| Literature DB >> 31372539 |
Jane Nduta Wambura1,2, Brigid Marnane2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: According to the Lancet, the successful chemoprophylaxis and the introduction of lifelong antiretroviral therapy programs to eliminate mother to child transmission of HIV has promoted the rise in number of HIV exposed uninfected (HEU) infants. In resource limited settings, these infants are at an increased risk of undernutrition due to risk factors such as low birth weight, food insecurity, household composition, income and improper feeding patterns. As several other studies have suggested, the risk factors vary from one setting to another. This paper delved into reviewing the predisposing undernutrition factors in relation to HIV exposure among infants within the low resource urban setting of Mukuru Slum, in Nairobi, Kenya.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiology; First 1000 days; Food security; HEU; HIV; HUU; Maternal nutrition; Nutrition; Public health
Year: 2019 PMID: 31372539 PMCID: PMC6658733 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Sample size.
| Villages | Households with children 2 years and below | Children 2 years and below | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEU | HUU | Total | ||
| Kisii | 653 | 33 | 32 | 65 |
| Maasai | 521 | 41 | 11 | 52 |
| Hazina | 430 | 16 | 27 | 43 |
WHO cutoff points for undernutrition.
| Indicator | Weight for Length (Wasting) | Weight for Age (Underweight) | Length for Age (Stunting) | MUAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severe | <-3 SD | <-3 SD | <-3 SD | <11.5cm |
| Moderate | <-3 SD to < -2 SD | <-3 SD to < -2 SD | <-3 SD to < -2 SD | ≥11.5cm to <12.5 cm |
| Low | <-2 SD to < -1SD | <-2 SD to < -1SD | <-2 SD to < -1SD | 12.5 cm |
| Normal | <-1 SD to <2 SD | <-1 SD to <2 SD | <-1 SD to <2 SD | >12.5 cm |
| Overweight | >2 SD | >2 SD | >2 SD |
Fig. 1Distribution of the Study population according to the Weight for length indices.
Fig. 2Distribution of the study population according to the Length for Age.
Fig. 3Distribution of the study population according to weight for Age.
Fig. 4Distribution of the Study Population According to their BMI for Age.
Relationship between food availability with HIV exposure.
| Exposed | P values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| Could afford Food | 85.7% (60) | 82.2% (74) | |
| Could not afford Food | 14.3% (10) | 17.8% (16) | |
Relationship between food accessibility and HIV exposure.
| Exposed | P values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| Can access food | 41.7% (48) | 58.3% (67) | |
| Cannot access food | 31.4% (22) | 25.6% (23) | |
Relationship between food utilization and HIV exposure.
| Exposed | P values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| Slow | 24.3% (17) | 30.0% (27) | |
| Normal | 47.1% (33) | 52.2% (36) | |
| Fast | 28.6% (20) | 30.0% (27) | |
Relationship between food aid and HIV exposure.
| Exposed | P values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| Receive food | 45.7% (32) | 30.0% (27) | |
| Do not Receive food | 54.3% (38) | 70.0% (63) | |
Relationship between number of adults and HIV exposure.
| Number of Adults | Exposed | P values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| 1 | 8.6% (6) | 24.4% (22) | |
| 2 | 42.9% (30) | 45.6% (41) | |
| 3 | 40.0% (28) | 16.7% (15) | |
| 4 and above | 8.6% (6) | 13.3% (12) | |
Relationship between number of children and HIV exposure.
| Number of Children | Exposed | P values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| 1 | 51.4% (36) | 23.3% (21) | |
| 2 | 24.3% (17) | 33.3% (30) | |
| 3 | 18.6% (13) | 31.1% (28) | |
| 4 and above | 5.7% (4) | 12.2% (11) | |
Relationship between income and HIV exposure.
| Income Range | Exposed | P Values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| <=10000 | 50.0% (35) | 43.3% (39) | |
| ]10000; 20000 | 32.9% (23) | 25.6% (23) | |
| >20000 | 17.1% (12) | 30.0% (27) | |
Relationship between age of complementary food introduction and HIV exposure.
| Number of months | Exposed | P values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| 0 | 0.0% (0) | 1.1% (1) | |
| 2 | 0.0% (0) | 1.1% (1) | |
| 3 | 0.0% (0) | 3.3% (3) | |
| 4 | 4.3% (3) | 4.4% (4) | |
| 5 | 5.7% (4) | 3.3% (3) | |
| 6 | 87.1% (61) | 83.3% (75) | |
| 7 months and above | 2.9% (2) | 3.3% (3) | |
Relationship between formula of breast feeding and HIV exposure.
| Exposed | P values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| Breast Milk | 75.7% (53) | 86.7% (78) | |
| Formula Milk | 24.3% (17) | 13.3% (12) | |
Relationship between use of food supplements and HIV exposure.
| Exposed | P values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| Consume Supplements | 32.9% (23) | 94.4% (85) | |
| Do not Consume Supplements | 67.1% (47) | 5.6% (5) | |
Overall effect size of the variables on undernutrition.
| Age | Exposed | Sex | Food Aid | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ηP2 | P Values | ηp2 | P Values | ηp2 | P Values | ηp2 | P Values | |
| Overall Effect Size | 0.439 | <0.001 | 0.351 | <0.001 | 0.135 | 0.001 | 0.083 | 0.021 |
| WFLZ | 0.048 | 0.006 | 0.200 | <0.001 | 0.110 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.442 |
| LFAZ | 0.017 | 0.107 | 0.161 | <0.001 | 0.019 | 0.083 | 0.024 | 0.052 |
| WFAZ | 0.024 | 0.051 | 0.280 | <0.001 | 0.107 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.668 |
| BAZ | 0.099 | <0.001 | 0.171 | <0.001 | 0.105 | <0.001 | 0.007 | 0.289 |
| MUACZ | 0.009 | 0.249 | 0.225 | <0.001 | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.057 | 0.003 |