader2. 1. Center for Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia; Betty and Guy Beatty Center for Integrated Research, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia. Electronic address: Zobair.Younossi@inova.org. 2. Center for Outcomes Research in Liver Disease, Washington, District of Columbia. 3. Texas Liver Institute, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, Texas. 4. Auckland Clinical Studies, Auckland, New Zealand. 5. Ruane Medical and Liver Health Institute, Los Angeles, California. 6. Quest Clinical Research, San Francisco, California. 7. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 8. Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York. 9. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 10. Clinical Research at Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections who achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR) to treatment have improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We compared post-treatment PRO scores between patients with chronic HCV infection who did and did not achieve an SVR to treatment. METHODS: Patients who completed treatment in clinical trials were enrolled in 2 registries, depending on the treatment outcome (NCT01457755, NCT01457768), from 2016 to 2017 in 17 countries in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. PRO scores (scale, 0-100) were collected at pretreatment (baseline); the last day of treatment; the post-treatment week 12 follow-up visit (in patients with SVR only); the registry baseline; and on registry weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, and 96 (the non-SVR registry) or every 24 weeks until week 96 (SVR registry), using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) instrument. RESULTS: Our analysis included 4234 patients with an SVR and 242 without an SVR from whom pretreatment PRO data were available (mean age, 54 ± 10 y; 63% male; 65% enrolled in the United States; 17% with cirrhosis; 12% with human immunodeficiency virus co-infection). Upon registry enrollment, patients with an SVR had significant increases in all PRO scores compared with pretreatment baseline levels (all P < .05). Patients without an SVR had mean reductions of 9.2 points or less in PRO scores while followed up on the registry (P < .05 for 4-8 of 8 PRO domains measured by the SF-36). In contrast, patients with an SVR had sustained increases in PRO scores (mean increase, ≤7.0 points) while on the registry. In multivariate analysis, achieving an SVR was associated independently with superior scores in all SF-36 domains at all registry time points (β, +4.8 to +15.9 points, all P ≤ .01). CONCLUSIONS: In a follow-up analysis of participants in clinical trials, we found that those with an SVR to treatment for HCV infection had significant increases in well-being, based on PRO scores. Patients without an SVR had decreasing PRO scores over the follow-up period.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections who achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR) to treatment have improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We compared post-treatment PRO scores between patients with chronic HCV infection who did and did not achieve an SVR to treatment. METHODS: Patients who completed treatment in clinical trials were enrolled in 2 registries, depending on the treatment outcome (NCT01457755, NCT01457768), from 2016 to 2017 in 17 countries in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. PRO scores (scale, 0-100) were collected at pretreatment (baseline); the last day of treatment; the post-treatment week 12 follow-up visit (in patients with SVR only); the registry baseline; and on registry weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, and 96 (the non-SVR registry) or every 24 weeks until week 96 (SVR registry), using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) instrument. RESULTS: Our analysis included 4234 patients with an SVR and 242 without an SVR from whom pretreatment PRO data were available (mean age, 54 ± 10 y; 63% male; 65% enrolled in the United States; 17% with cirrhosis; 12% with human immunodeficiency virus co-infection). Upon registry enrollment, patients with an SVR had significant increases in all PRO scores compared with pretreatment baseline levels (all P < .05). Patients without an SVR had mean reductions of 9.2 points or less in PRO scores while followed up on the registry (P < .05 for 4-8 of 8 PRO domains measured by the SF-36). In contrast, patients with an SVR had sustained increases in PRO scores (mean increase, ≤7.0 points) while on the registry. In multivariate analysis, achieving an SVR was associated independently with superior scores in all SF-36 domains at all registry time points (β, +4.8 to +15.9 points, all P ≤ .01). CONCLUSIONS: In a follow-up analysis of participants in clinical trials, we found that those with an SVR to treatment for HCV infection had significant increases in well-being, based on PRO scores. Patients without an SVR had decreasing PRO scores over the follow-up period.
Authors: Marina Serper; Donna M Evon; Jipcy Amador; Paul W Stewart; Souvik Sarkar; Anna S Lok; Richard K Sterling; Bryce B Reeve; Carol E Golin; K Rajender Reddy; Joseph K Lim; Nancy Reau; David R Nelson; Adrian M Di Bisceglie; Michael W Fried Journal: Liver Int Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Autumn D Zuckerman; Andrew Douglas; Kristen Whelchel; Leena Choi; Joshua DeClercq; Cody A Chastain Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 3.240