Peter Schott1, Marcus Katoh2, Nicolas Fischer3, Patrick Freyhardt2. 1. Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, 47805 Krefeld, Germany. Electronic address: peter.schott@helios-gesundheit.de. 2. Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, 47805 Krefeld, Germany. 3. Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, 47805 Krefeld, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose in patients undergoing prostatic artery embolization (PAE) using cone-beam CT and 3-dimensional (3D) guidance software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, 100 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (mean prostate volume, 83.6 mL ± 44.2; 69.4 ± 9.6 years of age; body mass index, 26.5 ± 4.2) were treated using PAE between October 2016 and April 2018. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. All patients received at least 1 intraprocedural cone-beam CT per side for evaluation of the vessel anatomy and software rendering of 3D guidance for catheter guidance. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in the distal branches only. The total dose area product (DAP), along with the DAP attributed to fluoroscopy, DSA, and cone-beam CT, were assessed. RESULTS: Bilateral embolization was achieved in 83 patients (83%). The average total DAP was 134.4 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 69.5 (range, 44.7-410.9 Gy ⋅ cm2). Fluoroscopy, DSA, and cone-beam CT accounted for 35.5 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 21.3 (range, 8.6-148.6 Gy ⋅ cm2) or 26.4% (percentage of total DAP), 58.2 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 48.3 (range, 10.3-309.3 Gy ⋅ cm2) or 43.3%, and 40.7 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 14.5 (range, 15.9-86.3 Gy ⋅ cm2) or 30.3%, respectively. Average procedure time was 89.4 ± 27.0 minutes, and the average fluoroscopy time was 30.9 ± 12.2 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intraprocedural cone-beam CT in combination with 3D guidance software allows for identification and catheterization of the prostatic artery in PAE. Furthermore, the results of this trial indicate that this study protocol may lead to a low overall radiation dose.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose in patients undergoing prostatic artery embolization (PAE) using cone-beam CT and 3-dimensional (3D) guidance software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, 100 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (mean prostate volume, 83.6 mL ± 44.2; 69.4 ± 9.6 years of age; body mass index, 26.5 ± 4.2) were treated using PAE between October 2016 and April 2018. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. All patients received at least 1 intraprocedural cone-beam CT per side for evaluation of the vessel anatomy and software rendering of 3D guidance for catheter guidance. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in the distal branches only. The total dose area product (DAP), along with the DAP attributed to fluoroscopy, DSA, and cone-beam CT, were assessed. RESULTS: Bilateral embolization was achieved in 83 patients (83%). The average total DAP was 134.4 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 69.5 (range, 44.7-410.9 Gy ⋅ cm2). Fluoroscopy, DSA, and cone-beam CT accounted for 35.5 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 21.3 (range, 8.6-148.6 Gy ⋅ cm2) or 26.4% (percentage of total DAP), 58.2 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 48.3 (range, 10.3-309.3 Gy ⋅ cm2) or 43.3%, and 40.7 Gy ⋅ cm2 ± 14.5 (range, 15.9-86.3 Gy ⋅ cm2) or 30.3%, respectively. Average procedure time was 89.4 ± 27.0 minutes, and the average fluoroscopy time was 30.9 ± 12.2 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Intraprocedural cone-beam CT in combination with 3D guidance software allows for identification and catheterization of the prostatic artery in PAE. Furthermore, the results of this trial indicate that this study protocol may lead to a low overall radiation dose.
Authors: Timothy D McClure; Ana K Ortiz; Raphael Doustaly; Arthur Rocha; Airton M Moreira; Andre M de Assis; Matthias Barral; Francois H Cornelis; Francisco C Carnevale Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Ubenicio Silveira Dias; Maurício Ruettimann Liberato de Moura; Publio Cesar Cavalcante Viana; André Moreira de Assis; Antônio Sérgio Zanfred Marcelino; Airton Mota Moreira; Claudia Costa Leite; Giovanni Guido Cerri; Francisco Cesar Carnevale; Natally Horvat Journal: Radiographics Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Alexander S Somwaru; Stephen Metting; Laura M Flisnik; Michael G Nellamattathil; Arjun Sharma; Venkat S Katabathina Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Timo C Meine; Cornelia L A Dewald; L S Becker; Aline Mähringer-Kunz; Benjamin Massoumy; Sabine K Maschke; Martha M Kirstein; Thomas Werncke; Frank K Wacker; Bernhard C Meyer; Jan B Hinrichs Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2020-11
Authors: Francisco Cesar Carnevale; Timothy McClure; Farah Cadour; Vincent Vidal; André Moreira de Assis; Airton Mota Moreira; Arthur Diego Dias Rocha; Aya Rebet; Charles Nutting Journal: CVIR Endovasc Date: 2021-08-10