| Literature DB >> 31371223 |
Chenglong Chen1, Huan Fang2, Yurui Jiao3, Yi Zhou4, Qiang Guo2, Zhi Lv5.
Abstract
The treatment of renal cell carcinoma has achieved certain curative effects with the innovation of clinical drugs, such as sunitinib. However, the clinical efficacy and complication rate of the sunitinib 2/1 and 4/2 schedule in metastatic renal cell cancer remain unclear. In this study we aimed to resolve this issue by using meta-analysis to provide more theoretical guidance for clinical use. Several outcome measurements were included in this study to compare the 2 schedules such as complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease, progression-free survival, overall survival, and complications. In the contrast analysis, the sunitinib 2/1 and 4/2 schedule resulted in significant improvements in prognosis. However, the sunitinib 2/1 schedule was superior to the 4/2 schedule in terms of controlling stable disease and causing fewer complications.Entities:
Keywords: Meta-analysis; Metastatic renal cell cancer; Schedule 2/1; Schedule 4/2; Sunitinib
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31371223 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.06.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer ISSN: 1558-7673 Impact factor: 2.872