Literature DB >> 31375370

Letters of Recommendation.

Gus M Garmel1, Casey A Grover2, Antonia Quinn3, Shahram Lotfipour4, Mark I Langdorf4, Mohamad Ali Cheaito5, Michael Epter6, Amin Kazzi7.   

Abstract

Letters of recommendation (LORs) are a central element of an applicant's portfolio for the National Resident Matching Program (known as the "Match"). This is especially true when applying to competitive specialties like emergency medicine (EM). LORs convey an applicant's potential for success, and also highlight an applicant's qualities that cannot always be recognized from a curriculum vitae, test scores, or grades. Traditional LORs, also called narrative LORs, are written in prose and are therefore highly subjective. This led to the establishment of a task force by the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors in 1995 to develop a standardized LOR. Revisions of this form are now referred to as a standardized letter of evaluation. These evaluations in this format have proven to increase inter-rater reliability, decrease interpretation time, and standardize the process used by EM faculty to prepare evaluations for EM applicants. In this article, we will discuss LORs; address applicants' concerns, including from whom to request LORs (EM faculty vs. non-EM faculty vs. non-clinical faculty), number of LORs an applicant should include in his or her application materials, the preferred manner of requesting and the timing in which to ask for an LOR, as well as the philosophy behind waiving the right to see the letter.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  CORD; NRMP; SLOE; applicant; emergency medicine; letters of recommendation; match; medical student

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31375370     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  6 in total

1.  An Examination of Standardized Letters of Recommendation Rating Scales Among Neurosurgical Residency Candidates During the 2020-2021 Application Cycle.

Authors:  Michael J Feldman; Alexander V Ortiz; Steven G Roth; Robert J Dambrino; Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Rohan V Chitale; Lola B Chambless
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Internal Medicine Residency Program Responses to the Increase of Residency Applications: Differences by Program Type and Characteristics.

Authors:  Michelle L Sweet; Christopher M Williams; Emily Stewart; Saumil M Chudgar; Steven V Angus; Michael Kisielewski; Lisa L Willett
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

3.  Attitudes towards and impact of letters of recommendation for anesthesiology residency applicants.

Authors:  Carl E Jn Pierre; Garret M Weber; Apolonia E Abramowicz
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2021-12

4.  Medical School to Residency: How Can We Trust the Process?

Authors:  Gary L Beck Dallaghan; Irene Alexandraki; Jennifer Christner; Meg Keeley; Sorabh Khandelwal; Beat Steiner; Paul A Hemmer
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-14

5.  Residency Program Director Perspectives on Changes to US Medical Licensing Examination.

Authors:  Andrew Wang; Krystal L Karunungan; Jacob D Story; Edward L Ha; Clarence H Braddock
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01

6.  Reference letters for subspecialty medicine residency positions: are they valuable for decision-making? Results from a Canadian study.

Authors:  Deepti Chopra; Mala Joneja; Gurjit Sandhu; Christopher A Smith; Catherine M Spagnuolo; Lawrence Hookey
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.