| Literature DB >> 31376281 |
Peishan Li1, Long Sheng1, Yongguo Jin1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to establish optimal conditions for microwave-assisted phosphorylation modification of egg white. Response surface methodology was used to model and optimize the degree of phosphorylation, solubility, foaming ability, and foaming stability of egg white powder. The concentration of sodium tripolyphosphate, microwave power, and microwave time were selected as the main processing conditions in the phosphorylation modification of egg white protein. The following 3 conditions for optimal phosphorylation modification of egg white are the concentration of sodium tripolyphosphate of 33.84 g/L, microwave power of 419.38 W, and microwave time 90 s for maximum functional properties (solubility, foaming ability and foaming stability) and the concentration of sodium tripolyphosphate of 32.97 g/L, microwave power of 429.29 W and microwave time of 90 s for maximum foaming properties (foaming ability and foaming stability), respectively. We consequently succeeded in phosphorylation modification with microwave assistance and confirmed the various desirable properties of optimal phosphorylation modification.Entities:
Keywords: albumen; foam; response surface; solubility
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31376281 PMCID: PMC8914005 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Experimental values of response variables for the Box–Behnken design.
| Independent variables | Dependent variable | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coded level | Uncoded level | |||||||||
| Run | −1 | 0 | 1 | A | B | C | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 |
| 1 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 400 | 150 | 1.43 ± 0.11 | 86.19 ± 3.22 | 72.33 ± 2.21 | 42.22 ± 1.39 |
| 2 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 30 | 300 | 150 | 2.52 ± 0.21 | 88.06 ± 2.63 | 107.87 ± 1.36 | 67.50 ± 2.96 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 400 | 120 | 2.41 ± 0.18 | 90.22 ± 3.52 | 126.00 ± 3.36 | 60.00 ± 1.47 |
| 4 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 20 | 400 | 90 | 1.03 ± 0.02 | 79.62 ± 1.98 | 75.00 ± 1.67 | 46.13 ± 0.98 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 40 | 400 | 90 | 2.53 ± 0.15 | 89.21 ± 1.52 | 129.00 ± 2.36 | 63.00 ± 1.12 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 400 | 120 | 2.52 ± 0.09 | 90.58 ± 2.23 | 126.67 ± 3.65 | 62.00 ± 1.63 |
| 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 500 | 150 | 3.00 ± 0.12 | 87.07 ± 2.03 | 92.89 ± 2.52 | 37.33 ± 1.87 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 30 | 500 | 90 | 2.43 ± 0.03 | 87.50 ± 1.22 | 132.67 ± 2.63 | 68.67 ± 0.98 |
| 9 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 30 | 300 | 90 | 3.29 ± 0.08 | 89.52 ± 0.63 | 115.83 ± 2.85 | 64.00 ± 1.74 |
| 10 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 40 | 300 | 120 | 2.89 ± 0.01 | 81.83 ± 0.96 | 95.52 ± 2.07 | 64.76 ± 1.35 |
| 11 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 20 | 300 | 120 | 1.40 ± 0.03 | 90.58 ± 0.36 | 68.13 ± 1.28 | 38.67 ± 1.36 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 40 | 50 | 120 | 2.84 ± 0.02 | 86.52 ± 1.85 | 101.86 ± 1.68 | 35.71 ± 1.17 |
| 13 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 500 | 120 | 1.34 ± 0.05 | 77.68 ± 0.36 | 86.44 ± 1.39 | 42.44 ± 1.87 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 400 | 120 | 2.46 ± 0.09 | 89.04 ± 0.88 | 133.33 ± 2.24 | 60.00 ± 1.29 |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 40 | 400 | 120 | 2.41 ± 0.16 | 80.74 ± 0.36 | 86.67 ± 1.71 | 53.78 ± 1.41 |
Independent variables: X1 and A, the concentration of sodium tripolyphosphate (g/L); X2 and B, microwave power (W); X3 and C, microwave time (min). Dependent variables: Y1, degree of phosphorylation (mg/g); Y2, soubility (g/100 g); Y3, foaming ability (%); Y4, foaming stability(%).
Regression coefficients and R2 for 3 dependent variables.
| Coefficient | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factors | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | ||||
| Intercept | 4.0661 | 0.0003 | 32.6547 | 0.0020 | −703.8039 | 0.0016 | −290.9216 | 0.0010 |
| X1 | 0.5111 | <0.0001 | 2.7610 | 0.2549 | 25.2261 | 0.0012 | 11.4194 | 0.0019 |
| X2 | –0.0383 | 0.2138 | –0.0882 | 0.0190 | 1.2056 | 0.1793 | 0.8182 | 0.0014 |
| X3 | –0.0420 | 0.8091 | 0.6080 | 0.2984 | 3.4779 | 0.0028 | 0.5106 | 0.0037 |
| X1 X2 | 5.9630E-007 | 0.9926 | 4.3946E-003 | 0.0006 | −2.99455E-003 | 0.3642 | −8.2063E-003 | 0.0021 |
| X1 X3 | –4.3161E-004 | 0.0027 | 8.7194E-005 | 0.6712 | –2.65101E-003 | 0.0455 | –2.9028E-003 | 0.0016 |
| X2 X3 | 1.1160E-004 | 0.0027 | 8.7194E-005 | 0.6712 | –2.65101E-003 | 0.0455 | –2.9028E-003 | 0.0016 |
| X12 | –6.5214E-003 | 0.0001 | –0.0494 | 0.0004 | –0.3112 | 0.0002 | –0.1168 | 0.0005 |
| X22 | 3.0407E-005 | 0.0049 | –8.5158E-005 | 0.2179 | –9.55657E-004 | 0.0281 | –3.5891E-004 | 0.0586 |
| X32 | 4.4595E-005 | 0.5542 | –1.1803E-003 | 0.1391 | −7.55125E-003 | 0.0816 | 2.5527E-003 | 0.1791 |
| R2 | 0.9362 | 0.8563 | 0.8674 | 0.8919 | ||||
Y1, degree of phosphorylation (mg/g); Y2, soubility (g/100 g); Y3, foaming ability (%); Y4: foaming stability(%).
Figure 1Response surface for the effect of independent variables on the degree of phosphorylation of egg white protein powder.
Results of optimization the degree of phosphorylation (mg/g), solubility (g/100 g), foaming ability (%), foaming stability (%), functional properties, and foaming properties of phosphorylated egg white protein manufactured by using the optimum phosphorylation conditions.
| Optimum phosphorylation | Measurements | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 (g/L) | X2 (W) | X3 (s) | Y1 (mg/g) | Y2 (g/100 g) | Y3 (%) | Y4 (%) | |
| 1 | 36.22 | 300 | 90 | 3.3218 ± 0.0127 | 89.3129 ± 0.0213 | 115.2184 ± 0.0417 | 68.1112 ± 0.0612 |
| 2 | 22.30 | 300 | 150 | 1.7912 ± 0.0182 | 91.0765 ± 0.0317 | 81.9923 ± 0.0165 | 53.2216 ± 0.0543 |
| 3 | 35.58 | 453 | 90 | 2.6014 ± 0.0478 | 89.7658 ± 0.0344 | 139.2113 ± 0.0712 | 67.8921 ± 0.0533 |
| 4 | 35.51 | 300 | 150 | 2.5711 ± 0.0514 | 83.3367 ± 0.0479 | 100.1237 ± 0.0621 | 73.8765 ± 0.0712 |
| 1 | 32.97 | 429 | 90 | 2.3189 ± 0.0173 | 90.0012 ± 0.0439 | 138.1263 ± 0.045 | 69.7691 ± 0.0451 |
| 2 | 33.84 | 419 | 90 | 2.8135 ± 0.0981 | 88.1879 ± 0.0812 | 137.1100 ± 0.0761 | 69.3127 ± 0.0712 |