Literature DB >> 31374460

Discontinuation of disease-modifying therapy for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Effect on clinical and MRI outcomes.

Hajime Yano1, Cindy Gonzalez1, Brian C Healy1, Bonnie I Glanz1, Howard L Weiner1, Tanuja Chitnis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have been shown to reduce relapses and new MRI lesions. However, few studies have assessed the impact of discontinuing DMT after a period of disease inactivity.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of DMT discontinuation on clinical and radiological outcomes in RRMS patients.
METHODS: 69 RRMS patients who discontinued DMT after a period of disease inactivity were identified from the Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigation of MS study at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, based on the following inclusion criteria: age 18 or older; treated with DMT ≥2 years; no clinical and radiological relapse ≥2 years until the discontinuation; not restarting DMT for ≥6 months after discontinuation. Patients matched by age, gender, treatment, treatment duration, disease duration and Expanded Disability Status Scale score who remained on DMT were identified. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with robust standard errors to account for the paired data were used to test the differences based on DMT discontinuation with the outcome measures: time to clinical relapse, MRI event, disability progression, and disease activity (either clinical relapse or MRI event).
RESULTS: Based on the 69 pairs of patients, discontinuation was not associated with time to clinical relapse (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.44-1.72, p = 0.69), MRI event (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.59, p = 0.84), disability progression (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.61 to 2.53, p = 0.55) and disease activity (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.56 to 1.42, p = 0.62). When we performed subgroup analysis to compare the impact of DMT discontinuation between older (age > 45) and younger (age ≤ 45) patients, we found a significant difference in the association between young and old for time to MRI event (p = 0.012) and time to new disease activity (p = 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients who discontinued treatment after a period of disease inactivity had a similar time to next event compared to subjects who remained on first-generation DMTs. In our cohort, we found that discontinuation after age 45 was associated with a stable disease course, while patients younger than age 45 who discontinued treatment were more likely to experience a new clinical relapse or MRI event.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discontinuation; Disease modifying therapy; Multiple sclerosis; Natural history; Observational study

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31374460     DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord        ISSN: 2211-0348            Impact factor:   4.339


  9 in total

1.  Discontinuation of second- versus first-line disease-modifying treatment in middle-aged patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Maëlle Chappuis; Chloé Rousseau; Emma Bajeux; Sandrine Wiertlewski; David Laplaud; Emmanuelle Le Page; Laure Michel; Gilles Edan; Anne Kerbrat
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 6.682

2.  Disease-modifying therapy prescription patterns in people with multiple sclerosis by age.

Authors:  Yinan Zhang; Amber Salter; Shan Jin; William J Culpepper; Gary R Cutter; Mitchell Wallin; Olaf Stuve
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.570

3.  Improving quality, affordability, and equity of multiple sclerosis care.

Authors:  Annette Langer-Gould; Shilpa Klocke; Brandon Beaber; Sonu M Brara; Julie Debacker; Oluwasheyi Ayeni; Allen S Nielsen
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.511

4.  Defining Benign/Burnt-Out MS and Discontinuing Disease-Modifying Therapies.

Authors:  Derek McFaul; Nektar N Hakopian; Jessica B Smith; Allen Scott Nielsen; Annette Langer-Gould
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2021-02-08

5.  The Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Optimization Program.

Authors:  Annette Langer-Gould; Stephen C Cheng; Bonnie H Li; Michael H Kanter
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.511

6.  Decreasing Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Expenditures and Improving Quality at the Health System Level.

Authors:  Annette Langer-Gould; Stephen C Cheng; Bonnie H Li; Jessica B Smith; Michael H Kanter
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 11.274

7.  Should I stop or should I go on? Disease modifying therapy after the first clinical episode of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Tobias Monschein; Sabine Salhofer-Polanyi; Patrick Altmann; Tobias Zrzavy; Assunta Dal-Bianco; Gabriel Bsteh; Paulus Rommer; Thomas Berger; Fritz Leutmezer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Controversy on the treatment of multiple sclerosis and related disorders: positional statement of the expert panel in charge of the 2021 DGN Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum diseases and MOG-IgG-associated disorders.

Authors:  A Bayas; A Berthele; B Hemmer; C Warnke; B Wildemann
Journal:  Neurol Res Pract       Date:  2021-08-06

9.  Probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies in multiple sclerosis and its animal models: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Lorrie L Blais; Theresa L Montgomery; Eyal Amiel; Paula B Deming; Dimitry N Krementsov
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.