Zahra Balavandi1,2, Ali Neshasteh-Riz1,3, Fereshteh Koosha1,4, Samira Eynali1, Mahmood Hoormand5, Minoo Shahidi6. 1. Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Radiation Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Radiation Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Electronic Address: neshastehriz@yahoo.com. 4. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 6. Department of Hematology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Melanoma is the most malignant and severe skin
cancer type. It is a tumor with a risk of high metastasis
and accounts for 75 % of deaths associated with skin
cancer (1). This type of skin cancer is rapidly growing
in recent years, and this can be due to chronic exposure
of skin to sun rays without the use of equipment for
the protection against sunlight, which especially
can lead to melanoma in Caucasians (2). Patients
suffering from melanoma may undergo surgery and/
or receive chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy
or receive a combination of these treatments (3). In
addition, metastasis of the tumor is a significant
problem following surgery (4). Chemotherapy drugs
are often used for the treatment of melanoma include
cisplatin and dacarbazine. Despite the efficacy of these
therapies, several adverse effects have been so far
reported such as tumor resistance to medications and
cytotoxicity such as ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and
leucopenia (5). Radiotherapy can be applied following
surgery and chemotherapy considering the depth of the
lesion and the severity of the disease. The irradiation
could be performed by photon or electron. Usually, the
dose range between 1.8 to 2 (Gy) could be employed
per fraction. Melanoma tumors are among the most
resistant cells to radiation (6). Radiosensitizer drugs
have been developed to reduce the dose of radiation
and the side effects of radiotherapy with the same
outcomes (7).Elemene is a compound extracted from Curcuma
wenyujin which, for the first time, was used against
cancer in China (8). ß-elemene is the active component
of Curcuma wenyujin that is a non-cytotoxic antitumor
drug (9). Recent studies have shown that ß-elemene
may sensitize tumor cells to chemotherapy drugs
such as cisplatin, taxanes, and paclitaxel (10-12). As
reported in previous studies, treatment with ß-elemene
is useful for the treatment of leukemia, HCC,
glioblastoma, breast, bladder, lung, gastric, prostate,
ovarian, and liver cancers (13-16). The beneficial
effect of ß-elemene such as low toxicity, low side
effects, well tolerance by patients, high potency, and
high synergistic effects with other anti-tumor drugs
have made ß-elemene a bona fide candidate for the
treatment of various type of cancers. ß-elemene also
increases the immunogenicity of cancer cells, makes
tumor tissues sensitive to irradiation, reduces the
proliferation of cancer cells, and induces the process
of apoptosis in resistant tumors.In vitro and in vivo studies showed that ß-elemene
makes cancer cells prone to radiation by inactivation
of the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signaling
pathway which decreases the repair rate of damaged
DNA. The formation of double strand break (DSB)
activates ATM kinase following radiation. ß-elemene
acts as an ATM inhibitor via the inhibition of
phosphorylation of ATM after radiotherapy; so, it
could cause increased the death rate by this way
(13). Thus, ß-elemene causes radiosensitization via a
reduction in the repair of double strand break (DSB)
or an increase in radiation-induced DNA damage (17).
Furthermore, recent studies have shown that radiation
can increase the mRNA/protein expression of survivin
in tumor cells and also increase HIF-1a activity.
It hasbeen observed that tumors highly expressing survivinor HIF-1a are resistant to radiation. Previous studies
have shown that ß-elemene enhances radiosensitivityof tumors by the inhibition of the survivin and HIF1a
expression (18-21). It has been implicated that ßelemene
induced radiosensitization is capable of the
upregulation of and downregulation of Bcl-2 in cancer
cells. It also activates caspase -7, caspase-9, and
caspase -3, as well as inducing apoptosis in tumor cells
and increasing the efficiency of radiotherapy (17).So, the study aimed to analyze the inhibitory effect ß
elemene alone or in combination with radiotherapy on the
human melanoma cell line (A375) using MTT test and
flow cytometry.
Materials and Methods
The procedure of the study was approved by the Ethics
Committee of the Iran University of Medical Science
(No. IR. IUMS.REC1395.9311581001).
Agents
ß-elemene was purchased from Abcam (Abcam, USA).
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and
penicillin/streptomycin solution were procured from
Atocel (Austria). Trypsin-ethylene diamine tetra-acetic
acid (EDTA) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) inactivated
with heat was purchased from Biowest company (France).
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were
purchased from Merck (Germany) Annexin V/PI kit was
purchased from Ebioscience company (CA).
Cell culture conditions
A375 human melanoma cell line was purchased from
the cellular bank of the Pasteur Institute of Iran (Iran) and
then the cell culture was performed in standard conditions
[37°C, 5% CO2, 1% antibiotic solution (pen-strep), high
glucose DMEM containing 10% FBS].
Cell proliferation assay
ß-elemene cytotoxicity and viability of incubated
cells in different concentrations of the ß-elemene were
evaluated using MTT assay. To perform this assay,
cells were seeded at a density of 5000 cells/well (in
100 µl medium) into 96-well flat-bottomed microtiter
plates at 24, 48, and 72 hours. During the incubation
time, the medium was changed every other day. Then,
the cells were incubated with different concentrations
of ß-elemene (0-220 µg/ml) for 24 -72 hours with eight
replicates for each treatment. Subsequently, cells were
washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) after the
treatment, and the medium was discarded. Afterwards,
10 µl of MTT dye (5 mg/ml in PBS) was added to
each well; then, the plate was incubated for 3-4 hours
at 37 C with 5% CO2. MTT-containing medium was
removed, and formazan crystals dissolved by the
addition of 100 µl DMSO to each well of the plate
and kept in the dark place at 25°C for 15 minutes.
Eventually, the absorbance of dissolved formazan was
read at 570 nm using a microplate reader (DYNEX
MRX, USA). The relative viability of A375 cells was
described as the proportion of viable cells to untreated
cells. The dose-response curves were plotted. The
half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value
for ß-elemene was obtained from the dose-response
curves by drawing log-linear regression and analyzed
by the GraphPad Prism software version 6.01.
Irradiation
To perform radiotherapy, the A375 cell line was irradiated
by using LINAC accelerator (Siemens, Germany), at the
energy level of 6 MV at doses of 2 and 4 Gy. In order
to reach the energy level of 6 MV, the distance between
a radiation source and tissue surface should be 3cm. So,
we placed 3 layers of Plexiglass (1 cm in diameter) under
the plate and 5 layers (1 cm in diameter) above the plate.
The irradiation process was applied in the front side at
a distance of 100 cm from the bottom of the plate, and
the radiation field size was 20×20 square centimeters. The
monitor unit was calculated by the Core Plan Software in
each irradiation process.
The combinatory effect of ß-elemene and radiotherapy
To examine the combinatory effects of ß-elemene and
radiotherapy, A375 cells were cultivated in 96-well plates
and incubated for 24 hours. After discarding the culture
medium, ß-elemene were added at the concentrations
of 40 and 80 µg/ml to each well. Next, the cells were
incubated for 24 hours. The radiation was delivered at
doses of 2 and 4 Gy X-ray at the energy of 6 MV.
Apoptosis analysis by Flow cytometry
The rate of apoptosis was determined by Annexin V/
PI-Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). The cells were
treated with different ß-elemene concentrations (40, 80
µg/ml) for 24 hours and harvested by trypsinization after
the treatment and centrifugation at 300 g for 5 minutes.
After centrifuging, the cells were washed with 1X binding
buffer and PBS. Then, the cells were suspended in 5 µl of
Fluorochrome-conjugated and 1X binding buffer. Next,
100 µl of Annexin V was added into the cell suspension
and incubated in a dark place for 20 minutes. The cells
washed with 2 ml of binding buffer and resuspended in
200 µl of 1X binding buffer. Finally, 5 µl of propidium
iodide (PI) staining solution was added to 200 µl cell
suspension, and the samples were evaluated by flow
cytometry (BD FACSCantoII, USA).
Statistical analysis
All the plotted data are shown as the mean ± SD, and
the tests were at least repeated three times. Analysis of
variance analysis (ANOVA) was conducted to analyze
the data, and the comparison was made among different
groups by the SPSS software version 16. The graphs and
curves were assessed by the GraphPad Prism software
(version 6.01). To indicate the significance of differences,
the P<0.05 was statistically considered significant.
Results
Assessment of cell death and IC50 value of the drug
following drug treatment using MTT assay
Cells were treated with various concentrations (0-220
µg/ml) of ß-elemene and incubated for 24, 48 and 72
hours. Figure 1A shows the percentage of cells viability
after the 24-hour treatment process. Upon increasing the
concentrations of ß-elemene from 10 to 80 µg/ml, the
differences between cell viability do not significantly
change. On the other hand, in a range of 100 to 220 µg/
ml ß-elemene a significant reduction in the viability of
the cells was observed. After a 48-hour incubation period,
as shown in Figure 1B, in cells treated with 10 µg/ml
ß-elemene, a slight reduction in the viability of cells was
observed (non-significant). At a concentration range of
20 to 220 µg/ml, the viability of cells was remarkably
reduced. Figure 1C shows the viability of cells after a
72-hour incubation period. At a concentration range of
40 to 160 µg/ml ß-elemene, thecell viability was reduced
significantly. In cells treated with 180, 200, and 220 µg/
ml ß-elemene, a slight increase in the viability of cells was
observed. Also, no significant difference was observed
at a concentration range of 10 and 20 µg/ml ß-elemene.
All the treatment groups were compared with the control
group (treatment-naive). Furthermore, the IC50 values
for ß-elemene, at three different time points in human
melanoma were calculated based on the results obtained
from the MTT assay results. IC50 values for ß-elemene
were 112.2 µg/ ml, confidence interval (CI): 90.87 133.5,
88.43 µg/ml, CI: 90.87 133.5 and (42.06 µg/ml, CI: 6.460
77.65) at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively.The growth rate of A375 cell line was inhibited by ß-elemene. A375
cells were cultivated in 96-well plates at a density of 5×103 cells/well
and treated with different concentrations of ß-elemene in different time
periods: A. 24, B. 48, and C. 72 hours. Cell proliferation was evaluated
using the MTT assay. The IC50 value is a concentration of a drug that
inhibits cell proliferation by 50% in comparison to the control. The
data are shown as the means ± SD of three independent experiments.
Asterisks indicate significant differences. ****; P<0.0001, ***; P<0.001,
**; P<0.01, *; P<0.05, NS; Non significant, IC50: The half maximal inhibitory
concentration, and CI; Confidence interval.Figure 2 shows the comparison of all the mentioned
groups in three different times (24 hours, 48 hours, 72
hours).The capability of ß-elemene to inhibit cell proliferation was
measured by the MTT assay. The viability of cells was approximately
decreased in dose- and time-dependent manners. The difference in the
IC50 value for ß-elemene was observed among the different incubation
times. A significant reduction was detected in the viability of treated cells
in a 72 hours incubation time compared with 24 and 48 hour periods. The
data are presented as the means ± SD of three independent experiments.
IC50; The half maximal inhibitory concentration.
Cell death evaluation in A-375 cell line, following the
treatment with ß-elemene and radiation using the
MTT assay
To study the effects of ß-elemene on radiotherapy,
pretreating was performed on cells with two concentrations of
ß-elemene, namely 40 and 80 µg/ml for 24 hours. Then, cells
were exposed to radiation at doses of 2 and 4 Gy. Considering
Figure 3, groups treated with a combination of ß-elemene and
radiation, had a significant reduction in the viability compared
with the groups treated with ß-elemene alone. Combination
therapy with ß-elemene and radiotherapy significantly halted
the proliferation of cancer cells compared with when each
therapy was applied alone.Cell proliferation was inhibited by ß-elemene. ß-elemene also
increased the radiosensitivity of A375 cells. Comparison of the viability of
A375 cells after the treatment with 40, 80 µg/ml of ß-elemene. After 24
hours of incubation time, cells were exposed to 2 and 4 (Gy) of 6 MV X-ray;
then, the viability of cells was measured using the MTT assay. All treated
groups were compared with the control group (treatment-naive). The
data are presented as the means ± SD of three independent experiments.
Asterisks indicate significant difference. *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ***;
P<0.001, and NS; Non significant.Annexin V-PI staining for the assessment of apoptosis following
ß-elemene and radiation therapy in A375 human melanoma cell line. The
pretreated process on cancer cells was performed at two concentrations
of ß-elemene (40 and 80 µg/ml) for 24 hours. Then cells were exposed to
2 and 4 Gy irradiations in combination with ß-elemene for 24 hours. A.
Early apoptosis was evaluated by Annexin V+/PI- staining, and Annexin
V+/PI+ staining was applied as a marker for the detection of cells in the
late apoptosis phase and B. PI and Annexin V double staining results
indicated the induction of apoptosis by ß-elemene and enhanced
radiation-induced apoptosis in human melanoma cancer cells. Cells were
exposed to ß-elemene at concentrations of 40 and 80 µg/ml along with 2
and 4 Gy irradiations. All the treatment groups were compared with the
control group (no drug). The data are presented as the means ± SD of three
independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences. ****;
P<0.0001, ***; P<0.001, **; P<0.01, *; P<0.05, and NS; Non significant.
The effect of ß-elemene on apoptosis of A375 cell line
According to the results, ß-elemene induces apoptosis
and enhances the potency of the radiation driving A375
cancer cells to undergo apoptosis. Annexin V/PI staining
was employed to detect the rate of apoptosis to show the
effect of radiosensitization ability of ß-elemene on A-375
cell line. Following the treatment with ß-elemene, apparent
morphological alterations were detected in cancer cells. Early
apoptosis was examined via Annexin V+/PI- staining, while
late apoptosis was monitored via Annexin V+/PI+ staining as
depicted in Figure 4A. The quantification of different modes
of cell death following ß-elemen and radiation exposure
were shown in Figure 4B. The number of apoptotic cells in
the groups treated with either ß-elemene or radiation were
significantly higher than the control group (no therapy, no
radiation). Furthermore, a significantly higher apoptotic
rate was observed in the groups treated with radiation and
ß-elemene at concentrations of 40 and 80 µg/ml (P<0.01,
P<0.001, P<0.0001). The apoptotic rate was increased in
parallel with an increment in the concentrations of ß- elemene.
Discussion
Melanoma is the most malignant and serious type of
skin cancer (22). Patients suffering from melanoma can
undergo various forms of therapy including surgery,
chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, as well as receiving a
combination of these treatment methods. Since melanoma
tumor cells are among the most resistant cells to radiation
(23); therefore, we need to novel treatments to conquer
the resistance of this cancer to radiation. Recently,
researchers attempt to find new anticancer drugs which
among them radio sensitizers showed hold a great
promise for the treatment of melanoma. ß-elemene, is a
natural and traditional Chinese medicinal herb, indicating
antitumor effects on many types of tumors with much
fewer side effects (24). It has been demonstrated that
ß-elemene could inhibit the growth and development of
some chemotherapy-resistant tumors, including ovarian,
prostate, and glioblastoma (14, 25).In this study, combination treatment with ß-elemene
and radiation was examined to enhance radio sensitization
with 6 MV X-ray in A375 cell line. The advantage of
combination therapy is to increase the efficiency of
the treatment when compared with standard treatment
procedures. The MTT assay showed that ß-elemene
could reduce the viability and inhibit the in-vitro growth
of the human melanoma cell line in dose and time
dependent manners. In the following step, after a 24hour
incubation period, a significant reduction in the
viability was observed when ß-elemene was applied
at the concentrations range of 100 µg/ml to 220 µg/ml,
however, after a 48-hour incubation period, treatment
with ß-elemene at concentrations range of 20 µg/ml to 220
µg/ml reduced the viability of cells from 93 to 8%. The
highest reduction rate of the cell viability was achieved
at the concentrations range of 40 µg/ml to 160 µg/ml at
a 72- hour incubation period. The trend of the reduction
in the cell viability not only depends on the concentration
of ß-elemene but also depends on the incubation time.
The IC50 values obtained from the effect of ß-elemene on
A375 cells were approximately 112.2, 88.43, 46.03 µg/ml
at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. These data indicate
that ß-elemene vigorously decreases the viability of
tumor cells. The statistical analysis of the data indicated a
considerable reduction in the cells viability in the groups
co-treated with ß-elemene and radiation compared with
those treated with ß-elemene alone or the control group
(no therapy).The cell viability of the group treated with 40 µg/ml of
ß-elemene was 80%, while in combination treatment at a
dose of 2 Gy with 6 MVX-ray reduced the viability to 61%.
The results of the current study are consistent with previous
studies. For example, Lu et al. (26) investigated the effect
of ß-elemene on bladder tumor cells. They examined the
cytotoxicity of ß-elemene using the MTT method and
observed ß-elemene could inhibit the proliferation of T24
bladder carcinoma cells. Furthermore, Zhan et al. (27)
evaluated the viability of human RCC 786-0 cell line after
the treatment with different concentrations of ß-elemene
for 24, 48 or 72 hours. The MTT assay indicated that
ß-elemene inhibited the proliferation of 786-0 cells in
dose and time depending manners.In this research, we analyzed the effect of ß-elemene on
radiosensitivity of tumor cells to drive them to undergo
apoptosis. The flow cytometry analysis indicates that
ß-elemene is effective to induce apoptosis. ß-elemene
induced apoptosis in A375 cell line was measured by
Annexin V/PI staining. Treatment with either ß-elemene
or radiation could somewhat increase the number of
apoptotic cells in a dose-dependent way, confirming
the results obtained from the MTT assay. Also, the flow
cytometry analysis demonstrated that ß-elemene inhibits
A375 cells proliferation and stimulates cell death by
means of inducing apoptosis. The number of apoptotic
cells by co-treatment with ß-elemene and radiation were
significantly higher than those undergone cell death by
the radiation or ß-elemene individually. For example,
combination treatment with ß-elemene (40 µg/ml) and
radiation at a dose of 4 (Gy) resulted in a decrease in the
cell survival by 57.5% in comparison with the control.
The percentages of apoptotic cells in response to the
treatment of cells with 40 µg/ml ß-elemene or exposure
to 4Gy of X-ray were 25/29% and 19/65%, respectively.Liu et al. (28) investigated the effect of ß-elemene on
stomach tumor cells using the flow cytometry method.
They indicated a higher rate of apoptotic cells when
incubated with ß-elemene in comparison with the
control group. They found that ß-elemene interferes with
the PI3K/Akt/mTOR/p70S6K1 pathways and causes
apoptosis in tumor cells. Furthermore, the results of a
study conducted by Dai et al. (29) showed that one of the
important apoptotic pathways in tumors is the expression
of Fas/FasL. ß-elemene is capable of inducing apoptosis in
HepG2 cancer cells thereby the increase in the expression
of Fas/FasL.Li et al. (30) and Pugazhenthi et al. (31) have shown
that ß-elemene could activate caspase-3 caspase-7, and
caspase-9 and increase the ratio of Bax: Bcl-2, which
is associated with the apoptosis of cancer cells. Also, Li
et al. (32) observed that ß-elemene makes NSCLC cells
sensitive to cisplatin triggering the intrinsic apoptosis
pathway which involves Bcl-2 family proteins and
inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs). So, our data showed
that ß-elemene effectively enhanced radio sensitivity in
A375 cell line. Similar results were obtained when the
cells treated with 80 µg/ml of ß-elemene in combination
with 2 and 4 Gy of X-ray. Liu et al. (33) investigated the
effect of alone and also in combination with radiation on
glioblastoma cells (U87-MG) using colony formation.
In the colony formation assay, in cells treated with both
ß-elemene and radiation, the colony formation ability was
significantly reduced compared with the control group.
As well, radiosensitivity was significantly enhanced
following the treatment of the cells with ß-elemene. Li et
al. (34) examined radiosensitization of ß-elemene in lung
cancer cells (A549) by the comet assay and observed the
same results. In general, ß-elemene increases tumor radio
sensitivity through two mechanisms; i. The induction of
cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and ii. The activation
of ATM kinase by the DSB formation following radiation.
So, the process of radio sensitization is related to the
enhancement in radiation-induced DNA damage or a
decrease in the repair of DSB (35). However, the precise
mechanism of action of this herb is still unknown.
Conclusion
Radiation and ß-elemene are able to reduce the cell
viability and increase apoptosis of melanoma cells.
The cells viability was decreased by 23 and 30% for 2
and 4 Gy, respectively. Also, combination therapy with
ß-elemene and radiation resulted in an increased rate of
apoptosis. The percentages of apoptotic cells treated with
40 µg/ml ß-elemene and 4 Gy of X-ray alone were 25 and
19 %, respectively. The findings of this study indicated
the efficiency of ß-elemene in treating melanoma cells
and showed the necessity of more research in this field.
Authors: K Thomas Robbins; Garry Clayman; Paul A Levine; Jesus Medina; Roy Sessions; Ashok Shaha; Peter Som; Gregory T Wolf Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2002-07
Authors: Paul F Robbins; Richard A Morgan; Steven A Feldman; James C Yang; Richard M Sherry; Mark E Dudley; John R Wunderlich; Azam V Nahvi; Lee J Helman; Crystal L Mackall; Udai S Kammula; Marybeth S Hughes; Nicholas P Restifo; Mark Raffeld; Chyi-Chia Richard Lee; Catherine L Levy; Yong F Li; Mona El-Gamil; Susan L Schwarz; Carolyn Laurencot; Steven A Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S Pugazhenthi; A Nesterova; C Sable; K A Heidenreich; L M Boxer; L E Heasley; J E Reusch Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-04-14 Impact factor: 5.157