Literature DB >> 31370612

The impact of peripheral mechanisms on the precedence effect.

M Torben Pastore1, Jonas Braasch2.   

Abstract

When two similar sounds are presented from different locations, with one (the lead) preceding the other (the lag) by a small delay, listeners typically report hearing one sound near the location of the lead sound source-this is called the precedence effect (PE). Several questions about the underlying mechanisms that produce the PE are asked. (1) How might listeners' relative weighting of cues at onset versus ongoing stimulus portions affect perceived lateral position of long-duration lead/lag noise stimuli? (2) What are the factors that influence this weighting? (3) Are the mechanisms invoked to explain the PE for transient stimuli applicable to long-duration stimuli? To answer these questions, lead/lag noise stimuli are presented with a range of durations, onset slopes, and lag-to-lead level ratios over headphones. Monaural, peripheral mechanisms, and binaural cue extraction are modeled to estimate the cues available for determination of perceived laterality. Results showed that all three stimulus manipulations affect the relative weighting of onset and ongoing cues and that mechanisms invoked to explain the PE for transient stimuli are also applicable to the PE, in terms of both onset and ongoing segments of long-duration, lead/lag stimuli.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31370612      PMCID: PMC6658214          DOI: 10.1121/1.5116680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  52 in total

1.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The precedence effect.

Authors:  R Y Litovsky; H S Colburn; W A Yost; S J Guzman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Peripheral auditory processing and investigations of the "precedence effect" which utilize successive transient stimuli.

Authors:  K Hartung; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Precedence-effect thresholds for a population of untrained listeners as a function of stimulus intensity and interclick interval.

Authors:  Kourosh Saberi; Joseph V Antonio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Peripheral auditory processing, the precedence effect and responses of single units in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Constantine Trahiotis; Klaus Hartung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Lateralization of two-transient stimuli.

Authors:  Patrick M Zurek; Kourosh Saberi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

7.  A population study of the precedence effect.

Authors:  Kourosh Saberi; Joseph V Antonio; Agavni Petrosyan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization.

Authors:  F L Wightman; D J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The influence of spectral, temporal, and interaural stimulus variations on the precedence effect.

Authors:  Roberto M Dizon; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal weighting in sound localization.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.