Wyatt A Loflin1, Jeryl D English1, Catharine Borders1, Lacey M Harris1, Audrey Moon1, J Nathaniel Holland2, F Kurtis Kasper3. 1. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Tex. 2. Office of Research, School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Tex. 3. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Tex; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Tex. Electronic address: fred.k.kasper@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Many variables can affect the accuracy of 3D-printed orthodontic models, and the effects of different printing parameters on the clinical utility of the printed models are just beginning to be understood. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed orthodontic models with the use of the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation grading system. METHODS: Twelve cases were scanned using a desktop model scanner and 3D-printed using a stereolithography-based printer at three different layer heights (25, 50, and 100-μm; n = 12 per group). All models were scored by eleven graders using the Cast-Radiograph Evaluation grading system. All models were scored a second time, at least two weeks later. RESULTS: No statistically significant effects of print layer height were found on the scoring of the models for any of the grading metrics or total score. 3D-printed models of each layer height were highly positively correlated with stone models for the total score, with the strongest correlation found with models printed at 100-μm. CONCLUSIONS: 100-μm layer height 3D-printed models are potentially clinically acceptable for the purposes of evaluation of treatment outcomes, diagnosis and treatment planning, and residency training.
INTRODUCTION: Many variables can affect the accuracy of 3D-printed orthodontic models, and the effects of different printing parameters on the clinical utility of the printed models are just beginning to be understood. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed orthodontic models with the use of the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation grading system. METHODS: Twelve cases were scanned using a desktop model scanner and 3D-printed using a stereolithography-based printer at three different layer heights (25, 50, and 100-μm; n = 12 per group). All models were scored by eleven graders using the Cast-Radiograph Evaluation grading system. All models were scored a second time, at least two weeks later. RESULTS: No statistically significant effects of print layer height were found on the scoring of the models for any of the grading metrics or total score. 3D-printed models of each layer height were highly positively correlated with stone models for the total score, with the strongest correlation found with models printed at 100-μm. CONCLUSIONS: 100-μm layer height 3D-printed models are potentially clinically acceptable for the purposes of evaluation of treatment outcomes, diagnosis and treatment planning, and residency training.