Literature DB >> 31376438

Attentional bias to food varies as a function of metabolic state independent of weight status.

Nikoleta S Stamataki1, Rebecca Elliott2, Shane McKie3, John T McLaughlin4.   

Abstract

Eating behaviour requires that internal metabolic changes are recognized by the central nervous system which regulates brain responses to food cues. This function may be altered in obesity. The aim of this study was to examine potential differences in neurocognitive responses to visual food cues as a function of metabolic state and weight status. A crossover study with two participant groups was conducted, one group with normal-weight (n = 20) and one group with overweight/obesity (n = 22), who completed a novel battery of neurocognitive tests assessing food-cue elicited behavior in both fasted and fed states. The test battery included a visual-dot probe task (VPT), a stimulus-response compatibility task (SRCT) and an implicit association task (IAT). Results from the VPT showed a significant main effect of metabolic state on attentional bias (F(1,40) = 9.90, p = .003, η2p = .198), with participants in the fasted state showing a significantly greater attentional bias for food stimuli than in the fed state. No significant main effect of metabolic state on approach food bias, assessed via the SRCT, or implicit attitudes to food cues, assessed via the IAT, was found and overall, no difference in neurocognitive processing of food cues was demonstrated between participant groups. In the fed state, attentional bias to food cues decreases in both normal-weight controls and participants with overweight/obesity, indicating that changes in current metabolic state can be reflected in attentional processing of visual food cues independently of weight status. Neurocognitive tasks which can effectively and sensitively identify differences in food cue perception according to changes in metabolic status will be useful tools in exploring more complicated interactions between homeostatic and hedonic drives of food intake.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Food cues; Food reward; Hunger; Obesity; Satiety

Year:  2019        PMID: 31376438     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  3 in total

1.  Modified Fasting Compared to True Fasting Improves Blood Glucose Levels and Subjective Experiences of Hunger, Food Cravings and Mental Fatigue, But Not Cognitive Function: Results of an Acute Randomised Cross-Over Trial.

Authors:  Ian Zajac; Danielle Herreen; Hugh Hunkin; Genevieve James-Martin; Mathilde Doyen; Naomi Kakoschke; Emily Brindal
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 5.717

2.  Food Captures Attention, but Not the Eyes: An Eye-Tracking Study on Mindset and BMI's Impact on Attentional Capture by High-Caloric Visual Food Stimuli.

Authors:  Leonardo Pimpini; Sarah Kochs; Wieske van Zoest; Anita Jansen; Anne Roefs
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-02-21

3.  Mapping the Homeostatic and Hedonic Brain Responses to Stevia Compared to Caloric Sweeteners and Water: A Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Crossover Trial in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Nikoleta S Stamataki; Shane Mckie; Corey Scott; Douwina Bosscher; Rebecca Elliott; John T McLaughlin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 6.706

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.