| Literature DB >> 31372397 |
Abiodun Olusola Omotayo1,2, Adebayo Isaiah Ogunniyi3, Adeyemi Oladapo Aremu2.
Abstract
Food insecurity or insufficiency, among other factors, is triggered by structural inequalities. Food insecurity is an inflexible problematic situation in South Africa. The country has a custom of evidence-based decision making, stocked in the findings of generalized national household surveys. Conversely, the deep insights from the heterogeneity of the sub-national analysis remain a principally unexploited means of understanding of the contextual experience of food insecurity or insufficiency in South Africa. The data present the food insufficiency status with special focus on adult and children. The data also reveal the adult and children food insufficiency status across the provinces in South Africa. The data contains socioeconomic and demographic characteristics as well the living condition and food security status of the households.Entities:
Keywords: Adult; Children; Data; Food security; Sustainable goal
Year: 2019 PMID: 31372397 PMCID: PMC6660462 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.103730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Summary statistics of some selected variables.
| Variable | Observation | Mean | Std. Dev. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age of the household head | 21,218 | 47.822 | 15.833 |
| Male-Headed households | 21,218 | 0.575 | 0.494 |
| Involve in agricultural job | 21,218 | 0.173 | 0.379 |
| Income per month | 21,218 | 9628.212 | 17,714.46 |
| Salaries/wages/commission | 21,218 | 0.521 | 0.499 |
| Income from a business | 21,218 | 0.073 | 0.261 |
| Remittances | 21,218 | 0.082 | 0.274 |
| Pensions | 21,218 | 0.020 | 0.140 |
| Grants (include old age grant | 21,218 | 0.244 | 0.429 |
| Sales of farming products and services | 21,218 | 0.001 | 0.034 |
| Other income sources e.g. | 21,218 | 0.011 | 0.106 |
| No income | 21,218 | 0.008 | 0.092 |
| Unspecified | 21,218 | 0.036 | 0.186 |
| Electricity access | 21,218 | 0.931 | 0.253 |
| Good walling condition | 21,218 | 0.657 | 0.474 |
| Good roofing condition | 21,218 | 0.621 | 0.484 |
| Flooring condition | 21,218 | 0.702 | 0.456 |
| Improved sanitation access | 21,218 | 1 | 0 |
| Improved water access | 21,218 | 1 | 0 |
| Western Cape | 21,218 | 0.101 | 0.301 |
| Eastern Cape | 21,218 | 0.132 | 0.339 |
| Northern Cape | 21,218 | 0.0434 | 0.203 |
| Free State | 21,218 | 0.061 | 0.240 |
| KwaZulu-Natal | 21,218 | 0.160 | 0.366 |
| North West | 21,218 | 0.069 | 0.253 |
| Gauteng | 21,218 | 0.239 | 0.426 |
| Mpumalanga | 21,218 | 0.081 | 0.273 |
| Limpopo | 21,218 | 0.109 | 0.312 |
| African/Black | 21,218 | 0.820 | 0.383 |
| Colored | 21,218 | 0.080 | 0.271 |
| Indian/Asian | 21,218 | 0.020 | 0.141 |
| White | 21,218 | 0.078 | 0.269 |
Source: Authors compilation, 2018.
Fig. 1Food security status in among children and adults in South Africa. Source: Authors computation, 2018.
Fig. 2Disaggregated food security status across the nine provinces in South Africa. Source: Authors computation, 2018.
Specifications table
| Subject area | Agricultural Economics, Economics |
| More specific subject area | Food security and livelihood outcomes |
| Type of data | Table, Dta. File, text file, Figure |
| How data was acquired | Household survey |
| Data format | Raw, analyzed, descriptive and statistical data |
| Experimental factors. | Samples consist of all private households in all the nine provinces of South Africa and residents in workers' hostels. |
| Experimental features | There was no experimental component in the dataset used |
| Data source location | 9 provinces in South Africa; Western Cape, Eastern Cape, Northern Cape, North West, Free State, Kwazulu Natal, Gauteng, Limpopo and Mpumalanga |
| Data accessibility | The datasets explored and analyzed are available at |
| Related research article | None |
These data present information on the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of household as it relates with food (in) security of the household members. This dataset will provide valuable information that may be functional at different levels for both government organizations (GOs) and non-government organizations (NGOs) in order to formulate appropriate policy and intervention strategy for the improvement of food for poor households in South Africa. This data allows other researchers to extend the statistical analyses in various dimension of measuring livelihood outcomes in South Africa. |