Jiajun Liu1,2, Rengyun Liu1, Xiaopei Shen1, Guangwu Zhu1, Biao Li2, Mingzhao Xing3. 1. Laboratory for Cellular and Molecular Thyroid Research, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 3. Laboratory for Cellular and Molecular Thyroid Research, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and mxing1@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations, particularly their genetic duet, are well known to be associated with poor clinical outcomes of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Loss of radioactive iodine (RAI) avidity in recurrent PTC is a major cause of treatment failure and hence poor clinical outcomes. This study investigated the role of mutation patterns in loss of RAI avidity in recurrent PTC. Methods: This was a retrospective study of the relationship between loss of RAI avidity in structural recurrent PTC and the genotype patterns of BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations in 164 patients (104 women and 60 men) with a median age of 50 y (interquartile range, 35-62 y). Results: The overall prevalence of RAI avidity loss in recurrent PTC was 62.8% (103/164). When the cohort was divided into mutation and wild-type groups, the RAI avidity loss was 80.4% versus 33.9% (P < 0.001) in BRAF V600E versus wild-type BRAF patients, with an adjusted odds ratio of 7.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.24-16.27), and 89.4% versus 52.1% (P < 0.001) in TERT mutation versus wild-type patients, with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.89 (95% CI, 2.28-25.66). When the cohort was divided into 4 genotypes, the RAI avidity loss was 70.3% (45/64), 55.6% (5/9), and 97.4% (37/38) in patients with BRAF V600E alone, TERT mutation alone, and the genetic duet of coexisting BRAF and TERT mutations, versus 30.2% (16/53) in patients with neither mutation (P < 0.001, = 0.251, and < 0.001, respectively). These corresponded to odds ratios of 5.39 (95% CI, 2.31-13.13), 2.84 (95% CI, 0.53-16.32), and 81.04 (95% CI, 11.67-3559.83), respectively. The synergy index was 13.28 (95% CI, 1.54-114.46; P = 0.019) between BRAF V600E and TERT mutation in cooperatively affecting RAI avidity. A similar genotype-associated expression pattern was observed for thyroid iodide-handling genes. Conclusion: BRAF V600E alone and, particularly, coexisting BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations are strongly associated with loss of RAI avidity and impairment of the iodide-metabolizing machinery in recurrent PTC, showing a robust predictive value for failure of RAI treatment of PTC.
BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations, particularly their genetic duet, are well known to be associated with poor clinical outcomes of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Loss of radioactive iodine (RAI) avidity in recurrent PTC is a major cause of treatment failure and hence poor clinical outcomes. This study investigated the role of mutation patterns in loss of RAI avidity in recurrent PTC. Methods: This was a retrospective study of the relationship between loss of RAI avidity in structural recurrent PTC and the genotype patterns of BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations in 164 patients (104 women and 60 men) with a median age of 50 y (interquartile range, 35-62 y). Results: The overall prevalence of RAI avidity loss in recurrent PTC was 62.8% (103/164). When the cohort was divided into mutation and wild-type groups, the RAI avidity loss was 80.4% versus 33.9% (P < 0.001) in BRAF V600E versus wild-type BRAF patients, with an adjusted odds ratio of 7.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.24-16.27), and 89.4% versus 52.1% (P < 0.001) in TERT mutation versus wild-type patients, with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.89 (95% CI, 2.28-25.66). When the cohort was divided into 4 genotypes, the RAI avidity loss was 70.3% (45/64), 55.6% (5/9), and 97.4% (37/38) in patients with BRAF V600E alone, TERT mutation alone, and the genetic duet of coexisting BRAF and TERT mutations, versus 30.2% (16/53) in patients with neither mutation (P < 0.001, = 0.251, and < 0.001, respectively). These corresponded to odds ratios of 5.39 (95% CI, 2.31-13.13), 2.84 (95% CI, 0.53-16.32), and 81.04 (95% CI, 11.67-3559.83), respectively. The synergy index was 13.28 (95% CI, 1.54-114.46; P = 0.019) between BRAF V600E and TERT mutation in cooperatively affecting RAI avidity. A similar genotype-associated expression pattern was observed for thyroid iodide-handling genes. Conclusion: BRAF V600E alone and, particularly, coexisting BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations are strongly associated with loss of RAI avidity and impairment of the iodide-metabolizing machinery in recurrent PTC, showing a robust predictive value for failure of RAI treatment of PTC.
Authors: Tomas Andersson; Lars Alfredsson; Henrik Källberg; Slobodan Zdravkovic; Anders Ahlbom Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2005 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Mingzhao Xing; William H Westra; Ralph P Tufano; Yoram Cohen; Eli Rosenbaum; Kerry J Rhoden; Kathryn A Carson; Vasily Vasko; Alexandr Larin; Giovanni Tallini; Sara Tolaney; Elizabeth H Holt; Pei Hui; Christopher B Umbricht; Shehzad Basaria; Marge Ewertz; Anthony P Tufaro; Joseph A Califano; Matthew D Ringel; Martha A Zeiger; David Sidransky; Paul W Ladenson Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-09-20 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: G Riesco-Eizaguirre; P Gutiérrez-Martínez; M A García-Cabezas; M Nistal; P Santisteban Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Paula Soares; Antónia Afonso Póvoa; Miguel Melo; João Vinagre; Valdemar Máximo; Catarina Eloy; José Manuel Cameselle-Teijeiro; Manuel Sobrinho-Simões Journal: Endocr Pathol Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 3.943
Authors: Laura Boucai; Venkatraman Seshan; Michelle Williams; Jeffrey A Knauf; Mahesh Saqcena; Ronald A Ghossein; James A Fagin Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Myat Han Soe; Janet M Chiang; Robert R Flavell; Elham Khanafshar; Laura Mendoza; Hyunseok Kang; Chienying Liu Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 6.134