Literature DB >> 31375380

A single session of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied over the affected primary motor cortex does not alter gait parameters in chronic stroke survivors.

Thomas Cattagni1, Maxime Geiger2, Anthony Supiot2, Philippe de Mazancourt2, Didier Pradon2, Raphael Zory3, Nicolas Roche2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The excitability of some neural circuits involved in walking and affected in individuals with chronic stroke can be modulated during and/or immediately after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS). This study was designed to investigate the effects of a-tDCS during and immediately after application on leg muscle activity during gait, and on spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters in patients with chronic stroke.
METHODS: This study was randomized, sham-controlled and double-blinded with a cross-over design and included 24 individuals with chronic stroke. Each participant underwent one 30-minute session each of effective a-tDCS at 2mA and sham tDCS. In both sessions, the anode was placed over the leg motor cortex of the affected hemisphere and the cathode over the contralateral orbit. Six gait trials were performed before, during and immediately after each effective/sham tDCS session. Electromyographic activity of leg muscles, as well as spatiotemporal (e.g. gait speed) and kinematic (e.g. peak knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase of gait) gait parameters were recorded. Genotyping for the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism was undertaken since this gene may influence motor skill learning and the effects of tDCS.
RESULTS: No significant effects of a-tDCS on gait parameters were found either for the total group or for the Val66Met (N=10) and Val66Val (N=14) subgroups.
CONCLUSION: A single session of a-tDCS delivered to the leg motor cortex did not immediately improve gait parameters in individuals with chronic stroke, regardless of their BDNF genotype.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; Lower limb muscles; Spasticity; TDCS; Walking

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31375380     DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2019.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin        ISSN: 0987-7053            Impact factor:   3.734


  6 in total

1.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Supplementary Motor Area Combined with Walking on the Intramuscular Coherence of the Tibialis Anterior in a Subacute Post-Stroke Patient: A Single-Case Study.

Authors:  Naruhito Hasui; Naomichi Mizuta; Junji Taguchi; Tomoki Nakatani; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-23

2.  Different Effects of 2 mA and 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Muscle Activity and Torque in a Maximal Isokinetic Fatigue Task.

Authors:  Craig David Workman; Alexandra C Fietsam; Thorsten Rudroff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Non-invasive brain stimulation for improving gait, balance, and lower limbs motor function in stroke.

Authors:  Jitka Veldema; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.208

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for gait recovery following stroke: A systematic review of current literature and beyond.

Authors:  Xavier Corominas-Teruel; Rosa María San Segundo Mozo; Montserrat Fibla Simó; Maria Teresa Colomina Fosch; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Cortical priming strategies for gait training after stroke: a controlled, stratified trial.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; Brice T Cleland; Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; Sally Freels; Hyosok Lim; Fernando D Testai; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Comparing different montages of transcranial direct current stimulation on dual-task walking and cortical activity in chronic stroke: double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pei-Ling Wong; Yea-Ru Yang; Shun-Chang Tang; Shi-Fong Huang; Ray-Yau Wang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.474

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.