| Literature DB >> 31370843 |
Xiao-Dong Li1, Sheng-Qing Chi1, Li-Yun Wu1, Can Liu1, Tong Sun1, Juan Hong1, Xun Chen1, Xiao-Gang Chen1, Guan-Song Wang1, Dao-Jin Yu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ceftiofur Sodium is widely used in China. Our aim was to determine Ceftiofur Sodium activity and optimize dosing regimens against the pathogen Haemophilus parasuis using an in vitro and ex vivo pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics modeling approach. By adopting these strategies, we wanted to extend the effective life of Ceftiofur Sodium in reduce drug-resistance in pigs.Entities:
Keywords: Ceftiofur sodium; Ex vivo bactericidal activity, Glässers disease; Haemophilus parasuis; PK/PD model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31370843 PMCID: PMC6676638 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-2008-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1The growth curve of Haemophilus parasuis in TSB medium. Density of bacteria was represented by absorbance value under 600 nm (OD600). Square dots indicate the mean of triplicate measurements of densities and the bars indicate standard deviation (% SD)
Fig. 2The concentration-time curve of DFC in both health and infected pigs after intramuscular injection of CS. Dots indicate the mean of concentration in health (black square) and infected pigs (red triangle), and the bars indicate standard deviation (% SD)
Pharmacokinetic parameters of CS (10 mg/kg, i.m.) after fitting two-compartment open model with first-order absorption
| Parameter | Unit | Healthy pigs ( | Diseased pigs ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ka | 1/h | 0.489 ± 0.061a | 0.537 ± 0.054a |
| AUC | h·μg/mL | 125.646 ± 9.895a | 126.498 ± 13.752a |
| AUMC | h2·μg/mL | 2201.958 ± 829.817a | 1703.975 ± 442.930a |
| MRT | h | 15.503 ± 7.001a | 11.436 ± 2.547a |
| Cmax | μg/mL | 11.236 ± 0.603a | 11.504 ± 0.575a |
| Tmax | h | 2.358 ± 0.286a | 2.226 ± 0.146a |
| T1/2Ka | h | 1.456 ± 0.172a | 1.281 ± 0.143a |
| T1/2Ke | h | 17.550 ± 8.830a | 11.247 ± 2.930a |
| Vd/F | L/kg | 2.402 ± 0.999a | 1.649 ± 0.482a |
| CL/F | mL/h/kg | 80.010 ± 6.115a | 79.837 ± 8.640a |
Ka, absorption rate constant; AUC, area under the concentration-time curve after every administration; AUMC, the area under the first moment of the plasma concentration-time curve; MRT, presented mean residence time; Cmax, the maximum concentration during the dosage interval; Tmax, the time to reach peak concentration; T1/2Ka, absorption half-life; T1/2Ke, elimination half-life; Vd/F, volume of distribution; CL/F, systemic clearance. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05)
Fig. 3The 24 h inhibition curve of CS against Haemophilus parasuis. Density of bacteria was represented by logarithm of actual concentration (CFU/mL)
Fig. 4Ex vivo bactericidal curves of DFC in the plasma of healthy pigs against Haemophilus parasuis. Density of bacteria was represented by logarithm of actual concentration (CFU/mL)
Fig. 5Ex vivo bactericidal profiles of DFC in the plasma of diseased pigs against Haemophilus parasuis. Density of bacteria was represented by logarithm of actual concentration (CFU/mL)
Fig. 6Curve-fitting results for healthy pigs
Fig. 7Curve-fitting results for diseased pigs
Results for fitting of the Hill equation
| Parameter | Healthy pigs | Infected pigs |
|---|---|---|
| Emax (lg CFU) | −6.449 | − 6.543 |
| EC50 (h) | 124.247 | 241.774 |
| E0 (lg CFU) | 2.268 | 2.120 |
| N | 10.000 | 2.171 |
| (Ce E = 0) AUC24 h/MIC for bacteriostatic action (h) | 28.406 | 36.006 |
| (Ce E = -3) AUC24 h/MIC for bactericidal action (h) | 29.516 | 71.637 |
| (Ce E = -4) AUC24 h/MIC for bacteriophagous action (h) | 29.913 | 90.619 |
| Dose (Ce E = 0) (mg/kg) | 0.473 | 0.599 |
| Dose (Ce E = -3) (mg/kg) | 0.492 | 1.191 |
| Dose (Ce E = -4) (mg/kg) | 0.499 | 1.507 |
AUC represents the area under the curve; MIC is the minimum inhibitory concentration; E0 represents the maximum difference in the logarithm of the bacterial count after 24 h of bacterial culture in the blank group; Emax is the maximum difference in the logarithm of the bacterial count after 24 h of bacterial culture in the serum sample; EC50 represents the AUC/MIC when reaching 50% of the maximum antibacterial effect in the serum sample; N is the slope of the equation (no unit)