Literature DB >> 31372651

Nonparametric expression analysis using inferential replicate counts.

Anqi Zhu1, Avi Srivastava2, Joseph G Ibrahim1, Rob Patro2, Michael I Love1,3.   

Abstract

A primary challenge in the analysis of RNA-seq data is to identify differentially expressed genes or transcripts while controlling for technical biases. Ideally, a statistical testing procedure should incorporate the inherent uncertainty of the abundance estimates arising from the quantification step. Most popular methods for RNA-seq differential expression analysis fit a parametric model to the counts for each gene or transcript, and a subset of methods can incorporate uncertainty. Previous work has shown that nonparametric models for RNA-seq differential expression may have better control of the false discovery rate, and adapt well to new data types without requiring reformulation of a parametric model. Existing nonparametric models do not take into account inferential uncertainty, leading to an inflated false discovery rate, in particular at the transcript level. We propose a nonparametric model for differential expression analysis using inferential replicate counts, extending the existing SAMseq method to account for inferential uncertainty. We compare our method, Swish, with popular differential expression analysis methods. Swish has improved control of the false discovery rate, in particular for transcripts with high inferential uncertainty. We apply Swish to a single-cell RNA-seq dataset, assessing differential expression between sub-populations of cells, and compare its performance to the Wilcoxon test.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31372651      PMCID: PMC6765120          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  51 in total

1.  Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Allon M Klein; Linas Mazutis; Ilke Akartuna; Naren Tallapragada; Adrian Veres; Victor Li; Leonid Peshkin; David A Weitz; Marc W Kirschner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  SAFE-clustering: Single-cell Aggregated (from Ensemble) clustering for single-cell RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Yuchen Yang; Ruth Huh; Houston W Culpepper; Yuan Lin; Michael I Love; Yun Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  iCOBRA: open, reproducible, standardized and live method benchmarking.

Authors:  Charlotte Soneson; Mark D Robinson
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  svaseq: removing batch effects and other unwanted noise from sequencing data.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Leek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation.

Authors:  Davis J McCarthy; Yunshun Chen; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts.

Authors:  Charity W Law; Yunshun Chen; Wei Shi; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  How many biological replicates are needed in an RNA-seq experiment and which differential expression tool should you use?

Authors:  Nicholas J Schurch; Pietá Schofield; Marek Gierliński; Christian Cole; Alexander Sherstnev; Vijender Singh; Nicola Wrobel; Karim Gharbi; Gordon G Simpson; Tom Owen-Hughes; Mark Blaxter; Geoffrey J Barton
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  How well do RNA-Seq differential gene expression tools perform in a complex eukaryote? A case study in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Kimon Froussios; Nick J Schurch; Katarzyna Mackinnon; Marek Gierliński; Céline Duc; Gordon G Simpson; Geoffrey J Barton
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Modeling of RNA-seq fragment sequence bias reduces systematic errors in transcript abundance estimation.

Authors:  Michael I Love; John B Hogenesch; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Splatter: simulation of single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Luke Zappia; Belinda Phipson; Alicia Oshlack
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  9 in total

1.  Statistical Modeling of High Dimensional Counts.

Authors:  Michael I Love
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Polee: RNA-Seq analysis using approximate likelihood.

Authors:  Daniel C Jones; Walter L Ruzzo
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2021-05-25

3.  mitch: multi-contrast pathway enrichment for multi-omics and single-cell profiling data.

Authors:  Antony Kaspi; Mark Ziemann
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 4.  Best practices on the differential expression analysis of multi-species RNA-seq.

Authors:  Matthew Chung; Vincent M Bruno; David A Rasko; Christina A Cuomo; José F Muñoz; Jonathan Livny; Amol C Shetty; Anup Mahurkar; Julie C Dunning Hotopp
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Compression of quantification uncertainty for scRNA-seq counts.

Authors:  Scott Van Buren; Hirak Sarkar; Avi Srivastava; Naim U Rashid; Rob Patro; Michael I Love
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  FOXA1 regulates alternative splicing in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marco Del Giudice; John G Foster; Serena Peirone; Alberto Rissone; Livia Caizzi; Federica Gaudino; Caterina Parlato; Francesca Anselmi; Rebecca Arkell; Simonetta Guarrera; Salvatore Oliviero; Giuseppe Basso; Prabhakar Rajan; Matteo Cereda
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 9.995

7.  Terminus enables the discovery of data-driven, robust transcript groups from RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Hirak Sarkar; Avi Srivastava; Héctor Corrada Bravo; Michael I Love; Rob Patro
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Tximeta: Reference sequence checksums for provenance identification in RNA-seq.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Charlotte Soneson; Peter F Hickey; Lisa K Johnson; N Tessa Pierce; Lori Shepherd; Martin Morgan; Rob Patro
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Perplexity: evaluating transcript abundance estimation in the absence of ground truth.

Authors:  Jason Fan; Skylar Chan; Rob Patro
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 1.405

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.