| Literature DB >> 31372587 |
Sunil Kumar Mishra1, Mohammad Shafi Kuchay1, Ishita Barat Sen2, Arpit Garg1, Sanjay Saran Baijal3, Ambrish Mithal1.
Abstract
Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a curable condition when the tumor is correctly located and completely removed. These tumors are, however, small and located in regions that make surgical removal difficult and sometimes risky in some patients. Experience of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the management of TIO is limited. We describe 3 patients with TIO who were treated in our hospital with RFA. They had suspected lesions in surgically difficult locations and were subjected to single sessions of RFA. The response was documented in terms of improvement in symptoms, normalization of hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphaturia, and disappearance of uptake on follow-up Ga68 DOTANOC PET/CT imaging. All 3 patients had a clinical and biochemical profile consistent with TIO. The first patient (patient 1) had an intensely Ga68 DOTANOC avid lesion involving the roof of right acetabulum. The second patient (patient 2) had a Ga68 DOTANOC avid intramuscular lesion in left pectineus muscle and the third patient (patient 3) had a Ga68 DOTANOC avid expansile osteolytic lesion involving the angle and ramus of right mandible. All 3 patients achieved complete biochemical as well as clinical remission with single sessions of RFA. Six months after the procedure, Ga68 DOTANOC imaging revealed the absence of uptake at the previous sites, corroborating with the clinical improvement and normalization of hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphaturia. In conclusion, although surgical resection is the standard of care, RFA can be used successfully for treating patients with TIO. It can be an effective, less invasive, and safe modality of treatment in those patients where resection of the lesion is not possible because of inaccessible anatomical location or comorbidity that prohibits surgery.Entities:
Keywords: HYPOPHOSPHATEMIA; ONCOGENIC OSTEOMALACIA; PHOSPHATURIA; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; RENAL PHOSPHATE WASTING; TUMOR‐INDUCED OSTEOMALACIA
Year: 2019 PMID: 31372587 PMCID: PMC6659451 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JBMR Plus ISSN: 2473-4039
Biochemical Evaluation of Patients 1 to 3, Pre‐RFA and Post‐RFA
| Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Pre‐RFA | Post‐RFA (day 14) | Pre‐RFA | Post‐RFA (day 7) | Pre‐RFA | Post‐RFA (day 14) | Normal range |
| Albumin‐corrected total calcium (mg/dL) | 10.2, 10.3 | 9.3, 9.8 | 10.0, 9.7 | 9.4, 9.6 | 9.9, 9.5 | 9.5, 9.6 | 8.5–10.4 |
| Serum phosphorus (mg/dL) | 1.3, 1.5 | 2.8, 3.0 | 1.4, 1.5 | 3.1, 3.4 | 2.0, 1.8 | 3.1, 3.3 | 2.4‐4.4 |
| Serum ALP (U/L) | 279 | 286 | 705 | 221 | 212 | 272 | 30–120 |
| Serum 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | 19.3 | — | 62.6 | 54.2 | 49.6 | 52 | 50–250 |
| 1,25(OH)2D (pmol/L) | 20.0 | — | 38.2 | — | 50.1 | – | 47.7–190.3 |
| Intact PTH (pg/mL) | 52.7 | 81.6 | 52.7 | 61.0 | 212.0 | 41 | 14.0–72.0 |
| TRP (%) | 81 | 90 | 80 | 91 | 75 | 90 | 88–95 |
| TMP/GFR (mg/dL) | 1.5 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 2.8–4.4 |
| c‐FGF‐23 (RU/mL) | 453.0 | — | 960.0 | 135.0 | 101.8 | — | <180 |
| Site of lesion | Roof of right acetabulum | Left pectineus muscle | Angle and ramus of right mandible | — | |||
| Duration of follow‐up after RFA (months) | 24 | 24 | 10 | — | |||
RFA = radiofrequency ablation; ALP= alkaline phosphatase; 25(OH)D = 25 hydroxyvitamin D; 1,25(OH)2D = 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D; PTH = parathyroid hormone; TRP = tubular reabsorption of phosphate; TMP/GFR = ratio of tubular maximum reabsorption of phosphate to glomerular filtration rate; c‐FGF‐23 = C‐terminal fibroblast growth factor‐23.
TRP (%) is calculated according to the formula: 100 × (1 − [urine phosphate/urine creatinine] × [serum creatinine/serum phosphate]).
Carboxy‐terminal FGF‐23 (ELISA, Immutopics, Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA).
Figure 1Pre‐ and post‐RFA Ga68 DOTANOC PET/CT scans of patient 1. Axial and sagittal views of the lesion in patient 1. Post‐RFA images demonstrate disappearance of the uptake at the lesion site. Arrows indicate the lesion.
Figure 2Electrode of RFA in situ, expansile lesion in the angle of right mandible, as indicated by arrow (patient 3).
Review of Similar Reports in the Literature
| Parameters | Hesse et al., NEJM 2007 | Jadhav et al., JCEM 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Case 1 | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
| Age (years) | 40 | 38 | 28 | 49 |
| Sex (M/F) | F | M | F | M |
| Duration of symptoms (years) | NA | 6 | 8 | 17 |
| Pre‐RFA serum phosphorus (mg/dL) | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Post‐RFA (day 7) serum phosphorus (mg/dL) | NA | 3.5 | 2.6 | 2.03 |
| Pre‐RFA FGF‐23 (RU/mL) | NA | 144.9 | 162.4 | 6000 |
| Post‐RFA (day 7) FGF‐23 (RU/mL) | NA | 23 | 41 | 5500 |
| Pre‐RFA TMP/GFR (%) | 0.8 | 1.25 | 0.68 | 0.25 |
| Imaging | FDG PET‐CT | 99mTc HYNIC TOC | ||
| Site of lesion | Head, right femur | Head, right femur | Proximal shaft, left femur | Lower end, left femur |
| Size (mm) | NA | 15 × 12 | 13 × 12 | 56 × 65 |
| Histopathology | Benign mesenchymal tumor | NA | NA | Non‐ossifying fibroma |
| Duration of follow‐up after RFA (months) | 12 | 12 | 15 | 6 |
RFA = radiofrequency ablation; FGF‐23 = fibroblast growth factor‐23; TMP/GFR = ratio of tubular maximum reabsorption of phosphate to glomerular filtration rate.