Literature DB >> 31372397

Data on food insufficiency status in South Africa: Insight from the South Africa General Household Survey.

Abiodun Olusola Omotayo1,2, Adebayo Isaiah Ogunniyi3, Adeyemi Oladapo Aremu2.   

Abstract

Food insecurity or insufficiency, among other factors, is triggered by structural inequalities. Food insecurity is an inflexible problematic situation in South Africa. The country has a custom of evidence-based decision making, stocked in the findings of generalized national household surveys. Conversely, the deep insights from the heterogeneity of the sub-national analysis remain a principally unexploited means of understanding of the contextual experience of food insecurity or insufficiency in South Africa. The data present the food insufficiency status with special focus on adult and children. The data also reveal the adult and children food insufficiency status across the provinces in South Africa. The data contains socioeconomic and demographic characteristics as well the living condition and food security status of the households.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult; Children; Data; Food security; Sustainable goal

Year:  2019        PMID: 31372397      PMCID: PMC6660462          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.103730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table These data present information on the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of household as it relates with food (in) security of the household members. This dataset will provide valuable information that may be functional at different levels for both government organizations (GOs) and non-government organizations (NGOs) in order to formulate appropriate policy and intervention strategy for the improvement of food for poor households in South Africa. This data allows other researchers to extend the statistical analyses in various dimension of measuring livelihood outcomes in South Africa.

Data

Data was made available with a well-structured household questionnaire with a unit of analysis captured at households and individuals level. A questionnaire was administered to a household to elicit information on household members. The survey covers all legally recognized household members (usual residents) of households in the nine provinces (Eastern Cape, Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, Mpumalanga, the Northern Cape, North West, and the Western Cape) of South Africa. The survey does not cover collective living quarters such as student hostels, old-age homes, hospitals, prisons, and military barracks but specifically on households. The General Household Survey (GHS) collects data on education, health and social development, housing, access to services and facilities, food security, and agriculture. The data in Table 1 show the socioeconomics and demographics characteristics of the household heads sampled in South Africa. The mean age was found to be 47.8 years (approximately 48 years) and more than half were male. The representation in this data is typical of Sub Saharan African countries [1], [2]. The highest (52.1%) source of income is through salaries or wages or commission while just 1.1% earn income through agricultural sales. The data show that over 80% of the respondents are South African/Black race while the Indian/Asia race have the least (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary statistics of some selected variables.

VariableObservationMeanStd. Dev.
Age of the household head21,21847.82215.833
Male-Headed households21,2180.5750.494
Involve in agricultural job21,2180.1730.379
Income per month21,2189628.21217,714.46
Income sources
Salaries/wages/commission21,2180.5210.499
Income from a business21,2180.0730.261
Remittances21,2180.0820.274
Pensions21,2180.0200.140
Grants (include old age grant21,2180.2440.429
Sales of farming products and services21,2180.0010.034
Other income sources e.g.21,2180.0110.106
No income21,2180.0080.092
Unspecified21,2180.0360.186
Living condition
Electricity access21,2180.9310.253
Good walling condition21,2180.6570.474
Good roofing condition21,2180.6210.484
Flooring condition21,2180.7020.456
Improved sanitation access21,21810
Improved water access21,21810
Province
Western Cape21,2180.1010.301
Eastern Cape21,2180.1320.339
Northern Cape21,2180.04340.203
Free State21,2180.0610.240
KwaZulu-Natal21,2180.1600.366
North West21,2180.0690.253
Gauteng21,2180.2390.426
Mpumalanga21,2180.0810.273
Limpopo21,2180.1090.312
Race
African/Black21,2180.8200.383
Colored21,2180.0800.271
Indian/Asian21,2180.0200.141
White21,2180.0780.269

Source: Authors compilation, 2018.

Summary statistics of some selected variables. Source: Authors compilation, 2018. In Fig. 1, using Foster–Greer–Thorbecke index (FGT Index) as well as descriptive analysis, the data show that children experienced food insufficiency more than adults in South Africa. The data reveal that over 40 percent of the children are living in household experiencing food insufficiency.
Fig. 1

Food security status in among children and adults in South Africa. Source: Authors computation, 2018.

Food security status in among children and adults in South Africa. Source: Authors computation, 2018. In the same vein, the data in Fig. 2 show the disaggregation of food security status across the 9 provinces in South Africa with special focus on children and adult. The data show that both for children and adult in, Guateng and KwaZulu-Natal experienced highest level of food insufficiency in South Africa. The data show that 22.72% and 20.66% of adult and 17.58% and 25.57% children are food insufficient in Guateng and KwaZulu-Natal province, respectively. The dataset also revealed that food insufficiency is lowest for both children (4.59) and adult (6.26) in Northern Cape Province.
Fig. 2

Disaggregated food security status across the nine provinces in South Africa. Source: Authors computation, 2018.

Disaggregated food security status across the nine provinces in South Africa. Source: Authors computation, 2018.

Experimental design, materials and methods

The dataset employed is the General Household Survey (GHS), 2016. The dataset was compiled based on stratified two-stage design, and a total of rural and urban 21,218 households were interviewed containing 72,604 respondents. The dataset were coded in SPSS software 22 version which the descriptive part of the research such as mean, frequency, standard deviation were carried out. In addition, the inferencial statistics were carried out on STATA package 13 using the FGT index to classify the respondents into food secured or otherwise. The dataset was robust and representative enough to generalize on the household food sufficiency status of South Africa. Acknowledgements

Specifications table

Subject areaAgricultural Economics, Economics
More specific subject areaFood security and livelihood outcomes
Type of dataTable, Dta. File, text file, Figure
How data was acquiredHousehold survey
Data formatRaw, analyzed, descriptive and statistical data
Experimental factors.Samples consist of all private households in all the nine provinces of South Africa and residents in workers' hostels.
Experimental featuresThere was no experimental component in the dataset used
Data source location9 provinces in South Africa; Western Cape, Eastern Cape, Northern Cape, North West, Free State, Kwazulu Natal, Gauteng, Limpopo and Mpumalanga
Data accessibilityThe datasets explored and analyzed are available at http://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/2559
Related research articleNone
Value of the data

These data present information on the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of household as it relates with food (in) security of the household members. This dataset will provide valuable information that may be functional at different levels for both government organizations (GOs) and non-government organizations (NGOs) in order to formulate appropriate policy and intervention strategy for the improvement of food for poor households in South Africa.

This data allows other researchers to extend the statistical analyses in various dimension of measuring livelihood outcomes in South Africa.

  1 in total

1.  What Drives Households' Payment for Waste Disposal and Recycling Behaviours? Empirical Evidence from South Africa's General Household Survey.

Authors:  Abiodun Olusola Omotayo; Abeeb Babatunde Omotoso; Adebola Saidat Daud; Adebayo Isaiah Ogunniyi; Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.