Arja Kaipainen1, Ailin Zhang1, Rui M Gil da Costa1, Jared Lucas1, Brett Marck2, Alvin M Matsumoto2, Colm Morrissey3, Lawrence D True4, Elahe A Mostaghel2,5,6, Peter S Nelson1,5,6. 1. Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 2. Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington. 3. Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 4. Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 5. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Testosterone is a driver of prostate cancer (PC) growth via ligand-mediated activation of the androgen receptor (AR). Tumors that have escaped systemic androgen deprivation, castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPC), have measurable intratumoral levels of testosterone, suggesting that a resistance mechanism still depends on androgen-simulated growth. However, AR activation requires an optimal intracellular concentration of androgens, a situation challenged by low circulating testosterone concentrations. Notably, PC cells may optimize their androgen levels by regulating the expression of steroid metabolism enzymes that convert androgen precursors into androgens. Here we propose that testosterone entry into the cell could be another control point. METHODS: To determine whether testosterone enters cells via a transporter, we performed in vitro 3 H-testosterone uptake assays in androgen-dependent LNCaP and androgen and AR-independent PC3 cells. To determine if the uptake mechanism depended on a concentration gradient, we modified UGT2B17 levels in LNCaP cells and measured androgen levels by liquid-liquid extraction-mass spectrometry. We also analyzed CRPC metastases for expression of AKR1C3 to determine whether this enzyme that converts adrenal androgens to testosterone was present in the tumor stroma (microenvironment) in addition to its expression in the tumor epithelium. RESULTS: Testosterone uptake followed a concentration gradient but unlike in passive diffusion, was saturable and temperature-dependent, thus suggesting facilitated transport. Suppression of UGT2B17 to abrogate a testosterone gradient reduced testosterone transport while overexpression of the enzyme enhanced it. The facilitated transport suggests a paracrine route of testosterone uptake for maintaining optimal intracellular levels. We found that AKR1C3 was expressed in the tumor microenvironment of CRPC metastases in addition to epithelial cells and the pattern of relative abundance of the enzyme in epithelium vs stroma varied substantially between the metastatic sites. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that in addition to testosterone transport and metabolism by tumor epithelium, testosterone could also be produced by components of the tumor microenvironment. Facilitated testosterone uptake by tumor cells supports a cell nonautonomous mechanism for testosterone signaling in CRPC.
BACKGROUND:Testosterone is a driver of prostate cancer (PC) growth via ligand-mediated activation of the androgen receptor (AR). Tumors that have escaped systemic androgen deprivation, castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPC), have measurable intratumoral levels of testosterone, suggesting that a resistance mechanism still depends on androgen-simulated growth. However, AR activation requires an optimal intracellular concentration of androgens, a situation challenged by low circulating testosterone concentrations. Notably, PC cells may optimize their androgen levels by regulating the expression of steroid metabolism enzymes that convert androgen precursors into androgens. Here we propose that testosterone entry into the cell could be another control point. METHODS: To determine whether testosterone enters cells via a transporter, we performed in vitro 3 H-testosterone uptake assays in androgen-dependent LNCaP and androgen and AR-independent PC3 cells. To determine if the uptake mechanism depended on a concentration gradient, we modified UGT2B17 levels in LNCaP cells and measured androgen levels by liquid-liquid extraction-mass spectrometry. We also analyzed CRPC metastases for expression of AKR1C3 to determine whether this enzyme that converts adrenal androgens to testosterone was present in the tumor stroma (microenvironment) in addition to its expression in the tumor epithelium. RESULTS:Testosterone uptake followed a concentration gradient but unlike in passive diffusion, was saturable and temperature-dependent, thus suggesting facilitated transport. Suppression of UGT2B17 to abrogate a testosterone gradient reduced testosteronetransport while overexpression of the enzyme enhanced it. The facilitated transport suggests a paracrine route of testosterone uptake for maintaining optimal intracellular levels. We found that AKR1C3 was expressed in the tumor microenvironment of CRPC metastases in addition to epithelial cells and the pattern of relative abundance of the enzyme in epithelium vs stroma varied substantially between the metastatic sites. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that in addition to testosteronetransport and metabolism by tumor epithelium, testosterone could also be produced by components of the tumor microenvironment. Facilitated testosterone uptake by tumor cells supports a cell nonautonomous mechanism for testosterone signaling in CRPC.
Authors: Tristan M Sissung; Ariel M Ley; Jonathan D Strope; Edel M McCrea; Shaunna Beedie; Cody J Peer; Suneet Shukla; Jennifer van Velkinburgh; Kelie Reece; Sarah Troutman; Tessa Campbell; Elena Fernandez; Phoebe Huang; Jordan Smith; Nilay Thakkar; David J Venzon; Stefan Brenner; Wooin Lee; Maria Merino; Ji Luo; Walter Jager; Douglas K Price; Cindy H Chau; William D Figg Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Michael Stanbrough; Glenn J Bubley; Kenneth Ross; Todd R Golub; Mark A Rubin; Trevor M Penning; Phillip G Febbo; Steven P Balk Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Bo-Ying Bao; Bin-Fay Chuang; Qianben Wang; Oliver Sartor; Steven P Balk; Myles Brown; Philip W Kantoff; Gwo-Shu Mary Lee Journal: Prostate Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Elahe A Mostaghel; Ailin Zhang; Susana Hernandez; Brett T Marck; Xiaotun Zhang; Daniel Tamae; Heather E Biehl; Maria Tretiakova; Jon Bartlett; John Burns; Ruth Dumpit; Lisa Ang; Alvin M Matsumoto; Trevor M Penning; Steven P Balk; Colm Morrissey; Eva Corey; Lawrence D True; Peter S Nelson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Akash Kumar; Ilsa Coleman; Colm Morrissey; Xiaotun Zhang; Lawrence D True; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni; Hamid Bolouri; Bruce Montgomery; Thomas White; Jared M Lucas; Lisha G Brown; Ruth F Dumpit; Navonil DeSarkar; Celestia Higano; Evan Y Yu; Roger Coleman; Nikolaus Schultz; Min Fang; Paul H Lange; Jay Shendure; Robert L Vessella; Peter S Nelson Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Michael V Fiandalo; John J Stocking; Elena A Pop; John H Wilton; Krystin M Mantione; Yun Li; Kristopher M Attwood; Gissou Azabdaftari; Yue Wu; David S Watt; Elizabeth M Wilson; James L Mohler Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-01-10
Authors: Jeffrey M McManus; Kelsey Bohn; Mohammad Alyamani; Yoon-Mi Chung; Eric A Klein; Nima Sharifi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 3.240