| Literature DB >> 31376076 |
Atsushi Naganuma1,2, Ken Sato3, Toru Fukuchi2, Masashi Namikawa2, Satoru Kakizaki4, Toshio Uraoka4, Hiroshi Ohnishi5, Hiroaki Okamoto5.
Abstract
Direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA)-based therapies have been the 1st choice of antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C throughout the world. The treatment period of DAA-based therapy has been greatly shortened by the improvement of their efficiency. Thus, glecaprevir (GLE)/pibrentasvir (PIB) therapy has enabled the therapeutic period to be reduced from 12 to 8 weeks in cases of genotype 1 or 2 chronic hepatitis C without liver cirrhosis. Currently, there is no established rescue therapy for patients who experience treatment failure on GLE/PIB therapy; however, some patients have been rescued by other regimens, including sofosbuvir (SOF)/velpatasvir (VEL) plus ribavirin (RBV) therapy and GLE/PIB, SOF, and RBV therapy. We experienced the case of a DAA-naïve non-cirrhotic patient with genotype 2a who showed virologic relapse at post-treatment week 13 following 8-week GLE/PIB therapy. After we confirmed that he did not have resistance-associated substitutions against GLE or PIB, we tried to rescue the patient using prolonged (12-week) GLE/PIB therapy. Fortunately, a sustained virologic response was achieved without any adverse events. Although this was a single-case report and is assumed to be rare, the same regimen might be effective for treatment failure with 8-week GLE/PIB therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic hepatitis C; Direct-acting antiviral agents; Rescue therapy; Treatment failure; Treatment period
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31376076 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-019-01029-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1865-7265