Literature DB >> 31375858

The p value wars (again).

Ulrich Dirnagl1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID： 31375858     DOI： 10.1007/s00259-019-04467-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN： 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


× No keyword cloud information.
  19 in total

1.  Remove, rather than redefine, statistical significance.

Authors:  Valentin Amrhein; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-01

2.  Scientists rise up against statistical significance.

Authors:  Valentin Amrhein; Sander Greenland; Blake McShane
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The Importance of Predefined Rules and Prespecified Statistical Analyses: Do Not Abandon Significance.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Resetting the bar: Statistical significance in whole-genome sequencing-based association studies of global populations.

Authors:  Sara L Pulit; Sera A J de With; Paul I W de Bakker
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 5.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  A comprehensive review of genetic association studies.

Authors:  Joel N Hirschhorn; Kirk Lohmueller; Edward Byrne; Kurt Hirschhorn
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Daniele Fanelli; Debbie Drake Dunne; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Distinguishing between exploratory and confirmatory preclinical research will improve translation.

Authors:  Jonathan Kimmelman; Jeffrey S Mogil; Ulrich Dirnagl
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice.

Authors:  Joanna Diong; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Martin E Héroux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240
View more
  3 in total

1.  Editorial commentary to "18F-Fluorocholine PET uptake correlates with pathologic evidence of recurrent tumor after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases" by Grkovski and colleagues.

Authors:  Pierre Lovinfosse; Selma Ben Mustapha; Nadia Withofs
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Phylogenetic diversity analysis of shotgun metagenomic reads describes gut microbiome development and treatment effects in the post-weaned pig.

Authors:  Daniela Gaio; Matthew Z DeMaere; Kay Anantanawat; Graeme J Eamens; Linda Falconer; Toni A Chapman; Steven Djordjevic; Aaron E Darling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Improving target assessment in biomedical research: the GOT-IT recommendations.

Authors:  Christoph H Emmerich; Lorena Martinez Gamboa; Martine C J Hofmann; Marc Bonin-Andresen; Olga Arbach; Pascal Schendel; Björn Gerlach; Katja Hempel; Anton Bespalov; Ulrich Dirnagl; Michael J Parnham
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 112.288
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.